Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Precision Punches and Dies (Unit Iii) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane Ii

Decided On : Feb-27-2012

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Chapter 82, Rule 9, Rule 27, Section 2, Rule 9

PRODUCT: P.R. Chandrasekharan 1, Central Excise

ORG: Central Excise (Appeals, M/s Precision Punches and Dies, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tata Iron and Steel Co Ltd vs Union of India and Others, ELT, SC, Tribunal, Daksha Cable Industries Pvt Ltd, CCE, ELT, Tri-Mum, the Honble Supreme Court, Tata Iron and Steel Co Ltd, the Hon’ble Court, Daksha Cable Industries, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai

PERSON: Zone I. 2, District Thane, Notification, Second Schedule

DATE: 1985, 28.4.2002, 2002, 26.01.2001, 1000/-, 2002, 1988, 2004, 2002, 1985, 2002

NORP: Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise

CARDINAL: three, three, 3, 35, 605, 173, 5, 6., 9, 3, 9, 8., 9, 10

EVENT: Unit II, Unit II, Unit II

LOC: Unit III, Unit III, Unit III, Central Excise, Unit III, Unit III, Unit III, Unit III

FAC: Unit No, Unit III

MONEY: 8216;excisable&#8217

ORDINAL: Secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //