Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

R.B. Shah Vs. State of Gujarat

Decided On : May-11-2012

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PRODUCT: CAV JUDGMENT 1, 30/6/2011

ORG: Government Servant, Superintending Engineer, the Honourable Court, the Honourable Court, Superintending Engineer, the Honourable Court, case.&#8221, the State Government as Junior Engineer, Executive Engineer, Executive Engineer, Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineers, Government, Superintending Engineer, Government, Government, Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, Ahmedabad Irrigation Project Circle, Nadiad, High Court, Superintending Engineer, the State Government, Letters Patent Appeal, Appeal, Superintending Engineer, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Departmental Inquiry, Government, Executive Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineer, The Joint Departmental Promotion Committee, the Government Resolution, General Administration Department, Independent Authority, the RandB Department, Narmada Water Resource and Water Supply Department, Government Resolution, General Administration Department, General Administration Department, Letters Patent Appeal, The Letters Patent Appeal, Union of India Vs, AIR 1991, the Supreme Court, this Hon'ble Court, the State Government, Hon'ble Court, the State Government, the Hon'ble Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Departmental Promotion Committee, this Hon'ble Court, Superintending Engineer, this Hon'ble Court, Hon'ble Court, the State Government, the State Government, Superintending Engineer, the Hon'ble Court, the Government of Gujarat, Narmada Water Resources Water Supply, Kalpasar Department, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, Superintending Engineer, the Departmental Promotion Committee, the Government Servant, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Superintending Engineer, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Government, Government, Committee, Government, Government, Government, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Committee, Government, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Committee, Government, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Government, Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineer

MONEY: 8220;7, 8220;6, 8220;3, 8220;In, 8211

CARDINAL: 1, 29.9.2001, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 11/7/1994, 29/9/2001, 3, 4, 554, 12.09.2001, 8., 97, 9, 23.09.1981, 10, 31.05.2002, Khtp-1587-43, 12, 5, 4., 5., 6, 6, 7, 5, 5, 5, 5, two, more than 20, 5

DATE: 26/7/1965, 22/10/1996, 11/7/1994, 25/6/1999, 31/3/2001, the very same date, 29/9/2001, 12/9/2001, the years 1978-1980, 1983, almost 22 years, 16/10/2001, the year 1996, 12/9/2001, 29/9/2010, 8/11/2001, 22 years, 29/9/2001, more than 2 decades, 11.07.2001, 23.09.1981, December, 29/09/2001, 08.11.2001, 2 weeks, two years, 12.09.2003, 2002, 2002, 12.09.2001, the period of two years, 23.09.2004, 23.09.1981, 11.10.2006, 2006, 11.10.2006, 16.3.2007, 4.8.2007, 4.8.2007, 12.9.2001, 11/3/2002, 16/10/2002, 24/10/2002, monthly, 2 years, more than two decades, 23/9/1981, 12/9/2001, 29/9/2001, 12th September 2001, 23rd September 1981, monthly, a period of, two years, the year 2004, the year 2002, two decades, the period of two decades, the year 1996, 12th September 2001, 29th September 2001, a period of two years, 23rd September 1981, 29th September 2001, 29th September 2001, 29th September 2001, a period of, two months, today

WORK_OF_ART: 8/11/2001

LOC: Single Judge, Single

PERSON: Paresh Upadhyay, Upadhyay, Upadhyay, Upadhyay, Upadhyay, Pathak, no.580, Memo No, Government Memo, K.V.Jankiraman

TIME: the last minute, 8.11.2001, the last minute, the last minute

GPE: reply.&#8221, G.R.

EVENT: SC 2010

FAC: Resolution

ORDINAL: second

PERCENT: 9%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //