Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Orient Poles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Appeals
Decided On : Apr-05-2013
Court : Chennai
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 35F Central Excise Act, Section 85, the Finance Act, Section 35F Central Excise Act, Section 85, the Finance Act, Section 65, the Finance Act, Section 65(39a, the Finance Act, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Section 83, the Finance Act
PERSON: JUDICATURE, V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Certiorari, Appeal Order No.163, V.S. Manoj, M.Santhanaraman, V.S. Manoj, M.Santhanaraman, Order-in-Original Nos.81, Law, ELT, Mahatma Gandhi Road
CARDINAL: 04.2013, 432, 2011(M, 432, 2011(M, 82, 24.05.2010, 163, 07.02.2013, 28.02.2013, 28.02.2013, 235, 23.(Trendy
ORG: HONOURABLE, Velachery Main Road Sankaran Avenue, Central Excise (Appeals, Department, the Additional Commissioner of Service Tax, Service Tax Commissionerate, Chennai, 5/2010-TRU, Erection, Commissioning or Installation, Stay Petition, Pre-Deposit-cum-Appeal Order Nos, MST, Service Tax under Erection, Commissioning or Installation, Central Excise (Appeals, Court, Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, Court, the Supreme Court, the Writ Petition, Central Excise (Appeals
DATE: 4526, 1944, 1994, 1944, 1994, 2011, 1994, Rs.27,79,511/- + Rs.33,02,028/-, 2009, a period of, two weeks, four weeks
GPE: A.No, A.No
WORK_OF_ART: The Show Cause Notices, Erection, Commissioning or Installation
LOC: A.No.432/20112
PRODUCT: Rs.25, Rs.25
NORP: Rs.25