Semler Vs. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-01-1935

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Fourteenth Amendment, Article I of the Constitution of the United States

GPE: Semler, U.S., Oregon, Portland, Maryland, Missouri, Minnesota, West Virginia, N.Y., Ohio

ORG: Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON, Syllabus, State, Court, the State Board of Dental Examiners, the Supreme Court, Union Dry Goods Co., Georgia Public Service Comm'n, Binford, Wilson, State Board, State Board of Dental Examiners, U.S. 563, Purity Extract & Tonic Co., Hebe Co., Shaw, Pierce Oil Corp., Village of Euclid, Ambler Realty Co.

DATE: 1935, March 7, 1935, April 1, 1935, Ore. 50, 1933, 1918, 287 U. S. 251

PERSON: Semler, CHIEF JUSTICE, Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., Sproles, Stephenson, Watson, Miller, Hurwitz v. North, Bloom Dentist, Cruise, Douglas, Graves, Booth

CARDINAL: 294, 538, 1, 2, 3, 4, 148, 34, 311, 166, 208, 179, 288, 588, 90, 8, 287, 259, 358, 363, 182, 500

PERCENT: 240 U. S. 342, 236 U. S. 373, 129 U. S. 114, 272 U. S. 365

PRODUCT: N.E. 16