Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Burnet Vs. Clark
Decided On : Dec-12-1932
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: Clark No, the Revenue Act
PERSON: Clark - 287, Clark, Certiorari, Clark, Clark, alter ego
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., District of Columbia
DATE: 1932, 1932, November 14, 1932, December 12, 1932, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1921, years, 59, 1031, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1921, 61 App.D.C. 217, 59, 1031, 1899, 1922, 1921 and 1922, 1917, 1921, 1922, 1921, that year, the same year, 1922, years, 1923, 1921, 1922, 1921, 1922, those years, 1921, 1922, 1031, 1032, 1921, the taxable year, the taxable year, December 31, 1920, year, year, taxable year
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Board of Tax Appeals, McREYNOLDS, Court, the Board of Tax Appeals, The Court of Appeals, Board, the Bowers Southern Dredging Company, the Bowers Company, the Bowers Company, The Board of Tax Appeals, Bowers Company, the Bowers Company, Bowers Company, Bowers Company, the District Court of Appeals, the Board of Tax Appeals
CARDINAL: 287, 180, 287, 204, 19, 136, 42, 227, 231, 1905, three, 204, 214, 234, 1, 2, 2, 214, 2, 234, 3, 4, 6, 234, 5
PRODUCT: 859
MONEY: 17,000, about $5,000, 68,000, 9,500, 92,500, 68,000
NORP: §