Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Birmingham City Council (Appellants) Vs. Walker (Fc) (Respondent)

Decided On : May-16-2007

Court : House of Lords

LAW: the Housing Act 1985, Chapter II, the Housing Act 1980, Section 89, section 87, section 88(1, the Rent Act, Chapter II, section 12(1)(g, section 13, the Rent Act 1965, the Rent Act 1977, the Rent Act, section 91, section 89, section 86, section 86(1, section 86(1, Chapter I of Part

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2., 14, two, 3., one, 4., 1, 498, 5., 2, 291, one, 6, one, one, 3)(c, 88, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, only one, 10, 11, three, 12, 13

PERSON: Mrs Betty Walker, Paul, Mrs Betty Walker, Hamilton, Rix LJJ, Peter Smith, Whitmore v Lambert, Underwood QC, Mrs Thatcher, Mrs Betty Walker, Hoffmann, Hoffmann, Hoffmann, Hoffmann

GPE: Birmingham

DATE: February 2004, 1965, 1969, 1980, 2006, 2641, 1977, 1980, more than 60 years earlier, their earliest days, 1920, 1955, today, 1942, 1969, 20 year, 1966, 1975, 1980, 1969, 2004, 1966, 2004, 1969, 1969, 1980, 14, 15

EVENT: the 1985 Act, the 1980 Act, the 1980 Act, the 1985 Act, the 1985 Act

ORG: the Court of Appeal, the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest, Labour, Carter v SU Carburetter Co, in1986, Parliament, Parliament

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly

MONEY: 8212

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //