Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Trustees of the Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim Baronetcy Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Decided On : Feb-26-1934
Court : Privy Council
LAW: the General Clauses Act, Chapter 3 of the Act, Section 8, Section 9, S. 16, Section 55, Section 56, Chapter
PERSON: Sidney Rowlatt, Currimbhoy Ebrahim, S. 2, S. 8, S. 2, Provisos, i. e., Lordships, Williams, Singer, Cave, Cave, Atkinson, Shaw, Philimore, Williams, Singer, Williams, Singer, Baronet, Lordships, Majesty
ORG: the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, S. 5, the Sinking Fund, the Repair Fund, the Sinking Fund and Repair Fund, the Government of India, S. 16, S. 14, the House of Lords, House, S. 38, the United Kingdom Income-tax Acts, the House of Lords, Lordships, the Sinking Fund, the Repair Fund, Baronet, Lordships, the Sinking Fund and Repair Fund, Baronet, Baronet, Lordships
GPE: Bombay, the United Kingdom, New York
DATE: 18th August 1931, annually, the financial year, 1928-9, 1922, 1897, any year, that year, the previous year, S. 6, annual, 55, 56, any year, that year, the previous year, that year, any year, the same year, the year, Wrenbury
CARDINAL: two, 29, 39, 1, 3 and 4, 6-17, 8, 9, two, 2, 2, 1, two, three, 1,02,390, 20,223, 69,182, 1,91,795, 69,182, 1,91,795, 1)was, 2, 1, 1, two
ORDINAL: third, first, first
MONEY: roughly 75 per cent, about 10 per cent, 15 per cent
WORK_OF_ART: Charge of Income-tax, Taxable Income
NORP: Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu
TIME: 9 of the Act