Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jaypee Ayodhya Grinding Operations Vs. C.C.E., Allahabad
Decided On : Jun-29-2010
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Section 37(2
CARDINAL: 2., 7.8.06, 3, 4, 253, 440, 5.2, 223, 517, 242, 548, 240, 641, 6, Rs.88,400/-, 8, 9, Rs.88,400/-
ORG: Learned Advocate, Department, Department, SDR, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Larger Bench, Vandana Global Ltd., ELT, Tribunal, Department, Advocate, Vandana Global Ltd., Tribunal, Bhushan Steel, Strips Ltd., CCE, ELT, Tri-Mum, Tribunal, Vikram Cement, CCE, Cenvat, Hon, Supreme Court, Maruti Suzuki Ltd., CCE, ELT, SC, Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Vandana Global Ltd., Tribunal, Department, SDR, Tribunal, the High Courts
FAC: Rs.88,400/-
MONEY: 8216;D’, 8220;If, 8220;49
DATE: 2010, 2008, 2009, 2009, 2004
WORK_OF_ART: The Larger Bench of the Tribunal, the Larger Bench, the Larger Bench, the Larger Bench of the Tribunal
GPE: Raigad
PERSON: goods.”
PRODUCT: Rs.88,400/-