in Re Mce (Appellant) (Northern Ireland), in Re M (Appellant) (Northern Ireland), in Re C (Ap) and Another (Ap)(Appellants) (Northern Ireland)

Decided On : Mar-11-2009

Court : House of Lords

LAW: the Solicitors Act 1957, article 8 of the Convention (, section 78, Section 19, the Terrorism Act 2000, section 55, Section 10 of PACE defines &, section 10(2, Article 8 of the Convention, Article 8(2, Article 8, Article 8(2, the Security Services Act, Article 6 of the Convention, Article 8, Article 8(2, the Police Act 1997, Section 97, Section 98, Section 58, article 59 of the Police and Criminal Evidence, section 15, the Terrorism Act 2000, the Police Act 1997, the Convention 27, article 6, article 8 of the Convention, article 6, article 8, article 8(2, article 6 of the Convention, Article 6, Discussion 33, section 27, the Human Rights Act, the Police Act, article 8, article 6, section 27, the Human Rights Act, the Terrorism Act 2000 Act, section 46, section 76, section 58(1, the Terrorism Act 2000, Section 32, article 8(1, article 8(2, article 6, article 8, the Terrorism Act 2000, section 58, section 17(2, section 71, the Terrorism Act 2000, section 58, section 32, article 8(2, the Police Act 1997, section 92, the Human Rights Act, article 8, the Terrorism Act 2000, article 8, article 6. 73, article 6 of the Convention, article 6, article 8(2, section 41, the Terrorism Act 2000, section 41, section 58, article 59, the Terrorism Act 2000, section 26(2, section 48(2, section 26(9)(a, section 26(3, Section 28, section 30, section 36, section 71, Section 72, article 12, article 8(2, article 6, article 8 rights, section 28, article 59, the Terrorism Act 2000, consultations?&#8221, section 28, section 28, article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Human Rights Act 1998?&#8221, article 8 rights was &, section 20, the Taxes Management Act 1970, Section 20B(8, section 20, Section 58, the Terrorism Act 2000

DATE: 6 February 2006, the sixteenth century, 1969, 1967, 1898, 1977, 1971, 2003, 1996, 1992, 155/79, 1983, 2005, today, 1984, 2005, 1884, 14, 1987, 1989, 1994, 1985, 1984, 1985, 1989, 1994, 1995, 21 January 1997, 1016, 2003, 1763, para 5, 1989, 1987, 1995, 2003, 1763, 5 September 2008, 1978, 29 June 2006, 1990, 1990, 1998, 32, 1991, 1998, 35, 1997, 36, 2006, 37, 42, 45, 1996, 46, 1984, 47, 49, 52, 30 November 2007, 54, 55, 1995, the same year, up to three weeks, 58, 2007, 1989, 1887 ed, 1927, 1884, 14, 62, 54, 19 July 2000, 1046, 63, almost two years later, 1971, 1975, 65, 67, 1979, 1984, 1985, 1016, 70, 2000, 1998, October 2000, 30 May 2006, the past few days, 31 May 2006, 2008, 76, 2007, 2007, 3033, 19 April 2006, 80, 1989, 1995, 1996, 2002, 1884, 14, 1995, 1238, 1249, 1991, 2003, 58, 1978, 1999, 2002, 1999, 2003, 1989, 30 November 2007, 2000, 1989, 1995, 2000, 94, a year ago, 2002, 1884, 59, 1898, 1998, 2008, 1155, 1975, 1995, 1933

ORG: Manmohan Sandhu, Court, Sandhu, Sandhu, Carswell, the Divisional Court, House, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, LPP, RIPA, RIPA, the European Convention on Human Rights, LPP, Legal Professional Privilege, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, Parry-Jones v Law Society, the Law Society, LPP, LJ, LPP, the Law Reform Committee, Calcraft v Guest, Butler v Board of Trade, LPP, Morgan Grenfell, Co Ltd, Court, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Justice, Community, the European Communities (Case, QB, the Bank of England, LPP, Morgan Grenfell, the Court of Appeal, Parry-Jones, LPP, LPP, LPP, The Law Society, LPP, privilege.&#8221, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, Parliament, LPP, the Criminal Justice Act, LPP, the Serious Fraud Office, the Prevention of Terrorism, LPP, State, LPP, LPP, the Strasbourg Court, Court, the Interception of Communications Act, LPP, the Intelligence Services Act, the Security Services, LPP, Home Office Guidelines, HC Debs, the House of Lords, Court, Parliament, LPP, LPP, LPP, SI 1989/1341, Sandhu, the Crown Court, House, LPP, LPP, LPP, Parliament, The Prisons and Young Offenders Centres Rules, State, Court, Court, Court, Government, correspondence.&#8221, Court, Admissibility Decision, Court, The Strasbourg Court, Court, Court, the Strasbourg Court, Court, Convention, LPP, Carswell, LPP, LPP, LPP, LPP, RIPA, LPP, LPP, RIPA, Parliament, LPP, RIPA, Committee, the Court of Appeal, Grant, the Strasbourg Court, Carswell, Parliament, Carswell, State, the Home Department, Morgan Grenfell, Carswell, RIPA, RIPA, specialibus, LPP, the Strasbourg Court, the Divisional Court, LPP, the Divisional Court &, the Divisional Court, the Divisional Court, House, LPP, Court, LPP, Morgan Grenfell, LPP, LPP, the Strasbourg Court, LPP, LLP, the Divisional Court, State, the Divisional Court, State, Divisional, State, the Divisional Court, The Divisional Court, State, the Divisional Court, the Divisional Court, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Carswell, Carswell, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Parliament, the Criminal Procedure (Scotland, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, the Scottish Parliament: the Regulation of Investigatory Powers, the Divisional Court, Central Criminal Court, AC 346, Scots, the Law of Evidence, State, State, the European Convention on Human Rights, Parliament, House, State, Parliament, the European Convention on Human Rights, State, the Home Department, Ex p Simms, RIPA, specialibus, Act, Parliament, the Privy Council in Woodend (K V Ceylon, Tea Co Ltd v Inland, AC 321, Parliament, Associated Minerals Consolidated Ltd v Wyong Shire Council, AC 538, Board, State, Schedule 15, RIPA, Parliament, Craighead, Carswell, Phillips of Worth Matravers, Malone v Commissioner of Police, the European Convention on Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, Convention, law&#8221, the Interception of Communications Act, the European Convention, law&#8221, Convention, the Codes of Practice, State, The Divisional Court, House, The Divisional Court, Campbell, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, House, The Divisional Court, State for Work and Pensions v Morina, the Appellate Committee, the Appeal Committee, House, Committee, McE, the House of Lords, Antrim Police Station, Antrim Police Station, the Prison Service, The Prison Service, the Prison Service, the Prison Service, RIPA, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, the Police and Criminal Evidence (, Court, AC 487, rests.&#8221, Morgan Grenfell, Co Ltd, Court, Barclays Bank plc v Eustice, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (&, RIPA, the Home Office, the Prison Service, State, the Home Department, Court, surveillance.&#8221, Surveillance, device.&#8221, device.&#8221, the Police Service of, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers, PSNI, Surveillance, State, Surveillance, State, the Surveillance Commissioners, Houses of Parliament, State, PSNI, Annex, the Prison Service, the Police and Criminal Evidence, SI 1989/1341, McE, Surveillance, Parliament, House, The Divisional Court, Campbell LJ, Parliament, RIPA, The Divisional Court, McE, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, the Police and Criminal Evidence (, the Home Office Code of Practice, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, the Home Office Code of Practice, the Divisional Court, State, the Divisional Court, the Prison Service, Annex, the Prison Service, the Divisional Court, Parliament, specialibus, the House of Lords, State, the Home Department, the Prison Service Standing Orders, House, Parliament, Morgan Grenfell, Co Ltd, House, specialibus, Parliament, general.&#8221, the House of Lords, the Privy Council, AC 748, Effort Shipping Co Ltd, Linden Management SA, AC 605, Bennion, Statutory Interpretation, Wilberforce, Associated Minerals Consolidated Ltd v Wyong Shire Council, AC 538, Parliament, RIPA, Sinclair v, Cadbury Brothers Ltd, Parliament, specialibus

PERSON: Antrim, Cmnd, Cr App R 181, Hoffmann, Taylor, Foxley, Scott of Foscote, Hoffmann, Law, Law, Phipson, Railton, Stephen J, Khan, Khan, Schedule, Sandhu, Railton, Klass v Germany, Fordham QC, 8220;which, Malone, Weber, Saravia, Huvig, Hoffmann, Hoffmann, Quinlivan, Hoffmann, Fordham, Schedule 8, Schedule, Macdonald QC, Girvan LJ, Francis, Dickson, para 1678, pp 350-351, Dickson, Stephen J’s, Railton, Bach, Fordham QC, Hoffmann, Macdonald, Covert Surveillance, Lord Donovan, Robert Megarry VC, Metropolis, Malone, Malone, Malone, Khan, Fordham QC, Antrim, Phillips, Kerr LCJ, Girvan LJJ, Maghaberry, Ombudsman, Schedule, Taylor, Taylor, Hoffmann, Railton, Schiemann LJ, Klass, Valenzuela Contreras v Spain, Girvan LJ, Macdonald QC, Fordham QC, necessary&#8212, necessary&#8212, Paragraphs 3.5, Kerr LCJ, Girvan LJ, Covert Surveillance, Simms, Hoffmann, Thorndon, Charles II, Fordham, Hoffmann, Simms, Railton

CARDINAL: four, 2, two, 3, 4, 1, 9, 5, 1, 67, 6, 1, 7, 487, 15, 137, 31, 637, 878.&#8221, 7, Three, 1, 25, 26, 8, 9, 30, 32, 10, 23-22-23, 153, 167, 12, 13, 14, 15, 7, 14, 16, approximately 2,100, 512, 17, 31, 18, 92 and 93, 19, 20, 12, 8, 21, 71, 2, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 2, 214, 55, 67, law&#8221, 29, 68, 30, 95, 31, two, 12, 12, 547, 27, 91, 14, 670, 48, 3, 34, 6, 8, one, 60, 38, two, 39, 2000, 2, 40, 41, 1(i, 43, 44, one, 487, 1.8, 3.5, 48, 3.9, 50, 51, 8, 5, two, 53, 56, 9, 16(8, 17, 11, 57, II, 23, 7, 8, 59, 795, 153, 167, 60, 61, 27(1, 27(1, 19(6, 8), 6, 8), II, 2000, 2, 131, 8, 9, 8, 17, 64, 333, 334, 553, 5(6, 12, 18, 66, 68, 27(1, 7, 14, 69, 31, II, 71, 72, 74, 75, one, 1, 79, two, 81, 8, 71, 507, half, 2003, 1, 606, 7, 82, 512, 153, 1, 83, 84, 14, 670, 34, 507, 37, 383, 146, 85, 2, 214, 28, 483, 35, 383, 27, 91, two, 86, 87, three, 6, one, 88, 4, 6, 89, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, 3, 90, 3, 3, 3, 37, 39, 91., 4, 92., 3.1, 12, 3.3, 3.9, 3.5, 93, four, three, 2, 7, 8, 71, 2, 3.1, 3.10, 1, 2, four, 95, 92, 96, two, 97, 2000, 2, 115, 131, 2003, 1, 98, 44(1, 1300, 10, 627, 554, 99, 7, 8, 71, 18, 100, 101, 102, One

FAC: Antrim Police Station, Khan’s, Third Reading, Erdem v Germany

GPE: Northern Ireland, Gosforth CJ, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, PACE, the United Kingdom, United Kingdom, Malone, United Kingdom, The United Kingdom, Strasbourg, United Kingdom, Strasbourg, United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, the Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Belfast, Strasbourg, Germany, France, France, France, Kopp v Switzerland, Switzerland, Strasbourg, Ex Simms, England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Scotland, United Kingdom, Scotland, Scotland, Scotland, Scotland, the United Kingdom, Scotland, the United Kingdom, Scotland, Scotland, RIPA, the United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, UK, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Strasbourg, S, Switzerland, Brennan, United Kingdom, Ocalan, Turkey, Brennan, Ocalan, Strasbourg, Germany, Kopp v Switzerland, Northern Ireland, Strasbourg, Brennan, UK, Ocalan, Turkey, Klass, Germany, Erdem, the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland

MONEY: 8220;RIPA&#8221, 8220;So, 8220;LLP, 8220;I, 8220;The, 8216;come, 8220;does, 8220;in, 8220;in, 8220;(1, 8220;71, 8220;The, 8220;The, 8216;no, 8216;no, 8220;…Legally, 8220;in, as &#, 8220;take, 8220;RIPA&#8221, 8216;One, 8220;mischief&#8221, 8220;in, 8220;bugging&#8221, 8220;in, 8220;lawful&#8221, 8220;RIPA&#8221, 8220;decision&#8221, 8220;The, 6(1, 8220;covert&#8221, 8220;if, 8220;(1, 8220;28, 8220;is, 8220;1, 8220;1, 8220;1, 8220;3, 8220;in, 8220;It, 8220;represents, 8220;on, 8220;to, 8220;privately&#8221

ORDINAL: first, 16th, third, First, first, second, third, third, first, second, first, second, 4th, 5th, Secondly, Thirdly

NORP: 8220;items, Scottish, Scottish, Rules, Gosforth CJ, ECtHR, English

PRODUCT: law&#8221, effective.&#8221, Art

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English

LOC: Northern Irish

QUANTITY: 394 Lord

EVENT: the 1995 Act, as &#

WORK_OF_ART: McE, consultation?&#8221