Dr. Rajendra S/O. Narayanrao Dhakne Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Oct-19-2012

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 482, Exhibit 1", Exhibit 1, Exhibit 8/C, Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 397 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 397(3, Section 397, Section 482, Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Exhibit 1

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3. Rule, 4., 17, 21/2012, 21/2012, 5., 23, 25, 29, 21/2012, 21/2012, 17, 17, 6, 21/2012, two, 8, 21/2012, 17, 9, 21/2012, 17, 21/2012, 10, 21/2012, 21/2012, 17, 7, 17, 11, 21/2012, 17, two, 12, 13, 2002(1, 14, 15, 17, 21/2012, 16, 17, 21/2012, 21/2012, 17, 18

PERSON: Heard Adv, R.G. Hange, B.J. Sonwane, Counsel, Counsel, Beed, Gauri Raghunath Rathod, Civil Surgeon, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Beed, Pursish Exhibit 8, R.G. Hange, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Beed, Amnay, B.J. Sonwane, Beed, Beed, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Pursish Exhibit, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Amnay, Judicial Magistrate, Bashir, Beed, Judicial Magistrate, Beed, Beed, Beed, Beed, Copy

DATE: 1973, 21-12-2011, 7-3-2012, the same day, 17-7-2012, 17-7-2012, 1982, 17-7-2012, 1973, 2001

GPE: Application, District Hospital, Cri

ORG: Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application No, the Court of Sessions, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application, Learned Sessions, Criminal Revision, Sessions Court, Court, Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Learned Counsel, the Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Rajasthan High Court, L.J. 701, the Court of Session, the Criminal Revision Application, the Sessions Court, Criminal Revision Application, Sessions Court, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application No, Application, the Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, Sessions Court, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, the Criminal Revision Application, the Sessions Court, the Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, the Criminal Revision Application, Sessions Court, the High Court, Sessions Court, Criminal Court, Court, such Criminal Revision Application, Criminal Revision Application, the Sessions Court, the High Court, the Court of Sessions, the High Court, RajindarPrasad Vs, SC, AIR, the High Court, the Criminal Revision Application, the Court of Sessions, the Criminal Revision Application, the Criminal Revision Application No, Criminal Application, Criminal Revision Application No, the Criminal Revision Application No, Court

WORK_OF_ART: Prohibition of Sex Selection Act, Seen

NORP: Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish, Pursish

PRODUCT: ShriSwetamber Jain Sampraday Vs, Exhibit 1, ShriSwetamber Jain Sampraday Vs