Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United States Vs. Gilliland

Decided On : Feb-03-1941

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Gilliland No, the Criminal Appeals Act, Section 35, the Criminal Code, the "Hot Oil" Act, Section 35, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Appeals Act, the Criminal Code, the Criminal Code, Section 35, the Criminal Code, Section 35

GPE: United States, United States, United States, the United States, the United States, United States, United States, Birdsall, United States, United States, the United States, Kilgore, Texas, Kilgore, Texas, the United States, the United States of America, the United States, United States, the United States, the United States of America, the United States, Texas, United States, the United States, United States, MR, United States, pp, pp

DATE: 1941, 1941, January 10, 1941, February 3, 1941, June 18, 1934, June 18, 1934, February 22, 1935, February 22, 1935, February 22, 1935, June 18, 1934, February 22, 1935, 30, 31, monthly, 35, 1934, February 22, 1935, February 22, 1935, 1934, 35, more than ten years, 35, June 18, 1934, 1933, 35, February 22, 1935, 1934, 35, February 22, 1935, February 22, 1935, 1934, 1934, 1935, Posadas, April 4, 1938, c. 69, 6979, February 28, 1935, 6980, March 1, 1935, 6980, March 1, 1935, 1015, February 7, 1934, 2859, 3724, 11270, 11271, 11513, June 18, 1934

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 86, Syllabus, Court, Federal Tender Board, Interior, State, Court, The District Court, Government, the District Court, The District Court, Court, Borden Co., the Department of the Interior, Interior, the Federal Tender Board No, State, Interior, Federal Tender Board No, Board, Board, the District Court, Government, the District Court, the Government of the United States, Court, Legislature, Interior, the Department of the Interior, the National Industrial Recovery Act, Congress, Interior, the Judiciary Committee, Senate, the Department of the Interior, Interior, the National Industrial Recovery Act, Court, Panama Refining Company v. Ryan, the National Industrial Recovery Act, Congress, National City Bank, Borden Company, the District Court, Interior, the Judiciary Committee, Senate, No.288, H.Rep, No.1202

PERSON: Gilliland, CHIEF JUSTICE, MURPHY, Regulation XIV, Haas v. Henkel, Hammerschmidt, Cong, No.829, Cong, Cong, Cong

CARDINAL: 312, 312, 1, 2, 35, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 35, 8, 35, 35, 181, ten, ten, 18, 682, eleven, 35, 18, 80, 1, Eight, two, 48, 996, 214, 49, 2, 1, 3, one, 35, 35, 35, 4, 35, 6, one, 8, 9, 10, 12, 35, two, 35, 2, 1, 52, 197, 2, 15, 3, 4, 6, 996, 195, 200, 73d, 2d, 78, 3, 73d, 2d, 9, 78, 3725, 6, 5746, 10, 78, 6, 6778, 78, 11, 48, 996, 12, 73d, 2d

NORP: F.Supp

ORDINAL: first

WORK_OF_ART: Hot Oil" Act

LOC: the East Texas Field

MONEY: more than $10,000

PERCENT: 293 U. S. 388 , 216 U. S. 462

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //