Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Burnet Vs. Clark

Decided On : Dec-12-1932

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Clark No, the Revenue Act

PERSON: Clark - 287, Clark, Certiorari, Clark, Clark, alter ego

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., District of Columbia

DATE: 1932, 1932, November 14, 1932, December 12, 1932, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1921, years, 59, 1031, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1921, 61 App.D.C. 217, 59, 1031, 1899, 1922, 1921 and 1922, 1917, 1921, 1922, 1921, that year, the same year, 1922, years, 1923, 1921, 1922, 1921, 1922, those years, 1921, 1922, 1031, 1032, 1921, the taxable year, the taxable year, December 31, 1920, year, year, taxable year

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Board of Tax Appeals, McREYNOLDS, Court, the Board of Tax Appeals, The Court of Appeals, Board, the Bowers Southern Dredging Company, the Bowers Company, the Bowers Company, The Board of Tax Appeals, Bowers Company, the Bowers Company, Bowers Company, Bowers Company, the District Court of Appeals, the Board of Tax Appeals

CARDINAL: 287, 180, 287, 204, 19, 136, 42, 227, 231, 1905, three, 204, 214, 234, 1, 2, 2, 214, 2, 234, 3, 4, 6, 234, 5

PRODUCT: 859

MONEY: 17,000, about $5,000, 68,000, 9,500, 92,500, 68,000

NORP: §

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //