Semantic Analysis by spaCy
ingram Vs. United States
Decided On : Jun-29-1959
Court : US Supreme Court
ORG: Ingram, U.S. Supreme Court, Ingram, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS , THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Court, Page 360 U. S. 673 , the Court of Appeals, the Internal Revenue Code, the Internal Revenue Code, Court, Ingram, Ingram, Ingram, §§ 4401, the Internal Revenue Code, the Internal Revenue District, Ingram, Ingram, the Federal Government, Kahriger, Court, Congress, Court, Ingram, Ingram, Ingram, Direct Sales Co., Spies, Ingram, circumstantially, Supp, Supp, Ingram, Direct Sales Co., Court, Court, Ingram, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, Harv, Court, Kahriger, Government, the Internal Revenue Code, State, Court, Ingram, Court, Ingram, Court, Ingram, Court, Government
GPE: United States - 360, U.S., United States, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., Atlanta, Georgia, Georgia, United States, Jenkins, Atlanta, Jenkins, Georgia, United States, United States, United States, U.S., the United States, United States, United States, United States, United States v. Falcone, United States, United States, United States, U.S., United States, United States, MR, the United States, United States, United States, MR, United States, United States, United States, Georgia, Jenkins
DATE: 1959, 1959, April 30, 1959, June 29, 1959, the years, 1954 to 1957, 4411, 4412, 7272, several years, 4411, 4412, previous years, 6107, 287 U. S. 112 , 1954, 1957, 1955
PRODUCT: Ingram, Ingram
CARDINAL: 360, 457, 360, four, 18, 371, Two, two, 1, two, 2, two, 259, twenty-two, six, 1, 259, 886, 358, 905, 2, 3, two, 5, 6, 8, Two, two, 317, 9, 10, 26, 26, 319, 1, 525, 527, 528, 851, 18, two, one, 62, 701, 2, some 2,400, thousands, two, six, 3, 26-6502, 4, 1, 6, 851, 527, 8, 866, 9, 72, 920, 939, 10, Two
PERSON: STEWART, Certiorari, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Calamaro, Gebardi, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Petitioner Ingram, Grunewald, Lutwak, Krulewitch v. United States, Grunewald v. United States, DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, Calamaro, Calamaro, Smith, Law, Jenkins, Smith, Law, Smith, Law, Jenkins
NORP: Congressional
PERCENT: 10 percent
MONEY: 50, 3,500, 50
ORDINAL: first, second