Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. Mistair Health and Hygiene (P) Ltd.

Decided On : Apr-27-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4A, Rule 34, Section 4, Section 4, Rule 34, Rule 34, Section 4

ORG: P.G. Chacko, Section 4A, Cerelac, Section 4A, Section 4A, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, Section 4A, MRP, Board, Circular, Section 4A, MRP, non-MRP, SDR, Jayanti Food Processing, CCE, SC, MRP, MRP thereon, Section 4A, No.819, Tribunal, CCE, VVF Ltd., VVF Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, VVF Ltd., Jayanti Foods Processing, Pepsi, Cerelac, MRP, Section 4A

CARDINAL: 1, 2., two, 821, 3, 215, 327, 4, 5, 6, 400

QUANTITY: 50 grams, 400 grams

GPE: MRP, MRP, MRP, Nestle, Nestle, Nestle

DATE: 22/10/2002, 28/02/2002, 11/08/97, 2007, 1997

PERSON: Circular No.625/16/2002-CX, Rajasthan, Johnson

WORK_OF_ART: the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //