Ramjas Foundation Vs. Sunita Sharma

Decided On : Jul-15-2013

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 25 F, Section 25F(a, Section 25F(b, Rule 77 of the Rules, Section 8 of DSE Act, Section 25F, Section 25F, Section 25F(b, Section 25F, Section 25G of the Act, Section 25FFF of the Act, Section 25FFF of the Act, Section 25F, Section 25-F of the Act, Section 25G, Rule 77 of the Rules, Rule 77, Rule 77, the Societies Act, Section 25F(b, Section 25F(b, Section 25F(a, Section 25F(a, Section 25F(b).21, Section 25-F, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-F, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 77, the DSE Act, Section 2(n, Section 5, Section 8, section 9, the DSE Act, section 10, the DSE Act, Section 28, section 28(2, Rule 96, the DSE Act, the DSE Act, Rule 77

CARDINAL: 24.10.2009, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 30.10.2009, 24.10.2009, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, 21.05.2010, about 1600, 78, two, 78, 19, one, one, one, 976.In, 1, 2, 16, 4, 21, 23, 7, 285, 2, 373.16, 17, one, more than 1000, 500, 3000, 17, one, three, 20, 5, 4, 3, 500, 3000, more than one, 1600, two, one, one, 98, one, 9, one, 9, 200.SC, 5, 942, 7, 7, 754, 9, 105, 50,000, 7, 755, 2, 429, 5, 934, 9, 35, 02.04.2013, Rs.2, three, 78, only 16

GPE: ID No.06/2005, Gautam, Gautam, SHARMA, Gautam, Gautam, NARAYAN, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Gautam, Village, New Delhi, Ld, Ld, Workmen, India, Workmen, Nehru, Delhi, Delhi, Govt, WP, Village, New Delhi, Singh Shekawat

PERSON: Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy Ghose, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, versus SUNITA, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C)-3039/2010, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, GUPTA, Sanjoy Ghose, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, versus KUSUM, Sanjoy, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, W.P.(C)883/2010, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, 6510/2010, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, Sudhendhu, Sudhendhu, Sanjoy, W.P.(C)-6513/2010, Sudhendhu, M.K. BHARGAV, Sanjoy, W.P.(C, 6515/2010, Sudhendhu, versus NARENDER, Sanjoy, VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT, Sadhora Khurd, Petitioner, Babita Arora and Others, Sudhoo, Haji Lal Mohd, Mohd, Nasrullah Khan, Krishna Bahadur v M/S, Anoop Sharma v Executive Engineer, N. Sundara Money, Pramod Jha v. State of, Vijendrasingh Ladusingh Shekhawat, Anr, jurisdiction.26, Sudhoo, Sadhora Khurd, inter se, inter se, Kumar Sharma, M.C. Joshi, Karnataka Rt, Corpn, Ashappa, Gurmail Singh v. Principal, Rajak, Municipal Corpn, Mamni, Krishna Bahadur, Anoop Sharma, Vijendra Singh, Mahesh Dutt v. Ramjas Foundation, Narender Kumar, No.6515/2010, Narender Kumar, Dina Ram, Chet Ram, Rameshwar, Dinaram, Rameshwar, VIPIN SANGHI

DATE: 6499/2010, 6501/2010, 6514/2010, 24.10.2009, 3041/2010, 3043/2010, 31.10.2009, 5412/2010, 31.10.2009, 6500/2010, 6502/2010, 6511/2010, 6512/2010, 19992000, 1957, 1973, 1995, 1969, 1954, that year, 1964)5SCR602 10, 11, 1994, 2007, Para 16, 2001, about 240 days, 2007, 1990, 2005, 2006, 1860, 2004, One month's, fifteen days, six months, 2010, one month's, 2004, 1947, 2000, ten years', question.29, 1973, the day to day, 2007, 2006, 1830, 2006, 2006, 1776, 2006, 1776, 7-8) 7, 1986, about 12 years, 2000, more than 30 years, 1986, 2006, 2006, 2006, 2006, 1830, 200.SC 2427, about 240 days, three months, today

ORG: ID No.1292/2004), ID No.10/2005), ID No.1293/2004), ID No.1298/2004), ID No.1300/2004), ID No.06 /2005, ID No.178/2004), ID No.1296/2004), ID No.03/2005, DHARAM PAL Through, W.P.(C)883/2010, ID No.1294/2012), Ramjas Foundation, Labour Courts, Chowkri Mubarikabad, Delhi Development Authority, D.D.A, the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, the House Rent Allowance, Wages, HRA, DDA, DDA, Ld Counsel, the Delhi School Education Act, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd v Employees Union, Hyderabad, The Supreme Court, Parry & Co Ltd v P.C Pal, Calcutta, Company, The Supreme Court, Legislature, Tribunal, Calcutta, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Shiv Kumar Sharma& Ors v State of, Haryana& Ors, The Supreme Court, Specified, District Red Cross Society, the Supreme Court, the Appellant Society, The Supreme Court, Court, Reliance, Madhya Pradesh Administrator V. Tribhuban, Ld Counsel, Respondents, State of Madhya Pradesh, Court, Reliance, Bivi Works & Others, I.C 1538.Municipal Corporation, Ashar Ram & Anr, Andhra Pradesh & Others, Ld Counsel, Supreme Court, Ors AIR, SC, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State Bank of India, Court, Clauses, the Bombay High Court, the House Rent Allowance, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Labour Courts, The Labour Courts, Chowkri Mubarikabad, the Labour Courts, the Labour Court, The Delhi School Education Rules, the DSE Rules, Education, DSE, Education, Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Labour Courts, the Supreme Court, District Red Cross Society, Madhya Pradesh Administration, The Supreme Court, Madhya Pradesh Administration, the Supreme Court, Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation, the Supreme Court, Court, Haryana State Electronics Development Corpn, Mamni Ltd., L&S, Court, L&S, U.P. SRTC v., L&S, L&S, the Labour Court, Court, Govt, College of Education, L&S, the Labour Court, the High Court, Court, Rajasthan v. Ghyan Chand, State, L&S, U.P., L&S, Haryana State Electronics Development Corpn., L&S, the Petitioner on Nehru Yuva Kendriya Sangathan, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, Rs.4905/-.39, Chetram

EVENT: ID No.709/2004

NORP: J.1, Ld, Rules

PERCENT: 6%, 9%

LOC: Workmen, Respondent, North-Eastern

ORDINAL: Secondly, Thirdly, 15it, first, first, 18we, Firstly, Secondly

PRODUCT: Respondent

FAC: Kendra Sangathan v Union

QUANTITY: 9 SCC 74.to