Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr.P.G.Viswanathan Vs. Director of Income Tax

Decided On : Jan-04-2013

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 158-BC/Sec.158-BD, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 158-BC/SEc.158-BD, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 158-BC/SEc.158-BD, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 158-BC/SEc.158-BD, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 158-BD, Section 158-BD, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 132(b)(1, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132(1, Section 132(1, section 132(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 132(1, Section 132 of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Income Tax Act, Section 34, Section 34 of the Act of, Section 147 of the Act of, the American Constitution, Article 19, Section 132A, Section 132 A, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132(1, section 132(1, Section 132(1, section 132(1, section 132(1, Section 132, section 132(1, section 132(1, Section 132 of the Act, Section 132, section 132(1, Section 132 of the Act, Section 132 of the Act, article 226, Section 132, section 132, section 132, Section 132(1, the IT Act, Section 132, Section 132(1, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Central Excise Act, the Division Bench, NAND LAL TAHILIANI Vs, Section 132A, the Income Tax Act 1961, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 132(1, Section 132 of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 132(1, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 132, Section 132, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 132 of the Act, Rule 112, Section 132(1, Section 24, Section 147, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 147, the Income Tax Act, Section 148, Section 132 of the Act, the Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, the Income Tax Act, ITR 50.(SC, Article 19(1)(f, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act and Rule 112, the Constitution of India.29, section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132(1, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.30, Section 132.52, Section 132, Section 132, Section 132.55, Section 132, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, the Income Tax Act

PERSON: JUDICATURE, Mahatma Gandhi Road, N.V.Nagasubramaniam, Pramod, Mahatma Gandhi Road, AR.L.Sundaresan, Pramod, Mahatma Gandhi Road, AR.L.Sundaresan, Pramod, Aruna Viswanathan, Mahatma Gandhi Road, AR.L.Sundaresan, Pramod, Anjana Viswanathan, Mahatma Gandhi Road, AR.L.Sundaresan, Pramod, Vikram Viswanathan, Mahatma Gandhi Road, AR.L.Sundaresan, Pramod, P.G.Viswanathan, Aruna, Anjana, P.G.Viswanathan, Govind Singh Road, P.G.Viswanathan, P.G.Viswanathan, Act.4, W.P.Nos.1280, Aruna Viswanathan, Anjana Viswanathan, P.G.Viswanathan, Vikram Viswanathan, P.G.Viswanathan, Govind Singh Road, Govind Singh Road, P.G.Viswanathan, P.G.Viswanthan, Bangalore, Ramakrishanan, Singh Vs, Kumar Jaiswal, Kumar Jaiswal, Nand Lal Tahiliani Vs, Sahai, Maheshwari, Vindhya Metal Corpn, Janak Raj Sharma Vs, R.D. Shah, Ajit Jain, Sushil Rastogi Vs, Nand Lal Tahiliani Vs, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Law C. Javeri V. K.K.Sen, K.P. Varghese v. ITO, Vadodra v., Articles, MAHESH, Apparasu Ravi, Govind Singh Road, Perambalur, Perambalur

CARDINAL: 1-2013, 1, 121, 13.9.2002, 1, 121, 1, 121, 1, 121, 8357, 1, 121, 1, 121, one, 158, 12.9.2002, 158, 158, 2, 6F, 12.1, 12.2, 196.SC 523.it, 12.3, one, 12.4, 198.SC 185.it, 12.5, 71, two, 12.6, 156, 115, 47.(All, 12.7, 39, 139, 156, 3, 12.8, 59, two, No.2, No.2, 39, 74, 46......., 12.9, 215, 132, No.1, 131, 4, 12.10, 117, 71, 550.a, 12.11, 129, 12.12, 128, 170, 12.13, 132, 56, 19.(SC, 82, 12.14, 133, 18, 12.15, 17, 114, 132, 12.16, 12.17, 4, 173, 4, 599, 2, 127, 13, 39, 156, 091, 117, 133, 1961.20, 32, 17, 11.(BOM, 59, 30.9.1975, 112, 16, 3, 1961.28, 339, 63.(GUJ, 262, 338, 23.12.2010, 23.12.2010, 194, 3.(L.R.Gupta, 34, 1961.36, 1, ten, 2.The, 1-2013

DATE: 2003, 25071, 2003, 3363, 24564, 2005, 2003, 67A, 12.9.2002, 2003, 67A, 12.9.2002, 2005, 67A, 1961, 11.2.2003, 2005, 67A, 1961, 11.2.2003, 2005, 67A, 1961, 4653, 11.2.2003, 2005, 67A, 1961, 11.2.2003, 2003, 1961, 12.9.2002, 2003, 2003, 1961, 8.11.2002, 1961, W.P.No.1279 of 2005, 2003, 1281, 2005, 12.9.2002, 13.9.2002, 1961, 1961, 11.2.2003, 1961, 1961, 1961, 2003, the assessment year, 1990-91, 1962, 1961, 1961, quashed.11, 1961, 196.SC 372.it, 1922, 1922, 197.SC 1753(1, the particular year, 1922, 1948, 1961, 1969, 919850, 1978, 1988, 1985, 1983, 104.(All, 1985, 1991, section 31, 1995, 2001, "12, 1969, 2003, 74, 2003, 1988, 2003, 1965, 1971, 2003, 2012, 2003, 1961, 1788, 1981, 1999, 2002, 1988, 1985, 1997, 2001, 1961, 1961, 2003, 1987, 1961, 2012, 1991, 1961, 1975, 1961, 1975, 1975, 1962, 2005, 1961, 1975, 1973, 1961, 1962, 1961, 2011, 2010, 13.4.2010, 2010, 2010, 1992, 1961, 1961, 1961, 12.9.2002, 13.9.2002, a period of, eight weeks, 2003, 1282

GPE: W.P.M.P.No.24563, Nungambakkam, Nungambakkam, Nungambakkam, Nungambakkam, Nungambakkam, Nungambakkam, Rs.2,20,560/-, Vinod, Vinod, believe&quot, believe&quot, suspect&quot, W.B., DR, Bombay, Clauses, seizure.40, authorities.42, J.csh, Fort St. George, College Road, College Road

ORG: Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax Central Circle IV, Coimbatore, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax Central Circle IV, Coimbatore, 8.11.2002, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax Central Circle IV, Coimbatore-641018, PAN/GIR, V.704/AC/CCIV/CBE, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax Central Circle IV, Coimbatore-641018, PAN/GIR, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax Central Circle IV, Coimbatore-641018, PAN/GIR, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax Central Circle IV, Coimbatore-641018, PAN/GIR, AEFPV 478 K, Income Tax, Coimbatore, Vikram Hospital, Coimbatore, Vikram, Vikram Audio Centre, Coimbatore, Vikram Hospital, No.69, Coimbatore, Vikram Hospital, Vikram Hospital, No.69, Coimbatore, Coimbatore, Vikram Hospital, No.69, Coimbatore, Income Tax, Coimbatore, Sections 158-BD, Coimbatore, Vikram Hospital, No.69, Coimbatore, Court, the Income Tax Rules, Vikram Hospital, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd., Lakhmani Mewal Das, AIR, AIR, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Search, Vindhya Metal Corporation Vs, Vinod Kumar, Calcutta, Court, Manju Tandon, ITR, Income-Tax, Ganga Prasad, CIT, ITR, Ganga Prasad Maheshwari's, CIT, income.4, Union of India, the Supreme Court, ITO V. Seth Bros.[1969, Court, Court, Legislature, CBI, Court, Inspection (Investigation, Inspection (Investigation, Union of India, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, High Courts, Sections 132 and 148 of the Act, un, Union of India Vs, CIT, ITR, the Supreme Court, Union of India Vs, ACC, Ellerman Lines Ltd., CIT, CBDT, Kavita Agarwal Vs, not "reason, Space Wood Furnishers, Income Tax (Investigation, Pune, Taxmann.com, Joint, Instruction No.7, Income-Tax, Supp, Department, UCO Bank, CIT, Collector of Central Excise, Dhiren Chemical Industries, the Allahabad High Court, VINDHYA MATEL CORPORATION Vs, the Allahabad High Court, VINDHYA METAL CORPN, SC, the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, UNION OF INDIA, Court, the Apex Court, the High Courts, Sections 132 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Allahabad High Court, SMT, KAVITA AGARWAL Vs, INCOME TAX, PAWAN SOLVENT &amp, CHEMICALS Vs, the High Court of Patna, the Bombay High Court, UNION OF INDIA, DELHI, the Delhi High Court, Court, Court, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, CBDT, the Income Tax Rules, the Income Tax, the Income Tax Rules, the Income Tax (Investigation, Chennai, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax (Investigation, Income Tax (Investigation, the Supreme Court, INCOME TAX MAYUR, the Supreme Court, the Income Tax Rules, the Income Tax Rules, the High Court, HEMENDRA, MUMBAI Vs, the Gujarat High Court, DIPIN G.PATEL, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Income Tax Vs, Court, the Delhi High Court, ITR, Union of India, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Coimbatore, Vikram Hospital, No.69, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, School Education Department, School Education, School Education

WORK_OF_ART: a Writ of Declaration, a Writ of Declaration, a Writ of Declaration, a Writ of Declaration, a Writ of Declaration, a Writ of Declaration, Pillai Vs, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

NORP: Central Circle, Central Circle, overruled.33

LOC: an E.N.T Surgeon, West Venkatasamy Road, West Venkatasamy Road, West Venkatasamy Road, West Venkatasamy Road, illegal.12, West Venkatasamy Road

QUANTITY: 4303 grams, 10 kgs

PRODUCT: Vs, Calcutta, Vs, 305, 373, 30.7.2003

EVENT: the Fourth Amendment

FAC: Perambalur District 5, Perambalur District

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //