United States Vs. Village of Hubbard, Ohio

Decided On : Jan-05-1925

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Safety Appliance Act, Section 209, the Interstate Commerce Act

GPE: United States, Hubbard, Ohio, United States, Hubbard, Ohio, United States, Hubbard, Ohio, U.S., the State of Ohio, the United States, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Ohio, Pennsylvania Rates, Wisconsin, Chicago, Hubbard, Ohio, United States, Wellsville, Ohio, United States, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Kansas City Ry, United States, Ohio, New York, United States, Washington, Somerset, Washington Ry, Washington, Virginia, Washington, St. Louis, Michigan, Washington, Washington, New Albany, Illinois, United States, MR

CARDINAL: 266, 266, 25, 26, 266, 1, 2, 278, 769, two, 38, 208, 220, 64, 493, 64, 517, 278, 278, 1, 7, 83, 2, 3, 33, 536, 24, 379, 36, 539, 552, 1, 27, 531, 32, 943, 34, 236, 5, 36, 539, 551, 552, 6, 41, 456, five, only one, 1, 98, 287, 2, 77, 172, 4, 3, 271, 4, 20, 20, 406, 22, 187, 22, 201, 24, 30, 593, 33, 448, 38, 281, 41, 584, 49, 255, 52, 57, 743, 58, 270, 59, 170, 59, 60, 600, 61, 302, 62, 188, 62, 64, 468, 77, 173, 267, 5, 13, 20, 13, 250, 6, 41, 488, 1, 478, 1, 494, 464, 1, 469

ORG: U.S. 474, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 474, Syllabus, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Congress, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Commission, Court, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Federal Court, Commission, Commission, Ohio Rates, Charges, Charges, Commission, Railroad Commission of, Burlington & Quincy R. Co., Congress, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Urban Electric Lines, Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Ry, Interstate Commerce Commission, Regulate Commerce, Commission, the Federal Employers' Liability Act, Spokane & Inland Empire R. Co., Campbell, Denver & Interurban Ry, Commission, Congress, Regulate Commerce, Commission, Commission, Commission, Congress, Commission, Interurban Railway & Terminal Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, Congress, Commercial & Financial Chronicle, Commission, Great Falls & Dominion R. Co., I.C.C. 232, Alexandria &, Citizens, I.C.C., Silvester v. City & Suburban Ry., I.C.C., I.C.C. 255, Damon v. Crosby Transportation Co., Michigan Central R. Co., Louisville Passenger Rates, Local Fares of the Hudson & Manhattan R. Co., I.C.C. 430, Beall v. Wheeling Traction Co., Commuters Club, Baltimore & Annapolis El. R. Co., Intrastate Fares of Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., I.C.C. 200, Louisville & Northern Ry. & L. Co., Intrastate, Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Ry, Co., Illinois Central R. Co., Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Ry, & L. Co., Chicago & Northwestern Ry., American Railway Express Co., the Labor Board, Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co., Interstate Commerce Commission, Court, Congress, the Interstate Commerce Act, Congress

DATE: 1925, 1925, April 22, 1924, June 9, 1924, December 3, 1924, January 5, 1925, Oct. 22, 1913, c. 32, 1897, about 1902, 1915, annual, Feb. 4, 1887, June 18, 1910, c. 309, April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35, 65, March 2, 1893, March 2, 1903, March 4, 1907, c. 2939, 1415, 1908, June 18, 1910, c. 309, 1920, July 25, 1903, July 1, 1914, the year ending December 31, 1923, the year 1917, 40, 22, June 9, 1913, 1913

NORP: d., c. 104, c. 976

LOC: Northern Ohio

PERSON: Fares, Fares, Willson v. Rock Creek Ry, c.196, Louis E. Fischer, Beall, Bitzer, I.C.C., Steubenville, I.C.C., Passenger Fares, I.C.C. 366, I.C.C., I.C.C., Fares, McREYNOLDS

WORK_OF_ART: The Shreveport Case, Economics of Interurban Railways

PERCENT: 234 U. S. 342 , 257 U. S. 563 , only 9.4 percent

QUANTITY: 14,165.28 miles

MONEY: 3

PRODUCT: Section 402