Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

American Tel. and Tel. Co. Vs. United States

Decided On : Dec-07-1936

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Communications Act, the Communications Act, the Communications Act, The Communications Act, Instruction 3 (S. 1, Instruction 3 (S. 1, the Communications Act

NORP: American, §, F.Supp, c. 652, §, F.Supp, §, §, §, §, §

GPE: United States -, United States, United States, U.S., NEW YORK, the United States, the United States, New York, the United States, Kansas City Southern Ry, United States, United States, Kansas City Southern Ry, United States, Kansas City Southern Ry, United States, the United States, Kansas, United States, United States, United States, United States, Ohio, Lindheimer, United States, Kentucky, United States, United States, MR

ORG: U.S. 232 (, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 232 (, American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Syllabus, the Federal Communications Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, Page 299 U. S. 233 , Commission, the Adjustment Account, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, Commission, the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, Court, the Federal Communications Commission, Bell, the Federal Communications Commission, the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, a District Court, The District Court, Court, Norfolk & Western Ry, Commission, Interstate Commerce Comm'n, Goodrich Transit Co., Telephone Plant in Service, Telephone Plant under Construction, Telephone Plant Acquisition Adjustment, Telephone Plant Acquisition Adjustment, Commission, Bell, the American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Dayton Power & Light Co. v., Public Utilities Comm'n, Western Distributing Co. v. Public Service Comm'n of, Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, Telephone Division Order No, Commission, Addy Co., New York Edison Co., N.Y. 103, the Public Service Commission of New York, Commission, Commission, Commission, Page 299 U. S. 243 , Commission, Commission, Norfolk & Western Ry, Commission, Commission, Telephone Plant Acquisition Adjustment, Commission, Commission, Telephone Plant in Service, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Hygrade Provision Co., Commission, Dayton Power & Light Co. v., Public Utilities Comm'n, Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission, International Harvester Co., Cohen Grocery Co., N.Y. 463, N.E. 177, Hygrade Provision Co., Court, Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v., Public Utilities Comm'n, Commission

DATE: 1936, 1936, November 16, 17, 1936, December 7, 1936, 1934, 1934, 1934, June 19, 1934, 1064, 1934, January 1, 1913, January 1, 1933, 1934, June 19, 1935, January 1, 1936, 1064, 1093, 47a, 287 U. S. 134, 282 U. S. 133, June 19, 1935, 1934, 1934, years

PERSON: American Tel, Smith, Hicklin, Coney, Maltbie, Div, Sherman, Nash, People v. Mancuso, Sherman, 3-S. 1

CARDINAL: 299, 299, 1, 2, 3, 1, 237, 2, 3, 4, 5, 502, 6, 4, 323, 1, 2, 3, 5, one, 6, 14, 121, 235, 48, 47, 151, forty-four, thirty-seven, seven, forty-six, 20(5, 47, 28, 47, three, Five, two, One, 14, 121, 48, 47, 38, 219, 220, 28, Four, 100.1, 100.2, 100.3, 100.4, 100.1, three, 100.4, 100.4, thirty-seven, Seven, 100.4, 100.4, 100.4, 100.4, 100.4, 100.4, 685, 281, 223, 271, 2, 277, 100.4, one, 100.4, 613, 675, 675, 172, 100.4, 100.1, 100.4, one, 502, 100.4, 2(B.1, 323, 81, 280, 280, 255, 470, 175, 100.1, 100.3, 103

ORDINAL: first, third, second, third, First, first, second, third, fourth, first, second, first, first

LOC: the Southern District

PERCENT: 224 U. S. 194, 234 U. S. 216

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //