Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Reported in : (2004)(3)SLJ54CAT
1. The applicants in all the above twenty five original applications were appointed as School Teachers by Chandigarh Administration on contract basis for a specific period. In view of the various decisions of the Apex Court, High Court and this Tribunal the contract appointees have been allowed to continue in service till such time they are replaced by the duly selected and appointed teachers in accordance with the provisions of the Chandigarh Education Service (School Cadre) Group 'C' Recruitment Rules, 1991 (for short "School Cadre Rules of 1991").The District Education Officer issued an advertisement dated 9th/10th August, 2002 inviting applications for appointment on contract basis with a view to replace the earlier contract appointees. This notification was challenged by another set of contract appointees by filing number of original applications, the leading of which was O.A.No. 126-CH-2002 (Krishan Kumar v. Union Territory Chandigarh and Ors.) decided on 2nd December, 2002. In ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Reported in : (2004)(1)SLJ71CAT
1. The moot point which arises for consideration and determination in the present O.A. is--Whether an employee whose lien in the parent department stood terminated on account of his permanent absorption in the Department to which he has gone on deputation can be repatriated to the parent department to the serious detriment of an employee who has acquired a vested right on the promotional post in the parent department? 2. This controversy has come up before us in the background of the following admitted facts.3. The present applicant Shri Amir Chand Kakkar and his acclaimed senior, respondent No. 4, Shri Ram Prakash Sharma, were initially appointed as Lower Division Clerks in the office of the Director, Northern Region Farm Machinery Tools & Training Institute, Hisar, Haryana (for short 'TTI')., respondent No. 2, respectively on 17.1.1997 and 11.5.1973. In the year 1992, an advertisement was issued by the Director, National Biofertiliser Development Centre, CGO Complex, Kamala Nehr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Reported in : (2004)(1)SLJ333CAT
1. The applicant Shri S.L. Kukreja has since retired from the post of Executive Engineer, MES on 31st of May, 2000. While he was in service, proceedings for major penalty were instituted against him under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Control, Classification & Appeal) Rules, 1965 (for short 'CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965'), pursuant to the Ministry of Defence Memorandum dated 21st October, 1993, a copy of which is Annexure A-2. The substance of the charge against the applicant is that while he was posted as Assistant Engineer, AGE (B&R) at GE (P), Maharajpur, during the period August, 1983 to April, 1987, he failed to effectively supervise the work of provision of false ceiling and the lapse on his part is attributable to a collapse of Hanger P-3 at Air Force Station, Maharajpur on 23rd May, 1989.2. In all 5 Officers including the applicant were served with the charge memos dated 21.10.1993. Shri Bimal Datta, SE (SG) was appointed as Inquiry Officer. The report of enquiry dat...
Tag this Judgment!