Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Orient Poles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Appeals

Decided On : Apr-05-2013

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 35F Central Excise Act, Section 85, the Finance Act, Section 35F Central Excise Act, Section 85, the Finance Act, Section 65, the Finance Act, Section 65(39a, the Finance Act, Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, Section 83, the Finance Act

PERSON: JUDICATURE, V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Certiorari, Appeal Order No.163, V.S. Manoj, M.Santhanaraman, V.S. Manoj, M.Santhanaraman, Order-in-Original Nos.81, Law, ELT, Mahatma Gandhi Road

CARDINAL: 04.2013, 432, 2011(M, 432, 2011(M, 82, 24.05.2010, 163, 07.02.2013, 28.02.2013, 28.02.2013, 235, 23.(Trendy

ORG: HONOURABLE, Velachery Main Road Sankaran Avenue, Central Excise (Appeals, Department, the Additional Commissioner of Service Tax, Service Tax Commissionerate, Chennai, 5/2010-TRU, Erection, Commissioning or Installation, Stay Petition, Pre-Deposit-cum-Appeal Order Nos, MST, Service Tax under Erection, Commissioning or Installation, Central Excise (Appeals, Court, Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, Court, the Supreme Court, the Writ Petition, Central Excise (Appeals

DATE: 4526, 1944, 1994, 1944, 1994, 2011, 1994, Rs.27,79,511/- + Rs.33,02,028/-, 2009, a period of, two weeks, four weeks

GPE: A.No, A.No

WORK_OF_ART: The Show Cause Notices, Erection, Commissioning or Installation

LOC: A.No.432/20112

PRODUCT: Rs.25, Rs.25

NORP: Rs.25

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //