Prashant and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Chamorshi, District Gadchiroli

Decided On : Aug-14-2012

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

LAW: Section 498A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 306, the Indian Penal Code, Chapter XXA, Indian Penal Code, section 498A. Section 498A, the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Act 46 of 1983, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 498A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 113A, the Indian Penal Code, the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Evidence Act, Section 306, the Indian Penal Code, Section 107, Section 107, Section 107, Section 306, section 498A, section 34

CARDINAL: 1, 3 and 4, 2, 3, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 5000/, 3, 2, One, 3, 1130/1, 4, 5., nine, One, about 18.15, 6, One, One, One, one, about 8, One, One, 8., 9, 113A, 10, 11, 2, 12, 241, 13, 1, 681, 14, 33, 15, PWs1, 2, 16, 17, 18, One, 19

ORG: the Judgment and Order, Court, Original Accused, Chamorshi, Appellant no.3, Chamorshi, Police Station,, Chamorshi, Court, the Bank of India, Yenapur, Home, Solvency Certificate, Talathi, Chamorshi, Learned Advocate, Advocate, Nagpur, Chamorshi, Ms R.A.Deshpande, A.P.P., A.P.P., Court, the Spot Panchanama, the Inquest Panchanama, Shobhabai Gainewar, the Police Station, the Sumo Vehicle, Vehicle, Narayan Gainewar, Varsha Gainewar, Rekha and Rekha, Rekha’s Mother, Rekha’s house, Nagpur, Vachchalla (PW6, Neighbourers of Shobhabai (PW3, Rekha, Rekha, Sec, Presumption, Court, IPC, the Statement of Objects, the Joint Committee of the Houses, First &#, Instigates, Secondly &, Appellants, Bhimrao Bharne and Ors, State of Maharashtra, PW 6 Vimal, PW 4 Narayan, Court, Advocate, State of, the Bombay High Court, State of Chattisgarh, Chattisgarh High Court, Kailash Baburao Pandit, The State of Maharashtra, State, AIR 1994 SC 1418, the Apex Court, Court, Court, guilty.&#8221, Assoo, State of M.P., CRI, SC, the Apex Court, State, Nagpur, no.2, Rekha, The Criminal Appeal, Learned Counsel, Court, the Apex Court, A.P.P., the Apex Court

DATE: 15th July, 2008, 2004, one year, 10 days, five years, six months, two years, 1000/, 10 days, 13/05/2001, 8th February 2004, 20 and 21, the year 2003, 9/2/2004, the year 2003, five to six days, 2/3 months, 1860, three years, 1983, 45 of 1860, 46 of 1983, 1961, 2004, 23 days, the day, 2007, 2011, April 1982, June 1985, 2011, 2462, 34, 2012, Para 5, 2009, Cri) 3031, modern day's, two months, a period of, six weeks, today

ORDINAL: 2nd, first, Thirdly

GPE: Gadchiroli, Nagpur city, Shalutai, no.4, Nagpur, Nagpur, Varsha, Varsha, Varsha, Varsha, Varsha, Varsha, Varsha, Deepak, West Bengal, Janardhan, Mangala, Varsha

PERSON: Rekha, Rekha, Puttewar, Laxman, Shalutai, Rajani, Rekha, Chamorshi, I.S.Charlewar, Gat, Order, Kripashankar Shivnarayan Mishra, Milind Ramteke, Rekha, Rekha, Rekha, Rekha, Rekha, Rajani, Rekha, Rajani, Rajani, Rekha, Rajani, Rekha, Rajani, Rekha, Rekha, Rekha, Nagpur, Rekha, Malati Thakre, Malati, Rekha, Shobha, Shobhatai, Shobhatai, Rekha, Shobhatai, Rekha, Vachchala, Reasons, Criminal Law, Greedy Husband, I.S.Charlewar, L.J. 987, Sunita, Sunita, Sunita, Sunita, Ghatanji, Sunita, Ghatanji, Shri Charlewar, Dhanesh Sharma, Shri Charlewar, Anr, Orilal Jaiswal, L. J. 658, Asaram Pere, Rekha, Appellant no.3 Rajani, Rekha, Rekha, Rekha, Nagpur, Rekha, Order

TIME: that night, the same night, about 2 a.m., 2 a.m., the same night, the same night, the night, the night

MONEY: 8211, 8211;law, 8211;law, 8220;cruelty&#8221, 8220;14, 8220;33, 8220;34, 8220;We, 8220;16, 8220;an

PRODUCT: Charge, PW 5 Baby, Judgment, proper.&#8221, Judgment

QUANTITY: 3 a. m.

WORK_OF_ART: Naming, Vijay Narhar Pathak

NORP: Indian

FAC: Judgment