Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jaypee Ayodhya Grinding Operations Vs. C.C.E., Allahabad

Decided On : Jun-29-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 37(2

CARDINAL: 2., 7.8.06, 3, 4, 253, 440, 5.2, 223, 517, 242, 548, 240, 641, 6, Rs.88,400/-, 8, 9, Rs.88,400/-

ORG: Learned Advocate, Department, Department, SDR, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Larger Bench, Vandana Global Ltd., ELT, Tribunal, Department, Advocate, Vandana Global Ltd., Tribunal, Bhushan Steel, Strips Ltd., CCE, ELT, Tri-Mum, Tribunal, Vikram Cement, CCE, Cenvat, Hon, Supreme Court, Maruti Suzuki Ltd., CCE, ELT, SC, Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Vandana Global Ltd., Tribunal, Department, SDR, Tribunal, the High Courts

FAC: Rs.88,400/-

MONEY: 8216;D&#8217, 8220;If, 8220;49

DATE: 2010, 2008, 2009, 2009, 2004

WORK_OF_ART: The Larger Bench of the Tribunal, the Larger Bench, the Larger Bench, the Larger Bench of the Tribunal

GPE: Raigad

PERSON: goods.&#8221

PRODUCT: Rs.88,400/-

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //