Kirin-amgen Inc and Others (Appellants) Vs. Hoechst Marion Roussel Limited and Others (Respondents) Kirin-amgen Inc and Others (Respondents)

Decided On : Oct-21-2004

Court : House of Lords

LAW: the Patents Act, Article 84, article 69, Protocol 23, the "Protocol on the Interpretation of Article 69, Article 69, Protocol, article 69, article 69, Protocol, Section 60, Protocol, Article, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, article 69, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, article 69, Protocol, article 69, article 2, Protocol, the Munich Act, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, article 69, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, article 69, Protocol, Protocol, article 69, article 69, Protocol, Schneidemesser 1, Protocol, Article 69, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Protocol, Novelty 86, section 60, the Patents Act 1949, article 64(2, article 64(2, article 64(2, article 64(2, article 64(2, article 64(2, section 72(1)(c

CARDINAL: 1, 0148605B2, 2, two, three, 3, 4, 5, 252, 252, 26, 165, 80, two, 6., two, three, one, two, two, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12, 10, 31, 1, 26, 1, 19, 26, 1, 19, 26, 26, 1, 13, three, 1, 14, 19, 15, 26, 1, 2, 7, 16, 2, 7, 1, 1, 17, 19, 26, 26, 18, 183, 19, 20, 25, 631, 650, 56, 39, 21, 22, 33, 911, 915, 24, 25, two, 26, 60, 125, 1, 3, 1, 1, more than one, 56, 57, 28, more than one, 29, 30, 1, 1, 989, 183, 243, 31, 191, 201, 32, one, 1, 896, 33, one, 381, one, 34, 35., One, One, 315, 320, 339, 607, 168, 691, 692, 39, 520, 41, 42, two, One, 183, 242, 43, 45, 309, two, 46, 47, 48, one, 50, 183, 243, 51, 181, 189, three, 1, 2, 3, 52, 142, 1, 1, 215, 55, 1, 57, 1, 1, 26, 19, 26, three, 59, 1, 26, One, 60, 61, 62, 13, ten, 65., 66, 67, 68, two, 69, only one, 71, 911, 73, 904, 261, 74, 12 309, 147, 204, 237, 566, 77, 1, 79, One, 2, 687, 81, 82, 83, 181, 84, 26, 87, 26, 1, 88, 89, 90, 309, 91, 8), 92, 19, 26, 19, 93, 26, 1, 19, 94, 1, 95, 1, 1, 19, 26, 96, 26, 19, 26, 545, 557, 26, 97, 98, 99, 26, 26, 26, 100, 101, 26, 102, 19, 26, 1,48, 103, 104, 19, 26, 19, 105, four, 106, 107, 108, 19, 109, four, 19, 26, one, 110, 111, 48-49, more than one, two, 112, 292/85, 275, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 27, 1, 120, 19, 26, 121, 19, two, 19, 479, 122, 19, 123, 19, 19, 124, 125, 126, one, 127, 128, 12, six

ORG: Kirin-Amgen Inc, Amgen, Amgen, Amgen, Transkaryotic Therapies Inc, TKT, Dynepo, Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd, Hoechst, Amgen, TKT, Hoechst, Hoechst, TKT, TKT, Hoechst, Neuberger J, the Court of Appeal, Lordships, House, Biogen Inc v, N, PNAS USA, Amgen, Amgen, TKT, TKT, Amgen, CHO, CHO, CHO, TKT, TKT, Neuberger J, TKT, VI, CHO, TKT, Table VI, SDS, TKT, The Court of Appeal, Amgen, TKT, TKT, Amgen, the European Patent Convention, EPC, Catnic Components Ltd v Hill, Smith Ltd, EPC, the European Patent Office, EPC, Inhalt der Patentansprüche, Convention, Fletcher-Moulton LJ, British United Shoe Machinery Co Ltd, Sons Ltd, Musical Industries Ltd v Lissen Ltd, the Hague Court of Appeals, EPC, the Interpretation of Article 69, the European Patent Convention, Article, Electric and Musical Industries Ltd v Lissen Ltd, Specification, Reardon Smith Line Ltd., Catnic Components Ltd v Hill, Smith Ltd, AC, Notice, Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd, AC 749 and Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd, Catnic, Rockwater Ltd v, Graver Tank and Manufacturing Co Inc v Linde Air Products Company, Learned Hand J, Royal Typewriter Co v Remington Rand Inc, Warner-Jenkinson Co, Hilton Davis Chemical Co, the United States Supreme Court, the Federal Court of Appeals, Festo Corporation, Shoketsu, this Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court, Shoketsu, US Supreme Court, the House of Lords, Catnic, Catnic, Improver Corp, Remington Consumer Products Ltd, RPC 69, the Court of Appeal, Catnic, Southco Inc, Dzus Fastener Europe Ltd, PLG Research Ltd, Ardon International Ltd, the Caliph Omar, The Mead Corporation, Catnic, Catnic, EPC, Catnic, Improver Corporation, FSR, the Court of Appeal, RPC 133, Table VI, Amgen, TKT, Amgen, Table VI, Table VI, TKT, TKT, TKT, Catnic, Catnic, the House of Lords, The Court of Appeal, The Court of Appeal, Amgen, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, EPC, Convention, Ciba-Geigy/Oté Optics, the European Patent Office, BAYER, EPOR 257, Bundesgerichtshof, maßgebliche Grundlage, Symposium of European Patent Judges, Dr, Senate, Catnic, Senate, the International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, American Home Products Corporation v, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, the Court of Appeal 76, the Court of Appeal, Table VI, the Court of Appeal, Table VI, Genentech Inc's, Purchas LJ, Whitford J, Genentech, RPC 553, the Court of Appeal, Table VI, Amgen, Amgen, Amgen, Amgen, Quintavalle, State for Health, the Court of Appeal, American Home Products Corporation v, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Improver Corporation, FSR, TKT, Amgen, TKT, the Court of Appeal, EPC, The European Patent Office, the Technical Board of Appeal in International Flavors and Fragrances Inc, EPC, EPO, Board, International Flavors, Table VI, The Technical Board, Amgen, SDS, The Technical Board, The Board, Board, Board, the European Patent Office, TKT, Neuberger, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, LJ, Office, LJ, Office, Office, LJ, the Technical Board, EPO, EPC, Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, H.N. Norton, Co Ltd, TKT, the Court of Appeal's, Biogen Inc v, American Home Products Corporation v, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, TKT, TKT, CHO, Amgen, TKT, TKT, the Netherlands Court of Appeal, Kirin Amgen, the Federal Court of Australia, Genetics Institute Inc, Kirin-Amgen Inc, The Court of Appeal, LJ, Lordships, Table VI, Biogen, Genentech, the Technical Board of Appeal, TKT, TKT, the Court of Appeal, TKT, TKT, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, Amgen, CHO, the Court of Appeal, American Home Products Corporation v, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Amgen, Amgen, TKT, Amgen Inc v Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, SDS, SDS, SDS, The Court of Appeal, SDS, The Court of Appeal, TKT, The Court of Appeal, LJ

NORP: Californian, European, English, Chinese, European, European, European, German, European, European, English, English, English, English, American, American, American, European, Americans, American, Christian, European, English, R-223, R-223, German, European, German, German, European, German, German, German, German, English, European, Dutch, Australian, Dutch, Australian

PRODUCT: Epogen, RPC 1, 234 F3rd 558 (2000, RPC 299, RPC 287, Millett LJ, RPC 321, â€Â¦, GRUR 903, RPC 1

DATE: 11 December 2004, the mid-1970s, 1997, 22 December 1978, 21 December 1979, the early 1980s, 1977, 5558-5564, 1977, 3651-3655, 1983, the fall of 1983, 1983, 19, 3, 5, 6, 3, 5, 6, 1977, 1982, 1977, the 18th and 19th centuries, 1908, 1938, 1977, 1977, 2002, 27, 1938, 1971, 1381, 1976, 1982, a few years later, 1985, 1997, 1998, 2004, 41, 36, 1877, 1963, 77, 37, 1950, 38, 28-29, 1997, 40, 28 May 2002, 1982, 44, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1995, 49, 29 November 2000, 1982, 1990, 2001, the past fifteen years, 53, 54, 56, 58, 63, 64, 70, 72, the early years, 2002, 1989, 1995, 39, 1990, 2000, 75, 2002, 2003, 2001, 1989, 1987, 2003, 62, 78, 1983, 1983, 80, a 19th century, 2003, 2001, 1990, 85, 1977, 1984, 1996, 82, many years, 1997, 2001, 27 January 2000, 25 June 1998, 2003, 64, 1997, 1989, 2001, 1991, days, 1984

GPE: Massachusetts, the United Kingdom, United Kingdom, UK, the United Kingdom, UK, Germany, Ausgangspunkt, Netherlands, United Kingdom, the Contracting States, United Kingdom, the Contracting States, United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany, the United Kingdom, England, the United States, the United States, the United Kingdom, Festo, the United States, Amgen, the City of London, United Kingdom, Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, Netherlands, Contracting States, Netherlands, Germany, Batteriekastenschnur, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Bundesgerichtshof, the United Kingdom, Bundesgerichtshof, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, Mannheim

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, third, first, second, third, first, third, third, third, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, first, third, first, 10th, 10th, 10th, First, Secondly, second, second, second, second, third, second, first, second, first, first, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly, First, secondly, thirdly, first, secondly, thirdly

PERSON: Takaji Miyake, Eugene Goldwasser, Miyake et al, Dr Goldwasser, Rodney Hewick, Cal Tech, Sue, Sytkowski, Fu-Kuen Lin, Dr Goldwasser, Dr Lin, Lin, Lin, Dr Lin, Lin, Dr Lin, ¦, Hale, Latham LJJ, v A. Fussell, Russell, Russell, Leistung, Jan Brinkhof, Porter, Wilberforce, Jacob LJ, Jacob LJ, rusticos, Cairns, Clark v Adie, Lord Reid, Jackson, Kogyo Kabushiki Co Ltd, Lourie J, Festo Corporation, Kogyo Kabushiki Co Ltd, ¦, Alexandria, Gibbon, ¦, Watson QC, Watson, Watson, HT-1080, HT-1080, Watson, Brinkhof, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, Batteriekastenschnur, Kunstoffrohrteil, Peter Meier-Beck, ¦, Lin, Neuberger J, rEPO, rEPO, Lordships, Lordships, ¦, ¦, rEPO, rEPO, eEPO

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

FAC: Yngvar Hansen-Tangen

WORK_OF_ART: the Book of God, Aldous J, The Board, The [Technical] Board

LOC: Regina