Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mehta Charitable Prajnalay Trust

Decided On : Nov-20-2012

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 260A, Section 11, the Income Tax Act, Section 11, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4, Section 11, Section 143(3, Section 11(4, Section 11(4A, Section 11, Section 11(4, Section 11(4A, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4, Section 11(4A, Section 11, the Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(4, Section 11, Section 4(3)(i, Section 4(3)(ia, Section 4(3)(i, Section 11(4, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 11(1, Section 11(4, Section 11(1, Section 4(3)(i, Section 4(3)(i, Section 11(1, ITR 967.the Assam and Nagaland High Court, Section 11(1, Section 11, Section 11(1, Chapter V of the Act, Section 60, Section 61, Section 62, Section 61, Section 11(4A, Section 11(4A, Section 2(15

DATE: September, 2012 Date, November, 2012, 1050/2011, 1051/2011, 1961, years, 1994-95, 2001-02, 2005-06, 1992-93, the year 1972, the year 1978, monthly, the years 1989 and 1991, year 1989-90, year, the assessment year 1990-91, the assessment year 1989-90, 1995, the assessment year 1992-93, the first assessment year, 1980, year 1992-93, 20, the assessment year 1992-93, daily, a year, 1978, 01.04.1987, 31.12.1991, monthly, the assessment year 1989-90, 2001, 1993-94, 1994-95, 2001-02, 2005-06, the assessment year 1992-93, all the years, the previous year, 2005-06, 1991, 1944, 1922, 1957, 1964, 1953, 1998, the assessment year 1992-93, the assessment year 1992-93, the year 1972, 15.06.1945, a period of, 20 years, the year 1972, 1963, 1957, 1922, 1970, Section 11(1, the assessment year 1992-93, 1972, five years, the year 1978, monthly, 2011, 1973, NOVEMBER 20 2012

CARDINAL: 417/2003, 18/2004, 770/2011, seven, 2, two, 2,200/-, 19, 08.02.1973, two, 213, two, 62,86,390/-, 121, 4A, 19, 2,200/-, two, 19 and 20, 25,000/-, 2,100/-, 19, only one, 30.09.1996, 247, 78.(SC, 4, 1, 2, 3, 3A, 12, two, two, two, two, 32, 53, 121, 1.a, five, 19 and 20, 19, 20, two, 19, 20, 2,100/-, 08.02.1973, 10.09.1945, 3, 3, 3, 2,100/-, 2,100/-, 50, 31, 77, 60 to 63, 08.02.1973, 25,000/-, 50,000/-, 31.12.1991, one, 243, 131, 411

ORG: ITA, ITA, ITA, ITA, ITA, JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, ITA No.722/2007, Tribunal, CIT, Tribunal, Trust, ITA No.722/2007, the Mehta Charitable Prajanalay Trust, M/s. Bishan Das Girdharilal, Shankar Trading Co., P) Ltd., the CIT (Appeals, the Board of Directors, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, the CIT (Appeals, Thanthi Trust v., the Board of Directors, the Supreme Court, CIT, Thanthi Trust, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, Thanthi Trust, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, Shankar Trading Co., the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, The CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, ITA No.3633/Del/96, Tribunal, ITA No.3641/Del/94, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, ITA No.3633/Del/1996, the Supreme Court, Thanthi Trust, Finance, the Lahore High Court, Gadodia Swadeshi Stores, Income Tax, ITR, The Lahore High Court, the Lahore High Court, the Supreme Court, J.K. Trust, the Supreme Court, J.K. Trust, CIT, the Supreme Court, the Lahore High Court, Maxwell, Income Tax, ITR, the Supreme Court, the CIT (Appeals, The CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, The CIT (Appeals, Himachal Pradesh, J.K. Trust, CIT, The Supreme Court, J.K. Trust, the J.K. Trust, J.K. Trust, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Exhibits A, Himachal Pradesh, Vanikam, ITR 79.a, Income Tax, Bihar & Orissa, ITR, Patna High Court, the Indian Income Tax Act, Income Tax, the Patna High Court, Court, Jorhat Races, the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, Shankar Trading Co., P) Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, Income Tax (Exemption, CTR, The Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, Thanthi Trust, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Thanthi Trust, the Supreme Court, Thanthi Trust, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, S. RAVINDRA BHAT

PERSON: Abhishek Maratha, Anshul Sharma, Kamal Sawhney, Ajay Vohra, Kavita Jha, Somnath Shukla, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR, No.(a, B. D. Mehta, Raj Kumar Mehta, Mahesh Udyog, Mahesh Nagar, Addl, Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers, w. e. f. assessment, w. e. f. 01.04.1992, w. e. f. 01.04.1992, Krishna Warriar, Subbarao, Surat Art Silk, Exhibit B. There, Exhibit B., Raja P. C. Lall, P.K. Barooah, w. e. f. 01.01.1992, w. e. f. 01.04.1987, Sahu Jain Trust, Stewart, Sam Antonio School District Vs

GPE: A.Y., Katha, Katha, Katha, Delhi, Katha, Tamil, Katha, Delhi, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, India, Katha, Addl, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Mahesh Udyog, Katha, England, Bombay, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Thiagesar, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, Katha, US

NORP: Indian, Hindu, Indian, Punjab, Gujarat, Indian, newspaper.23, Indian

LOC: District Una

ORDINAL: first, third, firstly, secondly

MONEY: No.2) Act

EVENT: the 1922 Act

PRODUCT: 226.the

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //