Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Coray Vs. Southern Pacific Co.
Decided On : Jan-03-1949
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: the Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act
PERSON: Coray v. Southern Pacific Co. - 335, Coray v., Coray v., Frank Lucus, Lucus, grant certiorari, Brady, Terminal R. Assn., Davis
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Utah, Utah, Utah, U.S., Utah, Lemay, Utah, Utah
DATE: 1949, 1949, 54, December 6-7, 1948, January 3, 1949, 292 U. S. 589, 8, 65, 1404, 53, 56, 59
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Southern Pacific Co., Southern Pacific Co. , THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH, the Federal Safety Appliance and Federal Employers', the Federal Safety Appliance and Federal Employers', The Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Federal Safety Appliance and Federal Employers', the Federal Safety Appliance Act, the Federal Safety Appliance Act, Act, the State Supreme Court, the State Supreme Court's, Fairport, P. & E. R. Co., Meredith, Act, Louisville & N. R. Co., Layton, Spokane & I.E. R. Co., Campbell, The Utah Supreme Court, Page 335 U. S. 524 , Congress, Congress, Congress, the State Supreme Court
CARDINAL: 335, 335, 1, 2, 185, 963, 185, 963, 335, 1, one, eighty-two, 185, 963, 969, two, 303, one, 45, 51, 45, 53, 1, 531, 32, 943, 45, 9, 35, 36, 291, 53, 45, 2
QUANTITY: several hundred feet, about one hundred feet
ORDINAL: First, Second, first