Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp. Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.

Decided On : Apr-11-1955

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context

$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'the Natural Gas Act'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Panoma Corp.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 2 => 'Panoma Corp.',
			(int) 3 => 'Panoma Corporation
 



 Argued',
			(int) 4 => 'THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 





 ',
			(int) 5 => 'Syllabus',
			(int) 6 => 'State',
			(int) 7 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
			(int) 8 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
			(int) 9 => 'State',
			(int) 10 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
			(int) 11 => 'Peerless Oil and Gas Co.',
			(int) 12 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
			(int) 13 => 'State',
			(int) 14 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
			(int) 15 => 'Corporation Commission'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 3 => 'Oklahoma',
			(int) 4 => 'Wisconsin',
			(int) 5 => 'Oklahoma',
			(int) 6 => 'MR',
			(int) 7 => 'Wisconsin',
			(int) 8 => 'Oklahoma'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1955',
			(int) 1 => '1955',
			(int) 2 => 'March 28-29, 1955',
			(int) 3 => 'April 11, 1955',
			(int) 4 => 'March 29, 1955'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '349',
			(int) 1 => '349',
			(int) 2 => '271',
			(int) 3 => '354',
			(int) 4 => '272',
			(int) 5 => '425',
			(int) 6 => '321'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Phillips',
			(int) 1 => 'DOUGLAS'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'the Natural Gas Act'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Panoma Corp.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 2 => 'Panoma Corp.',
		(int) 3 => 'Panoma Corporation
 



 Argued',
		(int) 4 => 'THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 





 ',
		(int) 5 => 'Syllabus',
		(int) 6 => 'State',
		(int) 7 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
		(int) 8 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
		(int) 9 => 'State',
		(int) 10 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
		(int) 11 => 'Peerless Oil and Gas Co.',
		(int) 12 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
		(int) 13 => 'State',
		(int) 14 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
		(int) 15 => 'Corporation Commission'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 3 => 'Oklahoma',
		(int) 4 => 'Wisconsin',
		(int) 5 => 'Oklahoma',
		(int) 6 => 'MR',
		(int) 7 => 'Wisconsin',
		(int) 8 => 'Oklahoma'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1955',
		(int) 1 => '1955',
		(int) 2 => 'March 28-29, 1955',
		(int) 3 => 'April 11, 1955',
		(int) 4 => 'March 29, 1955'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '349',
		(int) 1 => '349',
		(int) 2 => '271',
		(int) 3 => '354',
		(int) 4 => '272',
		(int) 5 => '425',
		(int) 6 => '321'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Phillips',
		(int) 1 => 'DOUGLAS'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'the Natural Gas Act'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Panoma Corp.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 2 => 'Panoma Corp.',
			(int) 3 => 'Panoma Corporation
 



 Argued',
			(int) 4 => 'THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 





 ',
			(int) 5 => 'Syllabus',
			(int) 6 => 'State',
			(int) 7 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
			(int) 8 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
			(int) 9 => 'State',
			(int) 10 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
			(int) 11 => 'Peerless Oil and Gas Co.',
			(int) 12 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
			(int) 13 => 'State',
			(int) 14 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
			(int) 15 => 'Corporation Commission'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 3 => 'Oklahoma',
			(int) 4 => 'Wisconsin',
			(int) 5 => 'Oklahoma',
			(int) 6 => 'MR',
			(int) 7 => 'Wisconsin',
			(int) 8 => 'Oklahoma'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1955',
			(int) 1 => '1955',
			(int) 2 => 'March 28-29, 1955',
			(int) 3 => 'April 11, 1955',
			(int) 4 => 'March 29, 1955'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '349',
			(int) 1 => '349',
			(int) 2 => '271',
			(int) 3 => '354',
			(int) 4 => '272',
			(int) 5 => '425',
			(int) 6 => '321'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Phillips',
			(int) 1 => 'DOUGLAS'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'the Natural Gas Act'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Panoma Corp.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 2 => 'Panoma Corp.',
		(int) 3 => 'Panoma Corporation
 



 Argued',
		(int) 4 => 'THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 





 ',
		(int) 5 => 'Syllabus',
		(int) 6 => 'State',
		(int) 7 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
		(int) 8 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
		(int) 9 => 'State',
		(int) 10 => 'the Federal Power Commission',
		(int) 11 => 'Peerless Oil and Gas Co.',
		(int) 12 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
		(int) 13 => 'State',
		(int) 14 => 'Phillips Petroleum Co.',
		(int) 15 => 'Corporation Commission'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 3 => 'Oklahoma',
		(int) 4 => 'Wisconsin',
		(int) 5 => 'Oklahoma',
		(int) 6 => 'MR',
		(int) 7 => 'Wisconsin',
		(int) 8 => 'Oklahoma'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1955',
		(int) 1 => '1955',
		(int) 2 => 'March 28-29, 1955',
		(int) 3 => 'April 11, 1955',
		(int) 4 => 'March 29, 1955'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '349',
		(int) 1 => '349',
		(int) 2 => '271',
		(int) 3 => '354',
		(int) 4 => '272',
		(int) 5 => '425',
		(int) 6 => '321'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Phillips',
		(int) 1 => 'DOUGLAS'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

LAW: the Natural Gas Act

ORG: Panoma Corp., U.S. Supreme Court, Panoma Corp., Panoma Corporation Argued, THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA , Syllabus, State, the Federal Power Commission, Phillips Petroleum Co., State, the Federal Power Commission, Peerless Oil and Gas Co., Phillips Petroleum Co., State, Phillips Petroleum Co., Corporation Commission

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, MR, Wisconsin, Oklahoma

DATE: 1955, 1955, March 28-29, 1955, April 11, 1955, March 29, 1955

CARDINAL: 349, 349, 271, 354, 272, 425, 321

PERSON: Phillips, DOUGLAS