Vikram Ispat Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad

Decided On : Jan-20-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Rule 14, Section 11A, Rule 15, Section 11AC, Rule 14, Section 11AB

CARDINAL: 1, two, 2, 3., 240, 641, 15, 12, 4., 16, 5., One, 4 to 7, five, one, five, four, three, 1, 2, 3, 14, one, 2(l, 5., 6, four, 6, 8

ORG: CENVAT Credit of the Service Tax, the CENVAT Credit Rules, the Commissioner (Appeals, JDR, Manikgarh Cement Works, inter alia, this Tribunal in Manikgarh Cement Work’s, CENVAT Credit, Supreme, Maruti Suzuki Ltd, CCE, ELT, SC, the Bombay High Court, Coca Cola India Pvt Ltd, CCE, GTC Industries Ltd 2008, the CENVAT Credit, SDR, Supreme, Coca Cola India Pvt, Bench, Manikgarh Cement Work’s, Tribunal, GTC Industries, Tribunal, Vikram Ispat Ltd, Tri-Mum, SDR, the CENVAT Credit Rules, Manikgarh Cement Work, CENVAT Credit, Coca Cola, Supreme, Hon'ble Supreme, the Supreme Court, the CENVAT Credit Rules, under:- (k), Lordships, Department, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Supreme, the CENVAT credit Rules, Coca Cola, Coca Cola, Hon'ble Supreme, Tribunal, Tribunal, Supreme, Tribunal, Coca Cola India Pvt, Supreme, GTC Industries

GPE: Revdanda, D.R., Delhi, DR, Ld

PERSON: Revdanda, Larger Bench, Bench, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki, Revdanda, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki, Maruti Suzuki

DATE: August to October 2006, August 2006, September, October 2006, 4,89,439.03, 2004, today, 3.11.2009, 2009, Pune 2009, 2009, 2004

PRODUCT: Bench

ORDINAL: third, fourth, third

MONEY: 8220;4, 8220;It

NORP: Hon'ble, Hon'ble, contra