New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson

Decided On : May-16-1938

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context

$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			(int) 1 => 'Jackson - 304',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 3 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			(int) 4 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			(int) 5 => 'Jackson
 



 No',
			(int) 6 => 'Erie Railroad Co.',
			(int) 7 => 'New York Life Insurance Company',
			(int) 8 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
			(int) 9 => 'State',
			(int) 10 => 'the District Court',
			(int) 11 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
			(int) 12 => 'Erie Railroad Company',
			(int) 13 => 'New York Life Ins.',
			(int) 14 => 'the Circuit Court of Appeals'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1938',
			(int) 1 => '1938',
			(int) 2 => 'May 16, 1938',
			(int) 3 => 'monthly',
			(int) 4 => '1927',
			(int) 5 => 'semiannual'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Jackson',
			(int) 1 => 'Certiorari',
			(int) 2 => 'Ruhlin',
			(int) 3 => 'Certiorari'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '304',
			(int) 1 => '869',
			(int) 2 => '304',
			(int) 3 => '94',
			(int) 4 => '288',
			(int) 5 => '94'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'Missouri',
			(int) 3 => 'MR'
		),
		'FAC' => array(
			(int) 0 => '288'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '96656',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '304 U.S. 261',
			'appellant' => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1938-05-16',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson - 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 869
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 16, 1938
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 304 U.S. 261
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 Questions of the construction of an insurance policy are to be decided by the federal courts in accordance with the applicable principles of state law.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari granted; 94 F.2d 288 vacated.
 </p>
<p>
 Petition for certiorari to review a Judgment enforcing an insurance policy, on a cross-bill, in a suit to set it aside.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 This suit was brought by petitioner, New York Life Insurance Company, to cancel the reinstatement of an insurance policy upon the ground that it was obtained by fraud. The defendants, the insured and the beneficiary, denied the responsibility of the insured for any misrepresentations
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="262">
 Page 304 U. S. 262
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 by reason of his mental incapacity at the time. They also filed a cross-bill seeking the payment of the monthly disability benefits for which the policy provided. Decree was rendered in favor of defendants on their cross-bill. The decree declared void the reinstatement of the policy, but held it to be in full force from the date of its issue. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 94 F.2d 288.
 </p>
<p>
 The stipulation of facts stated that the insured, at the time of the issue of the policy in 1927, was a resident of Missouri, and that the policy was delivered to the insured in that State. Findings of the District Court followed the stipulation.
 </p>
<p>
 The Circuit Court of Appeals considered the question whether, under the provisions of the policy, the insurer was liable for disability benefits to the insured who became totally and permanently disabled during the period of grace following the date on which a semiannual premium payment fell due where the premium was not paid until after the expiration of the period of grace. The court considered the question as one of general law. Its decision should have been made according to the applicable principles of the state law which governed the interpretation of the policy.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 ;
 <em>
 Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co., ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96673/ruhlin-vs-new-york-life-ins-co">
 304 U. S. 202
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Judgment vacated.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Jackson',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/304/261/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '96656'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		(int) 1 => 'Jackson - 304',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 3 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		(int) 4 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		(int) 5 => 'Jackson
 



 No',
		(int) 6 => 'Erie Railroad Co.',
		(int) 7 => 'New York Life Insurance Company',
		(int) 8 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
		(int) 9 => 'State',
		(int) 10 => 'the District Court',
		(int) 11 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
		(int) 12 => 'Erie Railroad Company',
		(int) 13 => 'New York Life Ins.',
		(int) 14 => 'the Circuit Court of Appeals'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1938',
		(int) 1 => '1938',
		(int) 2 => 'May 16, 1938',
		(int) 3 => 'monthly',
		(int) 4 => '1927',
		(int) 5 => 'semiannual'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Jackson',
		(int) 1 => 'Certiorari',
		(int) 2 => 'Ruhlin',
		(int) 3 => 'Certiorari'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '304',
		(int) 1 => '869',
		(int) 2 => '304',
		(int) 3 => '94',
		(int) 4 => '288',
		(int) 5 => '94'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'Missouri',
		(int) 3 => 'MR'
	),
	'FAC' => array(
		(int) 0 => '288'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '96656',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '304 U.S. 261',
		'appellant' => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1938-05-16',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson - 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 869
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 16, 1938
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 304 U.S. 261
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 Questions of the construction of an insurance policy are to be decided by the federal courts in accordance with the applicable principles of state law.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari granted; 94 F.2d 288 vacated.
 </p>
<p>
 Petition for certiorari to review a Judgment enforcing an insurance policy, on a cross-bill, in a suit to set it aside.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 This suit was brought by petitioner, New York Life Insurance Company, to cancel the reinstatement of an insurance policy upon the ground that it was obtained by fraud. The defendants, the insured and the beneficiary, denied the responsibility of the insured for any misrepresentations
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="262">
 Page 304 U. S. 262
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 by reason of his mental incapacity at the time. They also filed a cross-bill seeking the payment of the monthly disability benefits for which the policy provided. Decree was rendered in favor of defendants on their cross-bill. The decree declared void the reinstatement of the policy, but held it to be in full force from the date of its issue. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 94 F.2d 288.
 </p>
<p>
 The stipulation of facts stated that the insured, at the time of the issue of the policy in 1927, was a resident of Missouri, and that the policy was delivered to the insured in that State. Findings of the District Court followed the stipulation.
 </p>
<p>
 The Circuit Court of Appeals considered the question whether, under the provisions of the policy, the insurer was liable for disability benefits to the insured who became totally and permanently disabled during the period of grace following the date on which a semiannual premium payment fell due where the premium was not paid until after the expiration of the period of grace. The court considered the question as one of general law. Its decision should have been made according to the applicable principles of the state law which governed the interpretation of the policy.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 ;
 <em>
 Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co., ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96673/ruhlin-vs-new-york-life-ins-co">
 304 U. S. 202
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Judgment vacated.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Jackson',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/304/261/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '96656'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			(int) 1 => 'Jackson - 304',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 3 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			(int) 4 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			(int) 5 => 'Jackson
 



 No',
			(int) 6 => 'Erie Railroad Co.',
			(int) 7 => 'New York Life Insurance Company',
			(int) 8 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
			(int) 9 => 'State',
			(int) 10 => 'the District Court',
			(int) 11 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
			(int) 12 => 'Erie Railroad Company',
			(int) 13 => 'New York Life Ins.',
			(int) 14 => 'the Circuit Court of Appeals'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1938',
			(int) 1 => '1938',
			(int) 2 => 'May 16, 1938',
			(int) 3 => 'monthly',
			(int) 4 => '1927',
			(int) 5 => 'semiannual'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Jackson',
			(int) 1 => 'Certiorari',
			(int) 2 => 'Ruhlin',
			(int) 3 => 'Certiorari'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '304',
			(int) 1 => '869',
			(int) 2 => '304',
			(int) 3 => '94',
			(int) 4 => '288',
			(int) 5 => '94'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'Missouri',
			(int) 3 => 'MR'
		),
		'FAC' => array(
			(int) 0 => '288'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '96656',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '304 U.S. 261',
			'appellant' => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1938-05-16',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson - 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 869
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 16, 1938
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 304 U.S. 261
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 Questions of the construction of an insurance policy are to be decided by the federal courts in accordance with the applicable principles of state law.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari granted; 94 F.2d 288 vacated.
 </p>
<p>
 Petition for certiorari to review a Judgment enforcing an insurance policy, on a cross-bill, in a suit to set it aside.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 This suit was brought by petitioner, New York Life Insurance Company, to cancel the reinstatement of an insurance policy upon the ground that it was obtained by fraud. The defendants, the insured and the beneficiary, denied the responsibility of the insured for any misrepresentations
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="262">
 Page 304 U. S. 262
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 by reason of his mental incapacity at the time. They also filed a cross-bill seeking the payment of the monthly disability benefits for which the policy provided. Decree was rendered in favor of defendants on their cross-bill. The decree declared void the reinstatement of the policy, but held it to be in full force from the date of its issue. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 94 F.2d 288.
 </p>
<p>
 The stipulation of facts stated that the insured, at the time of the issue of the policy in 1927, was a resident of Missouri, and that the policy was delivered to the insured in that State. Findings of the District Court followed the stipulation.
 </p>
<p>
 The Circuit Court of Appeals considered the question whether, under the provisions of the policy, the insurer was liable for disability benefits to the insured who became totally and permanently disabled during the period of grace following the date on which a semiannual premium payment fell due where the premium was not paid until after the expiration of the period of grace. The court considered the question as one of general law. Its decision should have been made according to the applicable principles of the state law which governed the interpretation of the policy.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 ;
 <em>
 Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co., ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96673/ruhlin-vs-new-york-life-ins-co">
 304 U. S. 202
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Judgment vacated.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Jackson',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/304/261/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '96656'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		(int) 1 => 'Jackson - 304',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 3 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		(int) 4 => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		(int) 5 => 'Jackson
 



 No',
		(int) 6 => 'Erie Railroad Co.',
		(int) 7 => 'New York Life Insurance Company',
		(int) 8 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
		(int) 9 => 'State',
		(int) 10 => 'the District Court',
		(int) 11 => 'The Circuit Court of Appeals',
		(int) 12 => 'Erie Railroad Company',
		(int) 13 => 'New York Life Ins.',
		(int) 14 => 'the Circuit Court of Appeals'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1938',
		(int) 1 => '1938',
		(int) 2 => 'May 16, 1938',
		(int) 3 => 'monthly',
		(int) 4 => '1927',
		(int) 5 => 'semiannual'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Jackson',
		(int) 1 => 'Certiorari',
		(int) 2 => 'Ruhlin',
		(int) 3 => 'Certiorari'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '304',
		(int) 1 => '869',
		(int) 2 => '304',
		(int) 3 => '94',
		(int) 4 => '288',
		(int) 5 => '94'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'Missouri',
		(int) 3 => 'MR'
	),
	'FAC' => array(
		(int) 0 => '288'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '96656',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '304 U.S. 261',
		'appellant' => 'New York Life Ins. Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'New York Life Ins. Co. Vs. Jackson',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1938-05-16',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson - 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 304 U.S. 261 (1938)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 869
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 16, 1938
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 304 U.S. 261
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 Questions of the construction of an insurance policy are to be decided by the federal courts in accordance with the applicable principles of state law.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari granted; 94 F.2d 288 vacated.
 </p>
<p>
 Petition for certiorari to review a Judgment enforcing an insurance policy, on a cross-bill, in a suit to set it aside.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 This suit was brought by petitioner, New York Life Insurance Company, to cancel the reinstatement of an insurance policy upon the ground that it was obtained by fraud. The defendants, the insured and the beneficiary, denied the responsibility of the insured for any misrepresentations
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="262">
 Page 304 U. S. 262
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 by reason of his mental incapacity at the time. They also filed a cross-bill seeking the payment of the monthly disability benefits for which the policy provided. Decree was rendered in favor of defendants on their cross-bill. The decree declared void the reinstatement of the policy, but held it to be in full force from the date of its issue. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 94 F.2d 288.
 </p>
<p>
 The stipulation of facts stated that the insured, at the time of the issue of the policy in 1927, was a resident of Missouri, and that the policy was delivered to the insured in that State. Findings of the District Court followed the stipulation.
 </p>
<p>
 The Circuit Court of Appeals considered the question whether, under the provisions of the policy, the insurer was liable for disability benefits to the insured who became totally and permanently disabled during the period of grace following the date on which a semiannual premium payment fell due where the premium was not paid until after the expiration of the period of grace. The court considered the question as one of general law. Its decision should have been made according to the applicable principles of the state law which governed the interpretation of the policy.
 <em>
 Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96680/erie-railroad-co-vs-tompkins">
 304 U. S. 64
 </a>
</span>
 ;
 <em>
 Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co., ante,
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/96673/ruhlin-vs-new-york-life-ins-co">
 304 U. S. 202
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Judgment vacated.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Jackson',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/304/261/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '96656'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

ORG: New York Life Ins. Co., Jackson - 304, U.S. Supreme Court, New York Life Ins. Co., New York Life Ins. Co., Jackson No, Erie Railroad Co., New York Life Insurance Company, The Circuit Court of Appeals, State, the District Court, The Circuit Court of Appeals, Erie Railroad Company, New York Life Ins., the Circuit Court of Appeals

DATE: 1938, 1938, May 16, 1938, monthly, 1927, semiannual

PERSON: Jackson, Certiorari, Ruhlin, Certiorari

CARDINAL: 304, 869, 304, 94, 288, 94

GPE: U.S., U.S., Missouri, MR

FAC: 288