Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Birmingham City Council (Appellants) Vs. Walker (Fc) (Respondent)
Decided On : May-16-2007
Court : House of Lords
LAW: the Housing Act 1985, Chapter II, the Housing Act 1980, Section 89, section 87, section 88(1, the Rent Act, Chapter II, section 12(1)(g, section 13, the Rent Act 1965, the Rent Act 1977, the Rent Act, section 91, section 89, section 86, section 86(1, section 86(1, Chapter I of Part
CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2., 14, two, 3., one, 4., 1, 498, 5., 2, 291, one, 6, one, one, 3)(c, 88, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, only one, 10, 11, three, 12, 13
PERSON: Mrs Betty Walker, Paul, Mrs Betty Walker, Hamilton, Rix LJJ, Peter Smith, Whitmore v Lambert, Underwood QC, Mrs Thatcher, Mrs Betty Walker, Hoffmann, Hoffmann, Hoffmann, Hoffmann
GPE: Birmingham
DATE: February 2004, 1965, 1969, 1980, 2006, 2641, 1977, 1980, more than 60 years earlier, their earliest days, 1920, 1955, today, 1942, 1969, 20 year, 1966, 1975, 1980, 1969, 2004, 1966, 2004, 1969, 1969, 1980, 14, 15
EVENT: the 1985 Act, the 1980 Act, the 1980 Act, the 1985 Act, the 1985 Act
ORG: the Court of Appeal, the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest, Labour, Carter v SU Carburetter Co, in1986, Parliament, Parliament
ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly
MONEY: 8212