Capewell (Respondent) Vs. Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellants) and Another

Decided On : Jan-31-2007

Court : House of Lords

LAW: the Terrorism Act 2000, section 74, the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2002, section 2 of the Civil Procedure Act 1997, Rule 69, section 21, section 26(7, section 48 of POCA 2002, section 81(5, section 88(2, CPR 69, section 89

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 5, thirteen, 6, 77, 3, 7, 6, 8, half, some fifty, 9, 1, 2, 3, 22, 23, 10, 11, 12, 28, 7, 69, 13, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 18, 1, 177, one, 29, 15, 16, 17, 2003, 1, 177, 23, 25, 23, 25, 1, 164, 4(1, 19, 447, 20, 52, three, 21, 1, 161, 1, 225, 229, 1, 358, 363, 22, 1, three, 975, 23, one, three, 177, 45, 24, 2, three, one, two, 6(d, 25, 69.7 26, 50, 27, 28, 4, 1, 2, 3

GPE: Gestingthorpe, Gestingthorpe, Gestingthorpe, Staffordshire, Gestingthorpe

ORG: RODGER, Steyn, Parliament, the Proceeds of Crime Act 1995, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Customs, HM Customs and Excise, the Value Added Tax Act, Customs, Colin Jones, Customs' Asset Forfeiture Unit, Court, Customs, Customs, Lordships, the Court of Appeal, Customs, Customs, court&#8212, court&#8212, Customs, Hughes, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, Hughes, Hughes, Mr Mitchell QC, the Court of Appeal (Laws, Court, the Court of Appeal, Court, the Court of Appeal, The Court of Appeal, Capewell v Customs and Excise Commissioners, Lordships, The Court of Appeal, Hughes v Customs and Excise Commissioners, Court, Court, Customs, Customs, Hughes, Co AG, State for Trade and Industry, AC 295, Court, Hopkins v Worcester, Birmingham Canal Proprietors, the Court of Chancery, Court, Court, Court, Parliament, the Assets Recovery Agency, Vinelott J in, Clayhope Properties Ltd., the Court of Appeal, Nourse LJ, the Court of Appeal, VAT, LJ, LJ, Aiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd, AC 965, the Court of Appeal, Hughes, the Court of Appeal, matter—will, Court, Customs, Hughes, Hughes, Parliament, Hughes, the Crown Court, The Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, Customs, the Court of Appeal's

DATE: 2003, 1146, 1152, 1988, 1994, 1995, 1988, 24 March 2003, 30 January 2003, 9 October 2002, 11 April 2002, 24 September 2002, 1994, some months, 9 October 2002, 76, 1988, 17 January 2003, 30 January 2003, 1988, 1988, this the 23rd day of January 2003, 21 November 2002, recent years, 26 April 2003, 31 March 2004, 2 June 2004, 30 January 2003, an early date, 5 February 2004, 6 April 2004, 2004, 2006, 2058, 2 December 2002, about two months, 13 October 2004, the next day, 2003, 26 October 2004, 2 December 2004, 1 June 2004, 13 October, 2005, 2005, 7 July 2005, 29 July 2005, 1 June 2004, 50, 1975, 1988, 1868, 1988, 1994, 48, 50, 1911, 1987, 1988, 1999, 1236, 1986, 1988, 1994, 2003, the years, 1988, 1988, 46, 47, 1988, 1988, 1988, 2003, 21 November 2002, an earlier date, 29 July 2005, 14 days, 29

WORK_OF_ART: Customs, 1 All ER

PERSON: Robert Capewell, Capewell, £18m. His, Nigel Sinclair, Kroll Buchler Phillips, Colin Jones, John Ashley Associates, Lindsay J mentioned, Jackson, Lindsay J, Lindsay J's, Capewell, Sinclair, Davis, Davis J, Ms Barber, Jackson J. Under, Lindsay J, Carnwath LJJ, Carnwath LJ, Lindsay J, Davis J, Carnwath LJ, Carnwath LJ, Capewell, Simon Brown LJ, F Hoffmann-La Roche, v Wright, RSC Ord 115, Landlord, Tenant Act, Vinelott J's, Andrews, Andrews, Simon Brown LJ, Mitchell, Simon Brown LJ, Sinclair, Simon Brown LJ, Jackson, Davis, LORD MANCE My Lords

FAC: the Receivership ie, Boehm v Goodall

ORDINAL: first, Second, Third, first, second, third, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Rules, SI 2002 No

PRODUCT: LR 6 Eq 437

NORP: CJA—despite