Skip to content

Hughes Brothers Timber Co. Vs. Minnesota - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-23-1926

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Page 272 U. S. 474

ORG: Hughes Brothers, Co., U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, Syllabus, U.S. 542, the Supreme Court, the Hughes Bros. Timber Company, Court, the District Court, the supreme court, the Central Paper Company, Southern Pacific Terminal Co., Interstate Commerce Commission, Ohio Railroad Commission, Worthington, R. Co., Sabine Tram Co., R. Co. Commission, Texas & Pacific Ry., Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., B. & O. S.W. R. Co., Settle, Spalding & Bros., Champlain Co., Town of Brattleboro

GPE: Minnesota, U.S., Michigan, the State of Minnesota, Cook County, the State of Michigan, Hovland, the Province of Ontario,, Canada, Muskegon, Texas, Vermont, Hinsdale, New Hampshire, the State of Connecticut

CARDINAL: 272, 170, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, one, 163, 269, 10,000, 542, half, approximately 10,000, 229, Four thousand, two

DATE: 1926, October 6, 7, 1926, November 23, 1926, the year 1922, May 1, 1922, October 12, 1925, October, 1921, three days', the months of January, February, March, five days, April 29, 1922, 18 days, July, the day, the tax day

LOC: Minnesota, Lake Superior, Minn. 4, Swamp River, the Pigeon River, the Swamp River, Pigeon River, Swamp, the West River, the Connecticut River

PERCENT: 272 U. S. 473, 25 percent

PERSON: Certiorari, CHIEF JUSTICE, certiorari, Edwards, Coe

MONEY: 2,919.50, 21,233, 2,456.78, 12, 3, 6

WORK_OF_ART: The Timber Company

QUANTITY: about two miles

ORDINAL: first, second

NORP: Champlain

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //