Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co. Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co.

Decided On : Jun-03-1929

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context

$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 2 => 'The Providence Mill Company
 



 No',
			(int) 3 => 'Syllabus',
			(int) 4 => 'Court',
			(int) 5 => 'State',
			(int) 6 => 'the Superintendent of Public Works',
			(int) 7 => 'the Miami & Erie Canal',
			(int) 8 => 'Minor',
			(int) 9 => 'Minor',
			(int) 10 => 'the Wabash & Erie Canal',
			(int) 11 => 'the Miami & Erie',
			(int) 12 => 'Ohio Laws',
			(int) 13 => 'the Ohio Legislature',
			(int) 14 => 'Ohio Laws'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '279',
			(int) 1 => '279',
			(int) 2 => '675',
			(int) 3 => '279',
			(int) 4 => 'three',
			(int) 5 => '266',
			(int) 6 => 'three',
			(int) 7 => '674',
			(int) 8 => '797',
			(int) 9 => 'one',
			(int) 10 => '38',
			(int) 11 => '87',
			(int) 12 => '674',
			(int) 13 => '674',
			(int) 14 => '112',
			(int) 15 => '360',
			(int) 16 => '674'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 3 => 'Ohio',
			(int) 4 => 'Ohio'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1929',
			(int) 1 => '1929',
			(int) 2 => 'April 26, 1929',
			(int) 3 => 'June 3, 1929',
			(int) 4 => 'September 1, 1842',
			(int) 5 => 'February 23, 1846',
			(int) 6 => 'March 23, 1840',
			(int) 7 => '1840',
			(int) 8 => 'May 11, 1927'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
			(int) 1 => 'Kirk',
			(int) 2 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co.',
			(int) 3 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.',
			(int) 4 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.'
		),
		'LOC' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'the Maumee River'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '95077',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '279 U.S. 807',
			'appellant' => 'Kirk',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1929-06-03',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co. - 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co., 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Kirk v. The Providence Mill Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 675
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 26, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided June 3, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 279 U.S. 807
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A grant of the right to use surplus water from a state canal
 <em>
 held
 </em>
 subject to the right of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, on the authority of
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., ante
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95076/kirk-vs-maumee-valley-elec-co">
 279 U. S. 797
 </a>
</span>
 . P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95077/kirk-vs-providence-mill-co#809">
 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Reversed.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="808">
 Page 279 U. S. 808
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 Appeal from a final decree of the district court of three judges enjoining the appellants from interfering with the flows of water in part of a canal in such manner as to infringe certain water rights claimed by the appellee.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 This is a direct appeal, under § 266 of the Judicial Code, from a final decree, following an interlocutory decree, of a district court of three judges for southern Ohio enjoining appellants, the State Director of Highways, the Superintendent of Public Works of Ohio, and county commissioners, from draining or otherwise interfering with the flow of water in a section of the Miami & Erie Canal in such manner as to interfere with the rights of appellee to take surplus water under a grant from the state to appellees' predecessor in interest. The questions presented are the same as those in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., ante,
 </em>
 p. 797, the only difference being in the nature of the grant under which appellee derives its rights to the water.
 </p>
<p>
 The grant here involved is embraced in an indenture of September 1, 1842, between the commissioner of the board of public works and one Minor, as readjusted on February 23, 1846. By it, Minor, a riparian owner, released and quitclaimed to the state all claims against it arising out of the use and occupation by the state of water from the Maumee River and of lands used in the construction and operation of the Wabash & Erie Canal,
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="809">
 Page 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 now the Miami & Erie. This release was made in consideration of a perpetual grant by the state, made after the passage of the Act of March 23, 1840, 38 Ohio Laws, p. 87, discussed at length in our opinion in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., supra.
 </em>
 By the grant, the state sold and conveyed a specified quantity of water "except when otherwise necessary for the navigation of the canal," and the contract, as readjusted, was similarly restricted. The grant was subject to the limitations of the statute of 1840, and the rights conferred under it did not, for present purposes, differ from those considered in No. 674. They were likewise subject to the reserved power of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, which was exercised by the Act of the Ohio Legislature of May 11, 1927, 112 Ohio Laws, p. 360. For the reasons discussed at length in No. 674, and equally applicable here, the judgment below is
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Providence Mill Co.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/279/807/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '95077'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 2 => 'The Providence Mill Company
 



 No',
		(int) 3 => 'Syllabus',
		(int) 4 => 'Court',
		(int) 5 => 'State',
		(int) 6 => 'the Superintendent of Public Works',
		(int) 7 => 'the Miami & Erie Canal',
		(int) 8 => 'Minor',
		(int) 9 => 'Minor',
		(int) 10 => 'the Wabash & Erie Canal',
		(int) 11 => 'the Miami & Erie',
		(int) 12 => 'Ohio Laws',
		(int) 13 => 'the Ohio Legislature',
		(int) 14 => 'Ohio Laws'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '279',
		(int) 1 => '279',
		(int) 2 => '675',
		(int) 3 => '279',
		(int) 4 => 'three',
		(int) 5 => '266',
		(int) 6 => 'three',
		(int) 7 => '674',
		(int) 8 => '797',
		(int) 9 => 'one',
		(int) 10 => '38',
		(int) 11 => '87',
		(int) 12 => '674',
		(int) 13 => '674',
		(int) 14 => '112',
		(int) 15 => '360',
		(int) 16 => '674'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 3 => 'Ohio',
		(int) 4 => 'Ohio'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1929',
		(int) 1 => '1929',
		(int) 2 => 'April 26, 1929',
		(int) 3 => 'June 3, 1929',
		(int) 4 => 'September 1, 1842',
		(int) 5 => 'February 23, 1846',
		(int) 6 => 'March 23, 1840',
		(int) 7 => '1840',
		(int) 8 => 'May 11, 1927'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
		(int) 1 => 'Kirk',
		(int) 2 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co.',
		(int) 3 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.',
		(int) 4 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.'
	),
	'LOC' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'the Maumee River'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '95077',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '279 U.S. 807',
		'appellant' => 'Kirk',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1929-06-03',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co. - 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co., 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Kirk v. The Providence Mill Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 675
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 26, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided June 3, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 279 U.S. 807
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A grant of the right to use surplus water from a state canal
 <em>
 held
 </em>
 subject to the right of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, on the authority of
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., ante
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95076/kirk-vs-maumee-valley-elec-co">
 279 U. S. 797
 </a>
</span>
 . P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95077/kirk-vs-providence-mill-co#809">
 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Reversed.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="808">
 Page 279 U. S. 808
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 Appeal from a final decree of the district court of three judges enjoining the appellants from interfering with the flows of water in part of a canal in such manner as to infringe certain water rights claimed by the appellee.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 This is a direct appeal, under § 266 of the Judicial Code, from a final decree, following an interlocutory decree, of a district court of three judges for southern Ohio enjoining appellants, the State Director of Highways, the Superintendent of Public Works of Ohio, and county commissioners, from draining or otherwise interfering with the flow of water in a section of the Miami & Erie Canal in such manner as to interfere with the rights of appellee to take surplus water under a grant from the state to appellees' predecessor in interest. The questions presented are the same as those in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., ante,
 </em>
 p. 797, the only difference being in the nature of the grant under which appellee derives its rights to the water.
 </p>
<p>
 The grant here involved is embraced in an indenture of September 1, 1842, between the commissioner of the board of public works and one Minor, as readjusted on February 23, 1846. By it, Minor, a riparian owner, released and quitclaimed to the state all claims against it arising out of the use and occupation by the state of water from the Maumee River and of lands used in the construction and operation of the Wabash & Erie Canal,
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="809">
 Page 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 now the Miami & Erie. This release was made in consideration of a perpetual grant by the state, made after the passage of the Act of March 23, 1840, 38 Ohio Laws, p. 87, discussed at length in our opinion in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., supra.
 </em>
 By the grant, the state sold and conveyed a specified quantity of water "except when otherwise necessary for the navigation of the canal," and the contract, as readjusted, was similarly restricted. The grant was subject to the limitations of the statute of 1840, and the rights conferred under it did not, for present purposes, differ from those considered in No. 674. They were likewise subject to the reserved power of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, which was exercised by the Act of the Ohio Legislature of May 11, 1927, 112 Ohio Laws, p. 360. For the reasons discussed at length in No. 674, and equally applicable here, the judgment below is
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Providence Mill Co.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/279/807/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '95077'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 2 => 'The Providence Mill Company
 



 No',
			(int) 3 => 'Syllabus',
			(int) 4 => 'Court',
			(int) 5 => 'State',
			(int) 6 => 'the Superintendent of Public Works',
			(int) 7 => 'the Miami & Erie Canal',
			(int) 8 => 'Minor',
			(int) 9 => 'Minor',
			(int) 10 => 'the Wabash & Erie Canal',
			(int) 11 => 'the Miami & Erie',
			(int) 12 => 'Ohio Laws',
			(int) 13 => 'the Ohio Legislature',
			(int) 14 => 'Ohio Laws'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '279',
			(int) 1 => '279',
			(int) 2 => '675',
			(int) 3 => '279',
			(int) 4 => 'three',
			(int) 5 => '266',
			(int) 6 => 'three',
			(int) 7 => '674',
			(int) 8 => '797',
			(int) 9 => 'one',
			(int) 10 => '38',
			(int) 11 => '87',
			(int) 12 => '674',
			(int) 13 => '674',
			(int) 14 => '112',
			(int) 15 => '360',
			(int) 16 => '674'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 3 => 'Ohio',
			(int) 4 => 'Ohio'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1929',
			(int) 1 => '1929',
			(int) 2 => 'April 26, 1929',
			(int) 3 => 'June 3, 1929',
			(int) 4 => 'September 1, 1842',
			(int) 5 => 'February 23, 1846',
			(int) 6 => 'March 23, 1840',
			(int) 7 => '1840',
			(int) 8 => 'May 11, 1927'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
			(int) 1 => 'Kirk',
			(int) 2 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co.',
			(int) 3 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.',
			(int) 4 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.'
		),
		'LOC' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'the Maumee River'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '95077',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '279 U.S. 807',
			'appellant' => 'Kirk',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1929-06-03',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co. - 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co., 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Kirk v. The Providence Mill Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 675
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 26, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided June 3, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 279 U.S. 807
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A grant of the right to use surplus water from a state canal
 <em>
 held
 </em>
 subject to the right of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, on the authority of
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., ante
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95076/kirk-vs-maumee-valley-elec-co">
 279 U. S. 797
 </a>
</span>
 . P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95077/kirk-vs-providence-mill-co#809">
 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Reversed.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="808">
 Page 279 U. S. 808
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 Appeal from a final decree of the district court of three judges enjoining the appellants from interfering with the flows of water in part of a canal in such manner as to infringe certain water rights claimed by the appellee.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 This is a direct appeal, under § 266 of the Judicial Code, from a final decree, following an interlocutory decree, of a district court of three judges for southern Ohio enjoining appellants, the State Director of Highways, the Superintendent of Public Works of Ohio, and county commissioners, from draining or otherwise interfering with the flow of water in a section of the Miami & Erie Canal in such manner as to interfere with the rights of appellee to take surplus water under a grant from the state to appellees' predecessor in interest. The questions presented are the same as those in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., ante,
 </em>
 p. 797, the only difference being in the nature of the grant under which appellee derives its rights to the water.
 </p>
<p>
 The grant here involved is embraced in an indenture of September 1, 1842, between the commissioner of the board of public works and one Minor, as readjusted on February 23, 1846. By it, Minor, a riparian owner, released and quitclaimed to the state all claims against it arising out of the use and occupation by the state of water from the Maumee River and of lands used in the construction and operation of the Wabash & Erie Canal,
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="809">
 Page 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 now the Miami & Erie. This release was made in consideration of a perpetual grant by the state, made after the passage of the Act of March 23, 1840, 38 Ohio Laws, p. 87, discussed at length in our opinion in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., supra.
 </em>
 By the grant, the state sold and conveyed a specified quantity of water "except when otherwise necessary for the navigation of the canal," and the contract, as readjusted, was similarly restricted. The grant was subject to the limitations of the statute of 1840, and the rights conferred under it did not, for present purposes, differ from those considered in No. 674. They were likewise subject to the reserved power of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, which was exercised by the Act of the Ohio Legislature of May 11, 1927, 112 Ohio Laws, p. 360. For the reasons discussed at length in No. 674, and equally applicable here, the judgment below is
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Providence Mill Co.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/279/807/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '95077'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 2 => 'The Providence Mill Company
 



 No',
		(int) 3 => 'Syllabus',
		(int) 4 => 'Court',
		(int) 5 => 'State',
		(int) 6 => 'the Superintendent of Public Works',
		(int) 7 => 'the Miami & Erie Canal',
		(int) 8 => 'Minor',
		(int) 9 => 'Minor',
		(int) 10 => 'the Wabash & Erie Canal',
		(int) 11 => 'the Miami & Erie',
		(int) 12 => 'Ohio Laws',
		(int) 13 => 'the Ohio Legislature',
		(int) 14 => 'Ohio Laws'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '279',
		(int) 1 => '279',
		(int) 2 => '675',
		(int) 3 => '279',
		(int) 4 => 'three',
		(int) 5 => '266',
		(int) 6 => 'three',
		(int) 7 => '674',
		(int) 8 => '797',
		(int) 9 => 'one',
		(int) 10 => '38',
		(int) 11 => '87',
		(int) 12 => '674',
		(int) 13 => '674',
		(int) 14 => '112',
		(int) 15 => '360',
		(int) 16 => '674'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 3 => 'Ohio',
		(int) 4 => 'Ohio'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1929',
		(int) 1 => '1929',
		(int) 2 => 'April 26, 1929',
		(int) 3 => 'June 3, 1929',
		(int) 4 => 'September 1, 1842',
		(int) 5 => 'February 23, 1846',
		(int) 6 => 'March 23, 1840',
		(int) 7 => '1840',
		(int) 8 => 'May 11, 1927'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.',
		(int) 1 => 'Kirk',
		(int) 2 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co.',
		(int) 3 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.',
		(int) 4 => 'Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.'
	),
	'LOC' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'the Maumee River'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '95077',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '279 U.S. 807',
		'appellant' => 'Kirk',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Kirk Vs. Providence Mill Co.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1929-06-03',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co. - 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Kirk v. Providence Mill Co., 279 U.S. 807 (1929)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Kirk v. The Providence Mill Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 675
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 26, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided June 3, 1929
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 279 U.S. 807
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A grant of the right to use surplus water from a state canal
 <em>
 held
 </em>
 subject to the right of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, on the authority of
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., ante
 </em>
 p.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95076/kirk-vs-maumee-valley-elec-co">
 279 U. S. 797
 </a>
</span>
 . P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/95077/kirk-vs-providence-mill-co#809">
 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 Reversed.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="808">
 Page 279 U. S. 808
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 Appeal from a final decree of the district court of three judges enjoining the appellants from interfering with the flows of water in part of a canal in such manner as to infringe certain water rights claimed by the appellee.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 This is a direct appeal, under § 266 of the Judicial Code, from a final decree, following an interlocutory decree, of a district court of three judges for southern Ohio enjoining appellants, the State Director of Highways, the Superintendent of Public Works of Ohio, and county commissioners, from draining or otherwise interfering with the flow of water in a section of the Miami & Erie Canal in such manner as to interfere with the rights of appellee to take surplus water under a grant from the state to appellees' predecessor in interest. The questions presented are the same as those in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., ante,
 </em>
 p. 797, the only difference being in the nature of the grant under which appellee derives its rights to the water.
 </p>
<p>
 The grant here involved is embraced in an indenture of September 1, 1842, between the commissioner of the board of public works and one Minor, as readjusted on February 23, 1846. By it, Minor, a riparian owner, released and quitclaimed to the state all claims against it arising out of the use and occupation by the state of water from the Maumee River and of lands used in the construction and operation of the Wabash & Erie Canal,
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="809">
 Page 279 U. S. 809
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 now the Miami & Erie. This release was made in consideration of a perpetual grant by the state, made after the passage of the Act of March 23, 1840, 38 Ohio Laws, p. 87, discussed at length in our opinion in No. 674,
 <em>
 Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., supra.
 </em>
 By the grant, the state sold and conveyed a specified quantity of water "except when otherwise necessary for the navigation of the canal," and the contract, as readjusted, was similarly restricted. The grant was subject to the limitations of the statute of 1840, and the rights conferred under it did not, for present purposes, differ from those considered in No. 674. They were likewise subject to the reserved power of the state to abandon the canal and devote it to other purposes, which was exercised by the Act of the Ohio Legislature of May 11, 1927, 112 Ohio Laws, p. 360. For the reasons discussed at length in No. 674, and equally applicable here, the judgment below is
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Providence Mill Co.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/279/807/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '95077'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

ORG: Kirk v. Providence Mill Co., U.S. Supreme Court, The Providence Mill Company No, Syllabus, Court, State, the Superintendent of Public Works, the Miami & Erie Canal, Minor, Minor, the Wabash & Erie Canal, the Miami & Erie, Ohio Laws, the Ohio Legislature, Ohio Laws

CARDINAL: 279, 279, 675, 279, three, 266, three, 674, 797, one, 38, 87, 674, 674, 112, 360, 674

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Ohio, Ohio

DATE: 1929, 1929, April 26, 1929, June 3, 1929, September 1, 1842, February 23, 1846, March 23, 1840, 1840, May 11, 1927

PERSON: Kirk v. Providence Mill Co., Kirk, Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co., Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.

LOC: the Maumee River