Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Snyder Vs. Commissioner
Decided On : Apr-29-1935
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: the Revenue Act, Article 58, the Revenue Act, the Revenue Act, the Revenue Act, Regulations 74, Article 105 of Regulations No. 74
PERSON: Snyder v. Commissioner - 295, Snyder v. Commissioner, Snyder v. Commissioner, Reg, Art, Helvering v. Rankin, Helvering v. Rankin, Snyder, Snyder, Snyder, Helvering, Rankin , Snyder, Snyder, Compare Dalton v. Bowers, Burnet v. Clark, Washburn, Bedell, Mente v. Eisner, Snyder, Hays v., 286 U. S. 244 , Snyder, Snyder, Snyder, Helvering v. Rankin, Elliott v. Commissioner, Compare Black v. Bolen, Rogers, Kunau, Thiele v. Commissioner, Vaughan v. Commissioner, Keeney v. Commissioner, Stern v. Commissioner, Lowell v. Commissioner, Brendle v. Commissioner, Snyder
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., Lucas, United States, MR, United States
DATE: 1935, 1935, March 15, 1935, April 29, 1935, 58, his business day, 1928, previous years, the year, year, the year, the year, 39, 74, 1928, previous years, the calendar year 1928, 1928, earlier years, 39, January 1, 1928, the tax year 10,600, the year, 1928, the taxable year, year, the taxable year, the year, 287 U. S. 404, his business day, the year 1928, 1928, the year, previous years, the year, 63, the current year, previous years, the current year, previous years, the year, the year, each year, 1928, the year, 1928, 1818, 1304, 1031, 55, 1928, annual, 1297, 1188, the year, the year
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE THIRD CIRCUIT, Syllabus, Treasury, Court, the Board of Tax Appeals, United Gas Improvement Company, The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, The Board of Tax Appeals, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, the Board of Tax Appeals, United Gas Improvement Company, Snyder, Snyder, Board, Snyder, Court, Burnet v., Sanford & Brooks Co., Woolford Realty Co., the Board of Tax Appeals, Snyder, Department, Board, U.G.I., Board, Court, Snyder, Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co., Gauley Mountain Coal Co., MacLaughlin v. Alliance Insurance Co., L. & T. Co., Burnet v. Sanford &, Brooks Page, Kansas City Structural Steel Co., United States Cartridge Co., U.G.I., The Board of Tax Appeals, the Court of Appeals, Board, Schwinn, Hodgson v. Commissioner, Schermerhorn, B.T.A., Board, Spring City Foundry Co., Washington Land Co., Atlantic Coast Realty Co., Compare Harriman National Bank, Pan-American Bank & Trust Co., Adirondack Securities Corp., Northeastern Surety Co., Fried v. Commissioner
CARDINAL: 295, 663, 295, 1, 2, 22, 3, 111, 4, 5, 73, 5, 294, 29, 111, 29, 73, 5, 5,300, 7,900, 8,000, 100, 111, 1, more than one, 51, 949, 2, 30, 622, 624, 266, 161, 22, 111, 184, 15, 3, 4, 6, 1, 2, 9, 15, 494, 24, 256, 26, 268, 41, 865, 27, 509, 32, 134, 39, 459, 12, 265, 31, 548, 17, 560, 4, 10, 503, 11, 416, 14, 838, 5, 41, 6, 43, 950, 5, 839, 23, 61, 29, 297, 30, 31, 638, 31, 1,500, one, two, 1,500
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, First, first, first, first, Second, first, first, Third, Fourth, first, Fifth, first, first
NORP: §, §, §, §, §
PRODUCT: Certiorari, C.B. 39
MONEY: 38,961.22, 501,865.59, 932,822.67, 43,692, 39,682, 1,897.77
PERCENT: 282 U. S. 359 , 287 U. S. 410 , 247 U. S. 179 , 247 U. S. 189 , 282 U. S. 359, 292 U. S. 182
EVENT: the 1928 Act