Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Vs. India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd and anr

Decided On : Apr-29-2013

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Lease Agreement of property, Section 4, the PP Act, Section 4, the P.P. Act, Section 11, the PP Act, the PP Act, the Estate Officers, the PP Act, the Rent Control Act, the PP Act, the PP Act, Section 3(b, the PP Act, Section 4, Section 4, the PP Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 4, Section 4, the PP Act, Section 4, Section 2(g, the PP Act, Section 4(2)(a, the PP Act, Section 4(2, the PP Act, the PP Act, Section 3(b, Section 4, the PP Act, Section 4, the PP Act, the PP Act, the PP Act, the PP Act, Section 3, the Constitution Bench, Section 4, Article 226, Section 4

DATE: April, 2013, October, 2012, 5011/2010, 14th June, 2010, 1st July 2010, 1971, about the year 1988, 19th February, 2002, a period of, nine years w.e.f, February, 2002, 31st January, 2011, nine years, 1st February 2011 to 31st January, 2020, 1996, 1996, 14th June, 2010, 29th June, 2010, 1996, 23rd May 2011, 23rd May, 2011, September, 2011, 29th September, 2011, 14th June, 2010, 19th February, 2002, 14th June, 2010, 19th February, 2002, 5373/2012, 29th September, 2011, 30th May, 2002, 8th June, 2002, 2008, 14th June, 2010, 70, 21st February, 2006, 1998, 19th February, 2002, 8th February, 2012, 11374/2006, 19th February, 2002, 2011-2012, 14th May, 2012, 30th May, 2002, six months, 1989, 1975, 1983, 1983, 1996, 30th May, 2002, 30th May, 2002, 2012, 23rd July, 2003, 2011, four weeks of today, APRIL 29 2013

CARDINAL: 788/2012, 30, No.2, 1, No.1, 1, 17, three, No.1, 33/2011, 29, 6, 1, 36, 3, 25, 199.Bombay 375, 34, 200.Delhi, 87, 976/2004, 14,15 and 19, 8, 5, 2, 14, one, 24, 6, 8, 1, No.2, 2, 4, 4, 29.also, 3, only two, 198.Delhi 347

ORG: MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD, INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ANR, Adv, Adv, intra court, ITDC, the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants, ITDC, ITDC, ITDC, the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Arbitration, Indian Council of Arbitration, ITDC, ITDC, ITDC, ITDC, ITDC, ITDC, Arbitration Petition No, Court, ITDC, ITDC this, Court, ITDC, ITDC, the Arbitration Petition No, ITDC, Arbitration Petition, Estate, the Arbitral Tribunal, ITDC, ITDC, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, ITDC, ITDC, SLP, the Supreme Court, Public Premises, the Government of India, Public Sector Undertaking / Financial Institutions, the Public Authorities, Public Authorities, Syndicate Bank Vs, no.2 Estate Officer, New India Assurance Company Ltd Vs, Nulsi Neville Wadia, Union of India AIR, Naseeruddin Vs, Nulsi Neville Wadia, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, I., Estate, Guidelines, Escorts Heart Institute, Research Centre Ltd. Vs, DDA AIR, the Supreme Court, Government, ITDC, DDA, the Supreme Court, Express Newspapers Pvt, Union of India AIR 198.872, Division Bench, Court, LPA, DDA Vs, Co. Pvt Ltd., the Supreme Court, N., ITDC, Court, ITDC, Estate, Guidelines, Estate, Ocean Plastics & Fibres, Delhi Development Authority, Nulsi Neville Wadia, Guidelines, the Public Authority, the Twentieth Report of the Standing Committee on Urban Development, the Lok Sabha, Guidelines, Committee, Guidelines, AIR 198.J&K 1.where, Municipal Corporation, Guidelines, The Supreme Court, Cooper Engineering Limited, P.P. Mundhe, the Industrial Adjudicator, the High Court, Delhi Administration, The Supreme Court, National Council for Cement and, the High Court, the High Court, the Industrial Adjudicator, Court, Estate, Guidelines, Estate, Court, the Arbitration Petition, SLP, the Supreme Court, Express Newspaper, Guidelines, DLT 741.International Building & Furnishing Co. Pvt, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Indian Institute of Public Opinion Pvt. Ltd., Life Insurance Corporation of India MANU/DE/2031/2012, National Bank, National Bank, Guidelines, Suffice, Guidelines, Guidelines, the Standing Committee on Urban Development, the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants, Estate Officers, the Central Government, Estate Officers, Government, Estate, the Supreme Court, Ashoka Marketing Limited Vs, National Bank, Court, Safari Airways Vs, Estate, Estate, Estate, Court, Estate, Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India Vs, The Supreme Court, Delhi Development Authority, ITDC

PERSON: Appellant Through, A.M. Singhvi, T.K. Ganju, A.K. Thakur, R.K. Mishra, Aquib Ali, C.M. Oberoi, Surekha Raman, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, WP(C, Lessee, Gazette, Ramachandran Pillai 2011, Minoo Framroze Balsara Vs, DE/3150/2010, Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Yash Paul Gupta Vs, S.S. Anand, Gurnam Kaur, Mahesh Chandra, Damyanti Verma 188, Pearey Lal & Sons Pvt, Bill, Gazette Officers, Kunisetty Satyanarayana, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.CHIEF JUSTICE

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, the Central Govt

PRODUCT: no.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, No.1, Maheshwari, Report, Report

GPE: New Delhi, Delhi, India, Haryana

FAC: Naraina Industrial Area, S.K. Verma Vs, the Official Gazette

NORP: Rules, D., addressee, K., d., D.P., Rs.25000/-

ORDINAL: second, third

WORK_OF_ART: Ambitious Gold Nib Pvt Ltd, S.S. Khera Vs