Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

C.C.and C.Ex., Kanpur Vs. M/S Bunny Polyplast (India)

Decided On : Jul-07-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 11AC, Section 14

ORG: Department, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise, the Commissioner (Appeals, SDR, Learned Advocate, the Commissioner (Appeals, Department, the Commissioner (Appeals, Haryana High Court, M/s Sigma Steel Tubes, ELT, Apex Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, Advocate, Hon, K.P. Pouches, UOI, ELT, Haryana High Court, C.C.E., Shipley Hosiery Industries, the Commissioner (Appeals

CARDINAL: 31, 29.1.2008, 2, 3., 01, 2,024, 2,024, 42,299, 846 43,145, 18,100, 10.3.06, 13.3.06, 4, 5, 218, 657, notice.&#8221, 6.2, 6.3, 228, 97, 285, 7

DATE: 10.3.06, 1,03,224, 2,45,499 4,910 2,50,409, 1944, 2007, 2008, 31, 2010, Rs.62,602.25, 30 days, today

PERSON: Value, Shri Rohit

PRODUCT: PU Sole, PU Sole 8500

NORP: Central Excise, Punjab, Punjab

MONEY: 8220;Coming

GPE: Rasthriya, Delhi, Del.

ORDINAL: first

PERCENT: 25%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //