Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar and ors.

Decided On : Nov-29-2012

Court : Delhi

LAW: APP.258/2010 1, Section 173 Cr, LIABILITY 5, Order XII Rule 8, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96(2)(b)(ii, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96

DATE: November, 2012 + MAC.APP, 24 days, 90 days, 24 days, 90 days, 1988, four years, four years, 1996, 2004, NOVEMBER 29 2012

CARDINAL: 244/2010, 36,900, 407, 407, two, 11.03.2005, 11.03.2005, 5, three, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 3, 25,000/-

ORG: NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, Adv, Adv, ANIL KUMAR & ORS, Adv, 258/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, Adv, Adv, KUMAR & ORS, Adv, JUSTICE, MAC, MAC, Appeals, The Appellant National Insurance Company Limited, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the First Respondents, the Appellant Insurance Company:(i, The Appellant Insurance Company, The First Respondents, Appeals, Tata, Sector 4 & 5 Dwarka, Tata, the Claims Tribunal, Counsel for the Appellant Insurance Company, CPC, the Appellant Insurance Company, Trial Court, the Appellant Insurance Company, the Claims Tribunal, Appellant, Transport Authority, the Supreme Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Insurance Company, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, Court, Act.10, National Insurance Company Limited, Swaran Singh & Ors, the Appellant Insurance Company

PERSON: Vivek Singh, Neelam Singh, Dharmesh Kumar Proxy Counsel, Sushil Kumar, Vivek Singh, Neelam Singh, Dharmesh Kumar Proxy Counsel, Sushil Kumar, JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, Sohan Lal Passi, P. Sesh Reddy, Bench, Gurbachan Singh

GPE: Rajapuri, P.C., policy.12

PRODUCT: Respondent No.2

FAC: Police Station Dwarka, Rajinder Pal Singh

WORK_OF_ART: the Second Respondent, The Second Respondent

TIME: 30.04.2009 i.e.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //