Semantic Analysis by spaCy
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar and ors.
Decided On : Nov-29-2012
Court : Delhi
LAW: APP.258/2010 1, Section 173 Cr, LIABILITY 5, Order XII Rule 8, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96(2)(b)(ii, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96
DATE: November, 2012 + MAC.APP, 24 days, 90 days, 24 days, 90 days, 1988, four years, four years, 1996, 2004, NOVEMBER 29 2012
CARDINAL: 244/2010, 36,900, 407, 407, two, 11.03.2005, 11.03.2005, 5, three, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 3, 25,000/-
ORG: NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, Adv, Adv, ANIL KUMAR & ORS, Adv, 258/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, Adv, Adv, KUMAR & ORS, Adv, JUSTICE, MAC, MAC, Appeals, The Appellant National Insurance Company Limited, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the First Respondents, the Appellant Insurance Company:(i, The Appellant Insurance Company, The First Respondents, Appeals, Tata, Sector 4 & 5 Dwarka, Tata, the Claims Tribunal, Counsel for the Appellant Insurance Company, CPC, the Appellant Insurance Company, Trial Court, the Appellant Insurance Company, the Claims Tribunal, Appellant, Transport Authority, the Supreme Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Insurance Company, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, Court, Act.10, National Insurance Company Limited, Swaran Singh & Ors, the Appellant Insurance Company
PERSON: Vivek Singh, Neelam Singh, Dharmesh Kumar Proxy Counsel, Sushil Kumar, Vivek Singh, Neelam Singh, Dharmesh Kumar Proxy Counsel, Sushil Kumar, JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, Sohan Lal Passi, P. Sesh Reddy, Bench, Gurbachan Singh
GPE: Rajapuri, P.C., policy.12
PRODUCT: Respondent No.2
FAC: Police Station Dwarka, Rajinder Pal Singh
WORK_OF_ART: the Second Respondent, The Second Respondent
TIME: 30.04.2009 i.e.