Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. Mistair Health and Hygiene (P) Ltd.
Decided On : Apr-27-2010
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
LAW: Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4A, Rule 34, Section 4, Section 4, Rule 34, Rule 34, Section 4
ORG: P.G. Chacko, Section 4A, Cerelac, Section 4A, Section 4A, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, Section 4A, MRP, Board, Circular, Section 4A, MRP, non-MRP, SDR, Jayanti Food Processing, CCE, SC, MRP, MRP thereon, Section 4A, No.819, Tribunal, CCE, VVF Ltd., VVF Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, VVF Ltd., Jayanti Foods Processing, Pepsi, Cerelac, MRP, Section 4A
CARDINAL: 1, 2., two, 821, 3, 215, 327, 4, 5, 6, 400
QUANTITY: 50 grams, 400 grams
GPE: MRP, MRP, MRP, Nestle, Nestle, Nestle
DATE: 22/10/2002, 28/02/2002, 11/08/97, 2007, 1997
PERSON: Circular No.625/16/2002-CX, Rajasthan, Johnson
WORK_OF_ART: the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules