Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Trustees of the Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim Baronetcy Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay

Decided On : Feb-26-1934

Court : Privy Council

LAW: the General Clauses Act, Chapter 3 of the Act, Section 8, Section 9, S. 16, Section 55, Section 56, Chapter

PERSON: Sidney Rowlatt, Currimbhoy Ebrahim, S. 2, S. 8, S. 2, Provisos, i. e., Lordships, Williams, Singer, Cave, Cave, Atkinson, Shaw, Philimore, Williams, Singer, Williams, Singer, Baronet, Lordships, Majesty

ORG: the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, S. 5, the Sinking Fund, the Repair Fund, the Sinking Fund and Repair Fund, the Government of India, S. 16, S. 14, the House of Lords, House, S. 38, the United Kingdom Income-tax Acts, the House of Lords, Lordships, the Sinking Fund, the Repair Fund, Baronet, Lordships, the Sinking Fund and Repair Fund, Baronet, Baronet, Lordships

GPE: Bombay, the United Kingdom, New York

DATE: 18th August 1931, annually, the financial year, 1928-9, 1922, 1897, any year, that year, the previous year, S. 6, annual, 55, 56, any year, that year, the previous year, that year, any year, the same year, the year, Wrenbury

CARDINAL: two, 29, 39, 1, 3 and 4, 6-17, 8, 9, two, 2, 2, 1, two, three, 1,02,390, 20,223, 69,182, 1,91,795, 69,182, 1,91,795, 1)was, 2, 1, 1, two

ORDINAL: third, first, first

MONEY: roughly 75 per cent, about 10 per cent, 15 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Charge of Income-tax, Taxable Income

NORP: Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

TIME: 9 of the Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //