Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co. Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.

Decided On : May-31-1927

Court : US Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context

$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'FTC',
			(int) 1 => 'American Tobacco Co. - 274',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 3 => 'FTC',
			(int) 4 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
			(int) 5 => 'FTC',
			(int) 6 => 'American Tobacco Company
 



 No',
			(int) 7 => 'Syllabus',
			(int) 8 => 'U.S. 638',
			(int) 9 => 'the Federal Trade Commission',
			(int) 10 => 'McREYNOLDS',
			(int) 11 => 'Court',
			(int) 12 => 'the American Tobacco Company',
			(int) 13 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
			(int) 14 => 'Federal Trade Commission',
			(int) 15 => 'Court'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 3 => 'Philadelphia'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1927',
			(int) 1 => '1927',
			(int) 2 => 'April 19, 20, 1927',
			(int) 3 => 'May 31, 1927'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '274',
			(int) 1 => '279',
			(int) 2 => '274',
			(int) 3 => '9',
			(int) 4 => '570',
			(int) 5 => '270',
			(int) 6 => '9',
			(int) 7 => '570'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Certiorari'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '94731',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543',
			'appellant' => 'Ftc',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1927-05-31',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 FTC v. American Tobacco Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 279
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 19, 20, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 31, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 274 U.S. 543
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson">
 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 9 F.2d 570 affirmed.
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="544">
 Page 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ.
 </p>
<p>
 Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view.
 <em>
 American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission,
 </em>
 9 F.2d 570.
 </p>
<p>
 It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below.
 </p>
<p>
 The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Affirmed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '94731'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'FTC',
		(int) 1 => 'American Tobacco Co. - 274',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 3 => 'FTC',
		(int) 4 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
		(int) 5 => 'FTC',
		(int) 6 => 'American Tobacco Company
 



 No',
		(int) 7 => 'Syllabus',
		(int) 8 => 'U.S. 638',
		(int) 9 => 'the Federal Trade Commission',
		(int) 10 => 'McREYNOLDS',
		(int) 11 => 'Court',
		(int) 12 => 'the American Tobacco Company',
		(int) 13 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
		(int) 14 => 'Federal Trade Commission',
		(int) 15 => 'Court'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 3 => 'Philadelphia'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1927',
		(int) 1 => '1927',
		(int) 2 => 'April 19, 20, 1927',
		(int) 3 => 'May 31, 1927'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '274',
		(int) 1 => '279',
		(int) 2 => '274',
		(int) 3 => '9',
		(int) 4 => '570',
		(int) 5 => '270',
		(int) 6 => '9',
		(int) 7 => '570'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Certiorari'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '94731',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543',
		'appellant' => 'Ftc',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1927-05-31',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 FTC v. American Tobacco Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 279
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 19, 20, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 31, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 274 U.S. 543
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson">
 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 9 F.2d 570 affirmed.
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="544">
 Page 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ.
 </p>
<p>
 Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view.
 <em>
 American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission,
 </em>
 9 F.2d 570.
 </p>
<p>
 It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below.
 </p>
<p>
 The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Affirmed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '94731'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co. Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'FTC',
			(int) 1 => 'American Tobacco Co. - 274',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
			(int) 3 => 'FTC',
			(int) 4 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
			(int) 5 => 'FTC',
			(int) 6 => 'American Tobacco Company
 



 No',
			(int) 7 => 'Syllabus',
			(int) 8 => 'U.S. 638',
			(int) 9 => 'the Federal Trade Commission',
			(int) 10 => 'McREYNOLDS',
			(int) 11 => 'Court',
			(int) 12 => 'the American Tobacco Company',
			(int) 13 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
			(int) 14 => 'Federal Trade Commission',
			(int) 15 => 'Court'
		),
		'GPE' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
			(int) 3 => 'Philadelphia'
		),
		'DATE' => array(
			(int) 0 => '1927',
			(int) 1 => '1927',
			(int) 2 => 'April 19, 20, 1927',
			(int) 3 => 'May 31, 1927'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => '274',
			(int) 1 => '279',
			(int) 2 => '274',
			(int) 3 => '9',
			(int) 4 => '570',
			(int) 5 => '270',
			(int) 6 => '9',
			(int) 7 => '570'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Certiorari'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '94731',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543',
			'appellant' => 'Ftc',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1927-05-31',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 FTC v. American Tobacco Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 279
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 19, 20, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 31, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 274 U.S. 543
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson">
 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 9 F.2d 570 affirmed.
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="544">
 Page 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ.
 </p>
<p>
 Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view.
 <em>
 American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission,
 </em>
 9 F.2d 570.
 </p>
<p>
 It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below.
 </p>
<p>
 The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Affirmed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '94731'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co. Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'FTC',
		(int) 1 => 'American Tobacco Co. - 274',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S. Supreme Court',
		(int) 3 => 'FTC',
		(int) 4 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
		(int) 5 => 'FTC',
		(int) 6 => 'American Tobacco Company
 



 No',
		(int) 7 => 'Syllabus',
		(int) 8 => 'U.S. 638',
		(int) 9 => 'the Federal Trade Commission',
		(int) 10 => 'McREYNOLDS',
		(int) 11 => 'Court',
		(int) 12 => 'the American Tobacco Company',
		(int) 13 => 'American Tobacco Co.',
		(int) 14 => 'Federal Trade Commission',
		(int) 15 => 'Court'
	),
	'GPE' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 1 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 2 => 'U.S.',
		(int) 3 => 'Philadelphia'
	),
	'DATE' => array(
		(int) 0 => '1927',
		(int) 1 => '1927',
		(int) 2 => 'April 19, 20, 1927',
		(int) 3 => 'May 31, 1927'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => '274',
		(int) 1 => '279',
		(int) 2 => '274',
		(int) 3 => '9',
		(int) 4 => '570',
		(int) 5 => '270',
		(int) 6 => '9',
		(int) 7 => '570'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Certiorari'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '94731',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543',
		'appellant' => 'Ftc',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1927-05-31',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 FTC v. American Tobacco Company
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 No. 279
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued April 19, 20, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 31, 1927
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 274 U.S. 543
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P.
 <span>
<a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson">
 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</span>
 .
 </p>
<p>
 9 F.2d 570 affirmed.
 </p>
<p>
 Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission.
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="544">
 Page 274 U. S. 544
 </a>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ.
 </p>
<p>
 Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view.
 <em>
 American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission,
 </em>
 9 F.2d 570.
 </p>
<p>
 It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below.
 </p>
<p>
 The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Affirmed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '94731'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

ORG: FTC, American Tobacco Co. - 274, U.S. Supreme Court, FTC, American Tobacco Co., FTC, American Tobacco Company No, Syllabus, U.S. 638, the Federal Trade Commission, McREYNOLDS, Court, the American Tobacco Company, American Tobacco Co., Federal Trade Commission, Court

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Philadelphia

DATE: 1927, 1927, April 19, 20, 1927, May 31, 1927

CARDINAL: 274, 279, 274, 9, 570, 270, 9, 570

PERSON: Certiorari