Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Precision Punches and Dies (Unit Iii) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane Ii
Decided On : Feb-27-2012
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
LAW: Chapter 82, Rule 9, Rule 27, Section 2, Rule 9
PRODUCT: P.R. Chandrasekharan 1, Central Excise
ORG: Central Excise (Appeals, M/s Precision Punches and Dies, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tata Iron and Steel Co Ltd vs Union of India and Others, ELT, SC, Tribunal, Daksha Cable Industries Pvt Ltd, CCE, ELT, Tri-Mum, the Honble Supreme Court, Tata Iron and Steel Co Ltd, the Hon’ble Court, Daksha Cable Industries, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal
GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai
PERSON: Zone I. 2, District Thane, Notification, Second Schedule
DATE: 1985, 28.4.2002, 2002, 26.01.2001, 1000/-, 2002, 1988, 2004, 2002, 1985, 2002
NORP: Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise
CARDINAL: three, three, 3, 35, 605, 173, 5, 6., 9, 3, 9, 8., 9, 10
EVENT: Unit II, Unit II, Unit II
LOC: Unit III, Unit III, Unit III, Central Excise, Unit III, Unit III, Unit III, Unit III
FAC: Unit No, Unit III
MONEY: 8216;excisable’
ORDINAL: Secondly