Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United States Vs. Kahriger

Decided On : Mar-09-1953

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Revenue Act, the Tenth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Revenue Act, the Fifth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, the Internal Revenue Act, Constitution, Constitution, the Fifth Amendment, the National Prohibition Act, Constitution, the Fifth Amendment, the Due Process Clause, Constitution, section 3267, the Fifth Amendment, The Fifth Amendment, Constitution, the Sixteenth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, a Bill of Rights, a Bill of Rights, the Fifth Amendment, Constitution, the Fifth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, Constitution

GPE: United States, U.S., United States, U.S., United States, U.S., §, the United States, Pennsylvania, United States, United States, United States, United States, United States, United States, United States, marihuana, McCulloch, Maryland, United States, United States, U.S., United States, U.S., United States, United States, United States, United States, United States, Jordan, United States, U.S., Michigan, marihuana, McCulloch, Maryland, United States, United States, United States, United States, U.S., U.S., United States, United States, United States, New York, United States, McCulloch, Maryland, United States, United States, United States, United States v. Curtis-Wright Corp., Compare United States, The United States, Pennsylvania, United States, States, States, States

ORG: Kahriger - 345, U.S. Supreme Court, Kahriger, Syllabus, the Collector of Internal Revenue, the Federal Government, Congress, the District Court, Court, Court, the Collector of Internal Revenue, Congress, Supp, The District Court, the Federal Government, Court, Congress, License Tax Cases, Congress, Congress, Court, Congress, Court, State, License Cases, Veazie Bank, Sanchez, Congress, Congress, License Tax Cases, Congress, Veazie Bank, the Bank of the United States, Court, Congress, Congress, the Judicial Department, Court, Congress, Court, the Commerce Clause, Court, Congress, Congress, Court, Veazie Bank, Court, Supp, Supp, State, Supp, Supp, Supp, Nadler, Congress, the Federal Government, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Veazie Bank, Rapier, the Louisiana Lottery, Hipolite Egg Co., Caminetti, Butler, Board of Trade v. Olsen, Congress, the Commerce Clause, Congress, Congress, Congress, E. Fougera & Co., City of New York, N.Y. 269, N.E. 642, the District Court, Beacon Brass Co., Supp, Steward Machine Co., Court, Congress, Congress, Fifth Amendment, Congress, Congress, Court, Court, Supp, Purdon, Court, Congress, Congress, the State Legislatures, Court, Veazie Bank, Congress, Congress, Court, Congress, Court, Congress, Congress Page, Congress, the Federal Government, Congress, Congress, Congress, the Federal Government, State, State, State, Congress, State, Congress

DATE: 1953, 1953, December 16-17, 1952, March 9, 1953, 1951, 3290, under 18, 3731, 1951, 3731, 249 U. S. 86, 274 U. S. 259 , 1940, 3285, 3290, Sept. 18, 1952, 1953, 6892, 12236, October 3, 1952, 220 U. S. 45, 249 U. S. 86, 2810, 3285, annually, 3290, 3291, 3294, 1945, 4602, 4603

CARDINAL: 345, 167, 345, 26, 1, 2, 3, 105, 322, 26, 26, 3291, 105, 322, 1, two, 26, 3291, 18, 296, 105, 322, 323, seven, 2, 5, 462, 5, 5, 5, 3, 8, 533, 4, 5, 5, 8, 533, 316, 6, 8, 8, 9, 10, 12, 274, 274, 8, 13, 14, 26, 15, 16, 3285(b)(2, 1, 10, 1, 2, 3291, 1, 2, 3, 3294, 106, 9, 105, 918, 105, 136, 107, 38, 478, 111, 605, 101, 531, 342, 939, 3, 97, 97, 4, One, 30, 6, 316, 8, 533, 312, 312, 9, 10, 296, 12, 26, 2011, 26, 26, 3270, 13, 224, 281, 120, 14, 15, 1, 2, 16, 26, 18, 8, 533, Two, one, two, one, one

MONEY: 50, 1,000, 50, less than $1,000, more than $5,000, 4,371,869, 400,000,000, 4,371,869, 3,501, 914,910, 28,911

WORK_OF_ART: the Due Process Clause, The Lottery Case, Child Labor Tax Case, Child Labor Tax Case, Child Labor Tax Case, Brandeis

NORP: F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, F.Supp, §

PERSON: REED, Appellee, Kahriger, Sonzinsky, Appellee, McCray, Nigro v. United States, Sonzinsky, Appellee, Marshall, McCulloch, Sonzinsky, Appellee, Sullivan, appellee, Forrester, Robinson, Arnold, Wingate, Penn, Combs v. Snyder, Cong, HOFFMAN, COOPER, Cong, Sheriff, Weber, Mulford v. Smith, Wickard v. Filburn, Hill, Wallace, Trusler, Hammer v. Dagenhart, Darby, Jin Fuey Moy, Linder, Nigro v. United States, Hill, Wallace, Linder v. United States, Trusler, Davis, Shapiro, Davis, JUSTICE JACKSON, Shapiro v. United States, DOUGLAS, Feldman, Tit, JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, Holmes, Hammer v. Dagenhart, Darby, Holmes, Hammer v. Dagenhart, McKenna, Brown v. Walker, Feldman, DOUGLAS

ORDINAL: First, Secondly, first, third, second

LOC: the Eastern District

QUANTITY: 3d ed.

PERCENT: 259 U. S. 20, 143 U. S. 110 , 239 U. S. 325 , 259 U. S. 44, 259 U. S. 20, 259 U. S. 44, 259 U. S. 20

FAC: Pa.Stat

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //