Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Susme Builders Private Limited Vs. Chief Executive Officer Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Others

Decided On : Aug-14-2012

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Slum Act, the Slum Act, the General Body of the Society, Chapter I A of the Slum Act, Chapter 1A, the Slum Act, the Slum Act, Chapter 1-A, Chapter 1-A, Chapter 1A, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Slum Act, Article 226 of the Constitution and, Section 13(2, the Slum Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 3(K, the Slum Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 3(k, the Slum Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Respondent No.2, Section 129(6, the Customs Act

PERSON: N.M. Jamdar J. Rule, Shri, S. S. Zhende, Shivaji Nagar, Pradeep Sancheti, Pravin Samdani, Ravi Kadam, Shri V.R.Dhond, Sancheti, Shri Zende, Kadam, Tulsiwadi, Kadam, Samdani, Samdani, Zhende, Tulsiwadi Navnirman, L.J. 107, Grover, Tulsiwadi, Tulsiwadi, Grover, C. N. Rudramurthy's, Tulsiwadi, Tulsiwadi, Kadam, Kadam, Tulsiwadi Navnirman, Tulsiwadi, Administrative Law, Prem Chand, Girja Shankar Pant, S. Parthasarathi v. State of, Bench, V.K. Khanna, Woolf, Jowell, Kadam, Tulsiwadi Navnirman, Shri Zende

CARDINAL: 2., two, 3, only one, 4., 852, 190, 15, 2, two, 5., 6, only two, 15, one, 79, 8., 9, 10, only two, fifteen, only two, 11, 24, 12, 13, five, two, three, 14, 15, five, two, three, 1, 16, No.2, 2008(1, 17, 5, only two, 5, 18, 19, 20, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 21, 123, 22, 23, 1, 1, 118, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 1-11-2007, 15-11-2007, 28, 29, 30, 31, two, 32, 4, 52, 53, 10, 1, 182, 3, 2, 330, 57, 33, 34, 35., one, two, five, 37., 38, 39, two, 40

ORG: Society, Society, the Slum Redevelopment Authority, Society, the High Power Committee, Committee, Society, SRA, High Powered Committee, Society, C.T.S No.7627, Ovale Kalyan, Society, Society, Society, The Additional Collector, TMC / REM, Competent Authority, the Additional Collector, Slum Rehabilitation Development Committee, Letter of Intent, IOD, SRD Committee, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance, SRD, SR (Slum Rehabilitation, LOI, Shivaji Nagar Residents Association, Court, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, CRZ, Authority, Society, Writ Petition No.2269 of 2001, the Urban Development Department, Society, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Society, SRA, SRA, Society, Society, Society, the Anti Corruption Bureau, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, SRA, Society, Arbitration Petition No.885, Court, Society, Civil, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Court, Society, Society, SRA, Society, Court, M/s J.G.Developers Pvt. Ltd., the Society in Arbitration, M/s J.G.Developers Pvt. Ltd., Society, the High Powered Committee, State, the High Court, Society, Society, the High Power Committee, Society, Society, Society, Society, the High Power Committee, The High Power Committee, Society, the High Power Committee, The High Power Committee, Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, Committee, High Power Committee, Committee, Society, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, M/s. J.G.Developer, the High Power Committee, Committee, Society, Society, Court, Court, the High Power Committee, Society, Society, Society, Slum Rehabilitation Area, SRA, SRA, SRA, SRA, High Power Committee, The High Power Committee, Court, TulsiwadiNavnirman Co-op, Housing Society Ltd., State of, Committee, Committee, Committee, the High Power Committee, Court, The High Power Committee, Court, the High Power Committee, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Society, the High Power Committee, Court, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, Court, Society, Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, Court, Court, The Writ Courts, State, Maharashtra Slum Area, MHADA, MRTPA, Court, Court, Legislature, the State Government, Monitoring Agency, State, The State Government, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, State, the Learned Advocate General, Court, the Competent Authority, SRA, SRA, MHADA, SRA, Government, Coordination, the Agencies and Authorities, MHADA, MMRDA, Committee, Committee, Court, Court, Court, MHADA, MMRDA, Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Court, Committee, Court, The State Government, Committee, the High Power Committee, Advocate General, Court, IndiraSRA Co-operative, Housing Society V/s, the High Power Committee, the High Court, the High Power Committee, SRA, Slum Rehabilitation Authority/Public Body/State, Housing Society of Slum Dwellers and, Housing Society of Slum Dwellers, Society, the High Powered Committee, the High Power Committee, The Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the High Power Committee, Advocate General, the State Government, the High Court, The Apex Court, Settlements, The Apex Court, Court, Pathshala, The High Court, the State Government, the High Power Committee, the High Court, the State Government, the High Power Committee, The Apex Court's, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Court, Committee, SRA, the High Power Committee, Committee, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, SRA, Committee, SRA, the High Power Committee, Committee, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, the High Power Committee, the High Court, SRA, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, Committee, the High Power Committee, Committee, Committee, HPC, SRA, Writ Petition No.2437, SRA, HPC, this Hon'ble Court, Hon'ble Court, Appeal, the High Power Committee, The High Power Committee, Committee, Committee, Committee, Applicant, Applicant, Application, Committee, Committee, SRA, Committee, the Government of Maharashtra issued, Committee, SRA, SRA, SRA, Committee, Reliance, Committee, Court, AdvaniBuilders, the High Power Committee, Committee, the High Power Committee, the Division Bench, HPC, Division, Committee, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, N.K.Bajpaivs Union of India, Tribunals, Tribunal, Court, ManakLal, AIR 1957, RasmiranjanDas, Sarojkanta Behera, KumaonMandal Vikas Nigam Ltd., Court, Court, Court, State of Punjab, arise&#8221, The Apex Court, The Apex Court, Committee, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Edn.pg.530, Committee, the Judgment of Full, Committee, Committee, Committee, the High Power Committee, the Committee for the, Reliance, Advani Builders, Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, The High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee, the High Power Committee

DATE: the year 1986, June 2011, 26 years, 18 June 2012, two decades, the year 1985, 27 December 1986, 21 June 1993, 3 May 1995, 5 April 1995, 15 January 1996, 20 April 1996, 1971, 27 January 1998, 1996, 3 November 1998, 1999, 13 December 1999, 7 August 2002, 2009, 5 April 2009, 22 February 2009, 7 July 2009, 8 September 2009, 25 May 2011, 25 May 2011, 4 June 2011, 2 June 2011, 11 August 2011, 2009, 1 November 2009, today, 26 years, last 26 years, 1999, at least 13 years, the year 1998, 14-9-2009, 2012, the intervening years, 18 June 2012, 17 March 2012, May 2012, 2011, 30th March 2012, last 26 years, the last 26 years, 2007, 27 July 2007, 1971, 15 November 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, Respondent No.2, 17th March, 2012, 2012, Respondent No.2, 16th June, 2012, 17 March 2012, 5 May 2012, 18 June 2012, 17.03.2012, 01-11-2007, 2007, two earlier, 2012, 2000, 54, 2001, 55, 1974, 56, 2001, 26 years, 12017, 36, 18 June 2012, six weeks, today

GPE: Mumbai, Santa Cruz, Mumbai, the City of Mumbai, Mumbai, L.J., F.B., Counsel, Bombay, Mumbai

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, first, first, second, 5th, first, first, first, Firstly, first, 5th

LOC: East

NORP: Rehab, Statute, Eligibility, Harmony

PERCENT: 70 %, 70 %, 70%, 70%, 70%

FAC: Resolution, the District Collectorate, the Gram Panchayat High School, Resolution

WORK_OF_ART: the Chamber Summons, -Judicial Review of Administrative Action

PRODUCT: No.1, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Respondent, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, The Full Bench of Hon'ble High Court, Judgment, Judgment

MONEY: as &#, 8220;CEO&#8221, 8220;15, 8220;(b, 8220;6, 8220;cards, 8220;8

QUANTITY: six degrees

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //