Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Griffiths Vs. Commissioner
Decided On : Dec-18-1939
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: Corliss v. Bowers, the Revenue Act, the Revenue Act
PERSON: Griffiths v. Commissioner - 308, Griffiths v. Commissioner, Griffiths v. Commissioner of, Smith, Higgins, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Lay, Griffiths, Lay, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Lay, Lay, Griffiths, Lay, Lay, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths, Gregory, Lay, Griffiths, Griffiths, Griffiths
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., Lay
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Board of Tax Appeals, Court, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Seventh Circuit, the Board of Tax Appeals, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Board of Tax Appeals, Page 308 U. S. 358 , Court, Minnesota Tea Co.
CARDINAL: 308, 49, 103, 110, 531, 37, 314, 103, 110, 37, 314, 308, 102, 456, 44, 44, 209, 47, 169
DATE: December 5, 1939, December 18, 1939, annual, 1933, 1926, the year 1931, 1932, 1926, January, 1933, annual, forty years, 1933, 1932, 1932
PRODUCT: Certiorari
MONEY: one Lay $100,000, 92,500, 100,000, 100,000, 100,000, 15,000
PERCENT: 293 U. S. 465
NORP: Lucas