Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad Vs. Castrol India Ltd.

Decided On : Aug-24-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, Rule 173Q, Section 11AB, Section 11AC, Section 11AC, Section 11AC, Section 11A, Section 11AC

ORG: P.G. Chacko, Corporate Head, Indirect Taxation, Corporate Head, Indirect Taxation, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, The Cost Construction Method, Corporate Head (Indirect Taxation, the Corporate Head (Indirect Taxation, the Central Excise Rules, MODVAT/CENVAT Credit, The Corporate Head (Indirect Taxation, Corporate Head (Indirect Taxation, Tribunal, Tribunal, SDR, the Tribunal s Larger Bench, Jay Yuhshin Ltd vs Commissioner 2000, ELT, Tri-LB, SDR, SDR, SDR, SDR, SDR, de novo

CARDINAL: 1, 1.67, 17.12.2008, 11.6.04, 2, 3, 1.67, 1, 1, 4, 5, up to 30.6.2000, 6., 119, one, 30.3.01, 28.3.02, 8., 1, 9

DATE: 262/06, 1944, 17.12.2008, Today, 16.8.2010, 16.8.2010, 17.12.2008, one year, eight months, January 1999 to June 2001, 1944, 1944, the year 2001, 10,000/-, the year 1999, the year 2000, 2001, years 1999-2000, 2001

PERSON: Order, Bench

GPE: Patalganga

MONEY: 8216;duty

PERCENT: 115%

PRODUCT: 718