Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ashok Kumar JaIn Vs. Sumati Jain

Decided On : Apr-15-2013

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 13, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13 of the Act, the Section 15 of the Act, Section 13, Section 23, Section 23

PERSON: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. Leave, Jaipur, Jaipur

CARDINAL: 2., 332, 3., two, 4., 5, four, four, 6., 8., 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 1, 1, 14, 15

DATE: 9th March, 2007, 1998, 13th February, 1998, 1955, 30th October, 1990, the first few days, a few days, 30th March, 1991, 5th December, 1991, 8th April, 1990, daily, Rs.50,000/-, 30th March, 1991, 13th February, 1998, about sixteen years

ORG: the Rajasthan High Court, Family Court, Family Court, Hospital, Family Court, the Family Court, Jain, the Family Court, The Appellate Court, The Appellate Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, The High Court, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, the Court of Law, Family Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court

GPE: Jaipur, Jaipur, Jaipur

MONEY: as &#, 8216;Shanta&#8217, 8220;Rajasthan, one &#, one &#, 8220;is

NORP: Hindu

TIME: first night

ORDINAL: first, first, third, first, first, third, second, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //