Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jackson and Another (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) Vs. Royal Bank of Scotland (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants)

Decided On : Jan-27-2005

Court : House of Lords

LAW: Article 54, Article 48 of UCP 500

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 4., 5, 6, 33, 8., One, 9, 10, Four, 15, 28, 23, 25, 11, 12, 13, 14, Three, 15, one, 16, 33, 34, 17, one, 18, 19, 400, two, 752, 35.27, 6, 20, 27, 21, three, 1, 2, 3, 22, 23, 25, 9, 354, two, one, 26, 2, 539, 27, 28, 25, 26, 10, 000, 29, 2, 528, 29, 119, 1, 30, 32, 31, 33, 34, 32, 33, 34, one, 35, two, one, 37, 38, 39, 40, 20, two, 41, two, 43, 9, 354, two, 356, 47, 1, 383, 385A, two, two, 385F, 48, two, 4, 2, 539, 1, 399, 423, 388-90, 4, two, 26, 541, 813, 50, 51, Two, two, 52

ORG: Craighead, Craighead, Barrie Stewart Davies, Samson Lancastrian, Samson, Mr Holt, Samson, the Royal Bank of Scotland Plc, Bank, Bank, Samson, Samson, Samson, Bank, Samson, Samson, Samson, Samson, Samson, Pet Products Ltd., Samson, Bank, Pet Products, Samson, Bank, Samson, Pet Products, Samson, Pet Products', Pet Products', Samson, Pet Products, Samson, Samson, Bank, International Division, Samson, Samson, Bank, Bank, Samson, Bank, Pet Products, Bank, Bank, Samson, Bank, Samson, Samson, Bank, Pet Products, Bank, Bank, Pet Products', Samson, Bank, Samson, Pet Products, Samson, Samson, Pet Products, Pet Products, Samson, Samson, Bank, Samson, Pet Products, Pet Products, Samson, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Bank, Samson, Samson, Samson, Samson, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Samson, Samson, Samson, Pet Products, The Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, The Court of Appeal, Bank, Samson, Bank, Bank, the Court of Appeal, Samson, Bank, Bank, Samson, Bank, Bank, Samson, Samson, Bank, Samson, Bank, Samson, the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, UCP 400, Bank, Bank, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Pet Products, Bank, Samson, Davies, Pet Products, Pet Products, Samson, Samson, Samson, Samson, Samson, Bank, Pet Products', Samson, Bank, Bank, Pet Products, Samson, Samson, Bank, the Court of Appeal, Newman Industries Ltd, Bank, Samson, Bank, Samson, Samson, Bank, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Potter LJ, Samson, Samson, The Court of Appeal, Potter LJ, Bank, Samson, Allied Maples Group Ltd, Smith LJ, Potter LJ, Bank, Samson, Bank, Bank, Bank, Samson, LJ, Samson, Bank, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Bank, Samson, Bank, the Court of Appeal, Bank, Samson, Samson, Bank, Bank, Samson, Samson, Bank, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, Bank, Potter LJ, Samson, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Pet Products', Bank, Samson, Samson, the Court of Appeal's, Bank, Pet Products', Samson, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Potter LJ, Lordships, Bank, Lordships, Samson, Bank, the Court of Appeal, Pounds Sterling, Craighead, Gloucester, the Court of Appeal, Newman Industries Ltd, House, Upjohn, Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society, H Parsons (Livestock) Ltd, QB 791, Samson, Samson, Bank, Bank, Bank, Samson, Bank, the International Business Division, Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society, Samson, Samson, the Court of Appeal, Craighead

GPE: Gestingthorpe, Thailand, the United Kingdom, Thailand, Manchester, Preston, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Manchester, Veerachai, Hadley, Veerachai, Wigan, Wigan, Preston, Gestingthorpe, Gloucester, Greenwich, Greenwich, Manchester, Gestingthorpe

PERSON: James Jackson, Economy Bag, Taylor, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Jackson, Taylor, Economy Bag, Jackson, Taylor, Economy Bag, Samson, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag's, Samson, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Samson, Samson, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Taylor, Economy Bag's, Economy Bag, Taylor, Economy Bag, Kershaw QC, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Taylor, Economy Bag's, Economy Bag, Potter LJ, Nourse LJ, Ferris, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Hapgood QC, Economy Bag, Goode, Potter LJ, Hapgood, Economy Bag, Veerachai, Taylor, Taylor, Taylor, Hapgood, Economy Bag, Taylor, Asquith LJ, Victoria Laundry, Economy Bag, Taylor, Economy Bag's, Economy Bag, Asquith LJ, Victoria Laundry, Evans LJ, Hadley v Baxendale, Economy Bag, ¦, Economy Bag's, Economy Bag, Economy Bag's, Andrews, Hapgood, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Hapgood, Economy Bag's, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Andrews, Taylor, Andrews, Economy Bag Samson, M6 Cash, Carry, Taylor, Andrews, Wigan, Economy Bag, Taylor, Economy Bag, Carry, Economy Bag, Taylor, Miss Andrews, Hapgood, Keith, Lordships, Keith, Andrews, Hapgood, Hope, Alderson, Hadley v Baxendale, Alderson, Lord Reid, Asquith LJ, Victoria Laundry, Czarnikow, Morris, Hadley v Baxendale, Reid, Asquith LJ's, Evans LJ, Waite LJ, John May, Evans LJ, Hadley v Baxendale, Scarman LJ, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Economy Bag, Pearce, Clerk, Bolton Deane, Economy Bag, Hope, Hope

WORK_OF_ART: Samson, 4 All ER, 4 All ER 119, 1 All ER 525

LOC: the Far East, the Far East, the West Midlands

DATE: 1990, September 1900, March 1993, March 1991, May 1991, October 1991, January 1993, 7 January 1993, 22 January 1993, 1 February 1993, 15 March 1993, the year ending March 1994, Between March 1994 and March 1995, Between March 1995, March 1996, Between March 1996 and March 1997, 1998, four years, each of these years, the reduction year, year, as long as four years, the four year period, one year, one year, only four years, six years, 22 January 1993, 1983, 1 January 1994, 2003, 1995, 1019, the end of 1991, January 1993, 1854, 1949, the four years, March 1993 to March 1997, each year, 1993-1994, 1994-1995, 1995-1996, 1996-1997, 1949, 1996, 31, 1995, 1602, 1614C, 31, 32, the following years, as long as four years, one year, 35, the year 1993/94, para 31, the following years, 36, only about two months, between 22 January 1993, 15 March 1993, one year, only four years', the four years, 42, four year, 44, 45, 1854, 46, two days, 1969, 1949, 1969, 49, 1996, 1994, 1978, 1978, 53

PRODUCT: Manchester

PERCENT: 5%, 10%, 19%, 5%, 5%, 5%

NORP: Thai

ORDINAL: second, first, fourth, first, first, third, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, second, third, second, third, first, second, first, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, second, first, second

MONEY: 50,976, 43,932.50, 257,944, 468,296, 462,467, 645,429, 27, 42,000, 29,000, 26,500, 124,500, 38,831, 47,278.15, 45,000

FAC: Hadley v Baxendale, Hadley v Baxendale 9 Exch 341, Kpohraror v Woolwich Building, Hadley v Baxendale, Hadley v Baxendale 9 Exch 341, Hadley v Baxendale, Hadley v Baxendale, Hadley v Baxendale

QUANTITY: over 100 miles

EVENT: US Dollars

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //