Swinson Vs. Chicago, St.P., Minneapolis and Omaha Ry. Co.

Decided On : Mar-11-1935

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: The Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act, The Safety Appliance Act, the Safety Appliance Act

PERSON: Swinson, Omaha Ry, Swinson, Omaha Ry, Swinson, Omaha Railway, Swinson, Swinson, Swinson, Swinson, Certiorari, Davis, Swinson, Swinson, Didinger, c.196

GPE: Chicago, St.P., Minneapolis, U.S., Chicago, St.P., Minneapolis, U.S., Chicago, St. Paul, U.S., U.S., Chicago, St. Paul, Minnesota

CARDINAL: 294, 294, 383, 294, 1, 2, 72, 649, 293, 546, 72, 649, 6, 784, 39, 798, 4, 27, 531

DATE: 1935, 1935, February 6, 7, 1935, March 11, 1935, 292 U. S. 589, March 2, 1893

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Minneapolis &, Omaha Railway Co. , THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, the Federal Employers' Liability Act, the Safety Appliance Acts, the Federal Employers' Liability Act, Court, Minneapolis &, the Federal Employers' Liability Act, District Court, Congress, The Circuit Court of Appeals, Court, Meredith, Court, Compare Lehigh Valley R. Co., Howell, Pennsylvania R. Co., the Federal Safety Appliance Act, the Interstate Commerce Commission

PRODUCT: Certiorari

QUANTITY: a few inches