Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Coray Vs. Southern Pacific Co.

Decided On : Jan-03-1949

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act

PERSON: Coray v. Southern Pacific Co. - 335, Coray v., Coray v., Frank Lucus, Lucus, grant certiorari, Brady, Terminal R. Assn., Davis

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Utah, Utah, Utah, U.S., Utah, Lemay, Utah, Utah

DATE: 1949, 1949, 54, December 6-7, 1948, January 3, 1949, 292 U. S. 589, 8, 65, 1404, 53, 56, 59

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Southern Pacific Co., Southern Pacific Co. , THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH, the Federal Safety Appliance and Federal Employers', the Federal Safety Appliance and Federal Employers', The Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Federal Safety Appliance and Federal Employers', the Federal Safety Appliance Act, the Federal Safety Appliance Act, Act, the State Supreme Court, the State Supreme Court's, Fairport, P. & E. R. Co., Meredith, Act, Louisville & N. R. Co., Layton, Spokane & I.E. R. Co., Campbell, The Utah Supreme Court, Page 335 U. S. 524 , Congress, Congress, Congress, the State Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 335, 335, 1, 2, 185, 963, 185, 963, 335, 1, one, eighty-two, 185, 963, 969, two, 303, one, 45, 51, 45, 53, 1, 531, 32, 943, 45, 9, 35, 36, 291, 53, 45, 2

QUANTITY: several hundred feet, about one hundred feet

ORDINAL: First, Second, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //