Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Avtar Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Decided On : Nov-11-2011

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the Constitution Bench, a Constitution Bench, the Full Bench, Article 14, the Full Bench of the Punjab, Constitution Bench, Article 14, Constitution, Article 226, Constitution, Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Constitutional Bench, Article 14, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 14, Article 39(d, the Official Liquidators, Article 39, Article 39(d, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 309 of the Constitution

PERSON: Hemant Gupta, J. CWP No.14796, Rajinder Singh, Avtar, Lakhwinder Singh, Uma Devi, Charanjeet Singh, Haryana, Uma Devi, Charanjeet Singh, Haryana, 8220;Neelam Rani Vs, Haryana, Randhir Singh Vs, P. Savita Vs, Surinder Singh VS, V. Markendeya Vs, J.P.Chaurasia, Grih Kalyan Kendra, Haryana, Jasmer Singh, Harbans Lal, Mewa Ram Kanojia Vs, Vijay Sharma Vs, Singh, Singh Vs, Kulbir Singh Vs, Shyamol K. Chatterjee, Ved Pal, Jagannath Maruti Kondhare AIR 1996, Pantnagar, Panchayat Bhikhiwind Vs, Kulbir Singh, Delhi Municipal Karamchari, Benches, Tilak Raj, Charanjit Singh, Full Bench, Tilak Raj, Charanjit Singh, Singh, Benches Judgments, Maruti Kondhare, Bench, Bhagwan Dass, Tilak, Haryana Vs, Jasmer Singh, J.P.Chaurasia, Balaram Sahu, Benches, Bench, Devinder Singh, xxx xxx xxx, Jasmer Singh, Tilak Raj, Tarun K. Roy, Larger Bench, petitions.&#8221, Bench, Haryana, Vijay Sharma, Singh, Haryana, Charanjit Singh, 8220;36, Benches, Gurcharan Singh Kahlon, Benches, Haryana, Charanjit Singh, Vijay Sharma, Mohd, Khursheed Anwar 2010, Articles 14, Articles 14, Uma Devi, xxx xxx xxx, Bench, B.N.Nanjudappa Vs, xxx xxx xxx, Mahendra L. Jain, Manoj K. Mohanty, Jasmer Singh, Harbans Lal, Surinder Singh, Dharwad District, Haryana, Piara Singh, xxx xxx xxx, Dibyendu Bhattacharya, Bench, Anr, B. Renjith, Kumar’s, Malis, Mali, Surinder Kumar, Surjit Singh, Charanjit Singh, Putti Lal, Bench, Bench

DATE: 2003, daily, 2010, 22092, 2010, 2003, 2003, daily, 2003, 07.01.2009, 1988, 05.02.2003, the last three years, 1992, 1997, 21.07.1997, 2009, 30.08.2010, 1999, 20.11.2002, three years, 07.11.1996, more than six years, a month of 31 days, 18.03.1998, 1998, 15.07.1998, daily, 2003, 2009, 2009, daily, daily, 2008, 10.01.2008, 2002, 2002, 1998, 2006, 2006, 2006, JT 2005, 1998, 1998, 1991, 28.04.1992, 1995, 23.11.1995, 1986, 1996, 1995, 1989, 1989, 1988, 1995, November 8, 1995, daily, daily, a particular day, a particular day, a day, a particular day, 1995, 13.12.2001, 2002, 1999, 1997, 1995, 18.03.1998, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1999, daily, years, 43, ten years, 1999, 20.11.2002, 2009, 30.08.2010, 2003, 1992, 2006, 27.09.2006, 1999, 20.12.2001, 2009, 2008, 10.01.2008, 1997, 21.07.1997, 18.03.1998, 1995, 20.08.1998, the present day, daily, 1996, 1989, 1989, 1995, 2003, 1998, three years, 1998, 2002, 1998, 2006, 2007, 2006, 2006, 04.02.2009, 31.10.2008, 24.07.2009, daily, daily, daily, 44, daily, 48, daily, daily, daily, daily, 2006, more than ten years, 1985-1986, 2010, daily, ten years, daily, daily, 1967, 1972, 2005, daily, Articles 14 and 39(d, 2003, 2007, 1980s, early 1990s, 1986, 1986, 1988, 1990, daily, 16, 1959, sixteenth and seventeenth century, 1139, 36 years, Articles 14, 1959, 2010, 2008, daily, daily, daily, daily, between daily, daily, daily, daily, daily, 2006, daily, years, daily, 10 years, daily, daily, daily, so many years, daily, daily, all these years, daily, daily, daily, daily, 2009, 2003, daily, daily, daily, daily, daily, 10 years, daily, more than three years, two months, 10 years, daily, a period of, three years, two months

PRODUCT: Bench, Vs, Vs, Vs, Vs, Bench, Vs, Vs, Vs, 9 SCC 321, a Full Bench, Vs, Vs, Vs, Vs, The Full Bench, another Full Bench, Vs, 713, the Full Bench, Vijay, Vijay, 9 SCC 321, Vijay, Vijay, Vijay, the Full Bench, Vijay, Vijay, Vijay, Vs, Vijay, a Full Bench, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, Vijay, 9 SCC 321, 9 SCC 321, Constitutional Bench, Articles 14, Vs, Vs, Vs, Vs, 897, Vijay, Vijay, Chowkidar, Vs

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single, Rajinder Kumar’s, Single, Single, S.V.Narayanappa Vs

ORG: Court, the State Government, Division Benches, Court, Court, LPA, State, Supreme Court, State, Civil Appeal No.4492, LPA, CWP No.14050, Bench, LPA, Rajinder, Division Benches, Court, Rs.3731/-, Pump Operators, Rs.3420/- plus Dearness Allowances, CWP No.7533 of 1995, State, Special Leave Petition, Department, Court, LPA, LPA No, the Employment Exchange, Schedule of Rates, the Petitioner as Annexure P-1, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, State of Punjab, the High Court, the Civil Appeal, the High Court, Court, Civil Appeal No.7995, Court, Supreme Court, State, State of Haryana, Court, State of Punjab, High Court of Punjab, Court, State, Karnataka and Ors, State, the High Court, the Government of Punjab, the High Court, Court, the Government of Punjab, the High Court, Court, CWP No.11290, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Ranbir Singh Vs, Court, the Division Benches, Union of India AIR 1982, Union of India AIR 1985, Dhirendra Chamoli Vs, U.P. 1986, AIR, Bhagwan Das Vs, Haryana AIR 1987, Jaipal Vs, Haryana AIR 1988, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1989, AIR 1989, Union of India AIR 1991, State, Ghaziabad Development Authority, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Federation of All India Customs, Vs., Union of India, Court, Ghaziabad Development, the apex Court, the Division Bench, CWP No.9192, State of Punjab, State of Punjab Vs, Singh (Civil Appeal No.4867, Bhagwati Parshad Vs, Delhi State Mineral Corporation AIR 1990, Food Corporation of India Vs, AIR 2000 SC3554, ChandigarhAdmn, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6285 of, Sandeep Kumar Vs, Uttar Pradesh AIR 1992, SC, G.B.Pant University of Agricultural and Technology, Nainital Vs, Uttar Pradesh AIR 2000, Daily Rated Casual Labour, Bhartiya Dak Tar Mazdoor Manch Vs., Union of India AIR 1997, U.P.Income Tax Department Contingent Paid Staff Welfare Association Vs., Union of India, AIR 1988, AIR 1988, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, relief.&#8221, CWP No.14050, Court, Court, Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, State, Court, State, CWP No.6780, the Division Bench, State of Punjab, Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, The Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Larger Bench, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, CWP No.10017 of, Court, State, Apex Court, State, Bhagwati Prasad, Delhi State Mineral Corporation AIR 1990, SC, State, State, agannath, State, State of Uttar Pradesh, Dhirendra Chamoli, State, Bench, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, State, State, U.P. Vs, Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs, State, the High Court, the principle of &#, the High Court, State, Larger Bench, Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, The Hon’ble Supreme Court, inter alia, Court, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Selection in Committee, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Division, Court, Court, Haryana High Court, State of, State of Punjab, State of Punjab, State, The High Court, Bench, Court, Court, State, Court, State, Umadevi, the High Court, the State of Punjab, the High Court, Court, Court, State, State, Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, U.P. Land Development Corporation Vs, Bench, Court, the High Court, the Commercial Taxes Department, the High Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, State, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, State, the Commercial Taxes Department, the Commercial Taxes Department, the Administrative Tribunal, The High Court, Court, Umadevi, Commercial Taxes Department, Court, the Bihar Intermediate Education Council, Court, Court, T. Thimmiah, Umadevi’s.&#8221, Indore Development Authority, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the State Government, the Labour Court, See Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology Vs, Court, Court, Canteen Mazdoor Sabha Vs, Metallurgical, Engineering Consultants, the Official Liquidators, U.P., CPWD, Daily Rated Casual Labour v. Union of India, Literate Daily Wage Employees', Bhagwati Prasad, Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation, State, Court, State, the Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies, Court, the High Courts, Administrative Tribunals. &, the High Courts, the High Courts, the High Courts, Kishori Mohanlal, Bakshi v. Union of India, AIR 1962, Randhir, Official Liquidators, Court, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Official Liquidators, Government, the Consolidate Fund of India, the Government of India, Steel Authority of India Ltd., Court, Court, State, Comparison, Ors, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, Khursheed, U.P. Land Development Corporation, Khursheed, LPA, Court, State, Chowkidars, Pump Operators, Tilak, State, AIR 1997 SC 2129, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Expert Committee, the Expert Committee, Court, a Selection Committee, State, U.P., The High Court, Supreme Court, Court, Court, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttaranchal, the Expert Committee, the Head of the Department, Division Bench, LPA, Division Bench, LPA, the State Government

CARDINAL: two, One, 4, 118, 22, two, 11.05.2011, 910, 08.07.2004, 4, 4, 12, 475, 4, 11, 1, 637, 19, 10, 876, 5, 219, 4, 459, 2, 235, 3, 91, one, 6, 1, five, 1, 344, 13.12.2000, 17.10.2000, 10.01.2002, 1, 13.03.2002, 05.10.2005, 04.08.2009, 9, 514, Two, Three, 165, 252, Two, 134.&#8221, two, 11, 1, 121, 4, 5, 210, 1, 250, 12, 13, 23.08.2004, three, 9, 595, 19, 20, one, 21, two, 2, 189, 1, 931, 9, 37, 15, 525, 4, 53, 43, 38, 39, 2009-, 22.09.2008, 09.07.2009, 3, 327, 8220;55, 48, 32, 16, 16, 16, 4, 30, 55, 4, 179, two, 53, 53, 8, 55, 53, 8, 9, 53, 1, 128, 1, 15, 15, 8, 55, 53, 1, two, 5, three, 7, 1, 637, 1, 639, 1, 122, 2, 396, 68, Thousands, 69, 93, 94, 16, 100, three, two, 17, 5, 12, two, 9, three, pay.&#8221, 1, 2, 3

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, P-1, 8220;These, P-1, Randhir, Punjab, P-1, Harbans, Devinder

GPE: Piara, Singh, Rajinder, Karnataka, Ticket, Sandeep, H.P., Ranbir, Karnataka, Uma Devi’s, Uma Devi’s, Government, Uma Devi’s, Surjit, Karnataka, Satya, Bihar, Uma Devi’s, Uma Devi’s, Uma Devi’s, Balaram, Karnataka, the United Stats of America, Singh v. Union of India, India, India, Kerala, Mohd, Mohd, Rajinder, Balaram, Uma Devi’s

TIME: 07.01.2009 i.e.

MONEY: 8220;Leave, 8220;Rajkumar, 8220;a, 8220;42, 8220;15, 8220;24, 8220;22, 8220;12, 8230;, 8220;44, 8230, 8220;27, 8220;7, 8220;43, 8220;66, 8230;&#8230, 8220;6

EVENT: SC 584, SC 2049, SC 2898, SC 2342, SC 517

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench: &, proceedings.&#8221, Rajinder Kumar’s Case

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //