Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Griffiths Vs. Commissioner

Decided On : Dec-18-1939

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Corliss v. Bowers, the Revenue Act, the Revenue Act

PERSON: Griffiths v. Commissioner - 308, Griffiths v. Commissioner, Griffiths v. Commissioner of, Smith, Higgins, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Lay, Griffiths, Lay, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Lay, Lay, Griffiths, Lay, Lay, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Gregory, Lay, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., Lay

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Board of Tax Appeals, Court, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Seventh Circuit, the Board of Tax Appeals, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Board of Tax Appeals, Page 308 U. S. 358 , Court, Minnesota Tea Co.

CARDINAL: 308, 49, 103, 110, 531, 37, 314, 103, 110, 37, 314, 308, 102, 456, 44, 44, 209, 47, 169

DATE: December 5, 1939, December 18, 1939, annual, 1933, 1926, the year 1931, 1932, 1926, January, 1933, annual, forty years, 1933, 1932, 1932

PRODUCT: Certiorari

MONEY: one Lay $100,000, 92,500, 100,000, 100,000, 100,000, 15,000

PERCENT: 293 U. S. 465

NORP: Lucas

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //