Anant Prasad and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Decided On : Jan-24-2013

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 4, section 4, section 8.9, Section 21, the Indian Penal Code, Section 19, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 2, Section 6-B and Section 7, Rule 8, Rule 8, section 6-B of the Bombay Home Guards Act and Rule 10 and Rule 8, Section 9, a Division Bench, Section 2, Rule 8, Section 19, the Constitution Bench, Constitution, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 16 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench

DATE: January 02, 2013, January 24, 2013 +, 3126/2001, the year 1946, 1947, the year 1959, 1947, the year 1959, 1959, the age of 20 years, the age of 60 years, three years, one months, the age of sixty year, the year 1995, between the years 1978 and 1995, 1985, March 21, 1997, May 26, 1978, December, 1946, three years, 1947, 1959, 20th July, 1959, the age of twenty years, the age of sixty years, three years, one month's, Para 7.1, three years, 30th July, 1991, one month's, one month's, three years, three years, three years, several years, almost about twenty years, a period of, six months, 11, April 18, 2000, April 18, 2000, 1959, three years, 9879, 1.12.99, more than 3 years, 15 years, the 3 years, three years, 3 years, more than six months, six months, 3 years, 3 years, the year 2001, between the years 1978 to 1993, the year 1999/2000, about 15-20 years, more than 240 days, every year, 1947, April 18, 2000, May 26, 1999, April 18, 2000, May 26, 1999, three years, more than 15/20 years, 3 years, the age of 60 years, 122674-74, 2002, 1947, 1947, 1959, 1947, April 29, 2002, 2001, 1947, 1954, years, 14, 1997, between 12 to 13 years, 21st February, 48, 2003, 2009, 3 years, 2006, daily, more than 3 months, several years, April 18, 2000, May 26, 1999, April 18, 2000, 3 years, 3 years, more than six months, six months, 3 years, April 18, 2000, May 26, May 26, 1999, 24 2013

ORG: ANANT PRASAD & ORS, UOI & ORS, Respondents Represented, JUSTICE, Home Guards, the Home Guards, etc.2, The Delhi Home Guards, the Bombay Home Guards Act, the Union Territory of Delhi, the Bombay Home Guards Act, the Union Territory of Delhi:2, Home Guards, Commandant General, the Union Territory of Delhi, the Home Guards, the Union Territory of Delhi, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Union Territory of Delhi, Commandant, the Commandant General, Commandant, the Commandant General, Commandant, Home Guards, the Home Guards, Commandant, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Union Territory of Delhi.5, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, Home Guards, the Home Guards, Delhi Home Guard Rules, the Delhi Home Guard Rules, Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Commandant General, Commandant, the Commandant General, Commandant, Home Guards, Home Guards, the Commandant General, Commandant, Home, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Commandant General, National Capital Territory, the Delhi Home Guards Organization, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Mansukh Lal Rawat & Ors v Union of India & Ors, the Division Bench, Petitioners, the Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, Home Guards, The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, the Home Guards, The Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, Central Government Servants, Home Guards, the Home Guards, Government, Group, the Home Guards, Bombay Home Guards Act, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, The Delhi Home Guards Rules, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, Compendium of Instructions, the Home Guards, Home Guards, Home Guards, the Home Guards, Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, Home Guards, Traffic Policeman, the Delhi Police, the Delhi Police, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, Tribunal, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition (Civil, the Supreme Court, the Home Guards, the Supreme Court, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Home Guards, the Supreme Court, the Home Guards, Petitioners, the Home Guards, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Respondents, Respondents, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Home Guards, Government, the Home Guards, Group, Group, Home Guards, Respondents, Tribunal, the Home Guards, Respondents, Respondents, the Government of National Capital Territory, Home Guards, the Honble High Court, Mansukh Lal Rawal & Ors, Union of India Ors, the Directorate of Home Guards, DISCHARGED HOME GUARD VOLUNTEERS, the Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guard Rules, Home Guards, Home Guards, the Directorate of Home Guards Delhi, the Honble High Court, Home Guard Volunteers, Home Guard Volunteer, Those Home Guard Volunteers, the Directorate of Home Guards, Home Guard Volunteers, Home Guard Volunteers, the Directorate of Home Guards, Home Guards, Those Home Guard Volunteers, the Delhi Home Guard Rules, Home Guard Volunteers, the Directorate of Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Central Government, the Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, the Bombay Home Guards Act, Court, Civil Writ Petition No.4286/1997.13, DSO, this Honble Court, Petitioners, Home Guards, this Honble Court, Honble Court, this Honble Court, this Honble Court, Home Guards, Home Guards Organization, 26.5.99 &/or, this Honble Court, this Honble Court, Petitioners, this Honble Court, Court, Home Guard, Home Guards, F.1/198/98/Home, Delhi Police, DESU, Court, the Bombay Home Guards Act, Bombay Home Guards Act, the Union Territory of Delhi, Delhi Home Guards Rules, Court, Mansukh Lals, Court, the Home Guards, Bombay Home Guards Act, Civil Writ Petition No.2001, Ajay Kumar & Ors v. Govt, the Bombay Home Guard Act, State, Delhi Home Guard Rules, Home Guards, Departments, State, State, the Home Guards, the Central Government Fund, State, the Home Guards, Commandant, Force, Tribunal, Court, inter alia, Court, the Home Guards, Court, the Supreme Court of India, the Home Guards, Departments including Police, Railways, Division Bench, Court, Delhi & Anr, State, Constitution.43, State, Court, Tribunal, the Union of India, the Department of Personnel & Training, Home Guards, the Supreme Court, India & Ors v Parul Debnath & Ors, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, the Home Guards, Court, Ajay Kumars, the Delhi Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guard Rules, the Supreme Court, State of Karnataka & Ors v Umadevi, Court, the Home Guards, Pantha Chatterjees, Border Security Force, the Border Wing Home Guards, the Border Wing Home Guards, Border Security Wing Home Guards, the Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Union of India, the Home Guards, the Border Security Force, Border Wing Security Home Guards, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Border Wing Home, the Supreme Court, Pantha Chatterjees, the Delhi Home Guards, Parul Debnaths, Nicobar Islands Home Guard Organization, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Home Guards, Home Guards, Nicobar Administration, Tribunal, Nicobar, The Supreme Court, Pantha Chatterjees, Andaman, Nicobar, Parul Debnaths, the Supreme Court, Parul Debnaths, Court, Court, the Delhi Home Guards, Court, the Delhi Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, the Delhi Home Guards, Delhi Home Guard, the Directorate of Home Guards, Home Guard, Court, the Home Guards Organization, Court, the Home Guards

PERSON: Petitioners Represented, Rishi Kesh, Rajiv Dewan, V.K.Tandon, Gazette, Emphasis Supplied, cases.4, Emphasis Supplied, Principal Bench, Emphasis Supplied, Petitioners, Rameshwar Dass Sharma & Others, Petitioners, Rule 8, Emphasis Supplied, CWP 4286/87, Delhi, therein that:-, Honble Apex, Bhushan Rai v Govt, emergency.6, Lal Rawal v Union, Sabharwal, Articles 14, Pantha Chatterjee, Mansukh Lal Rawat, Chander Bhushan Rai, Border Wing Home Guards, Border Wing Home Guards, Border Wing Home Guards, Border Wing Home Guards, Border Wing Home Guards, Calcutta Bench, Uma Devis, Mansukh Lal Rawats, JANUARY

NORP: J.1, Petitioners, Rules, Mandamus, Rules, Rules

GPE: India, Bombay, India, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Act.3, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, New Delhi, the United Kingdom, India, Bombay, India, Delhi, States, Centre, Centre, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, CWP Nos.3600, India, West Bengal, Uma Devis

CARDINAL: 1, two, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1959:3, 8, 4, 77, 77, 77, 1999.5, 1.15, 9, 1.23, 14, 2.1, 16, 3, 8), 7, 51, two, 8, 3, 3, 15, 2, 3, 10.12.99, 1, more than 4,000, one, one, 12, 85, 3, 1, several hundred, 26.5.1999, several hundred, several hundred, 20, 18.4.2000, 8,000-10,000/-, 2, 6, NCT, three, 3, 20, 26.05.1999, 26, 41, 2002.42, 16, 16, two, 50, 6, 7, 19, 3, 8, 1959.20, 4, 1, 3, one, 26, 1, one, 1999.29, 13

LOC: the District Magistrate.6, thereunder.30, Single

ORDINAL: fourth, first, fourth, first, second, fifth, sixth, First, first, first, second, first, first, first

MONEY: A. xxxx xxxx

WORK_OF_ART: Home Guards - Compendium of Instructions, 1993

PRODUCT: Para 1.1, Para 1.10, Rule 8 of the Rules, Para 1.23, Honble, Andaman, Andaman, Andaman

EVENT: World War-II

TIME: hour

FAC: Port Blair, Mansukh Lal Rawat

PERCENT: 20%, 80%