Ray Consolidated Copper Co. Vs. United States

Decided On : May-25-1925

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: The Revenue Act, The Revenue Act, The Revenue Act, Title X

GPE: United States, United States, U.S., U.S., Flint, United States, Tennessee, Tennessee, MR

CARDINAL: 268, 268, 443, 268, 1, 2, 59, 686, 10, 1000a(1, 40, 1000a(1, 40, 1,577,179, nearly one-third, 59, 686, 242, 18, 206, 287, 324, 328, 103, one

DATE: 1925, 1925, January 13, 1925, May 25, 1925, 1918, annually, the preceding year ending June 30, 1918, February 24, 1919, c. 18, 1057, 1126, 1918, February 24, 1919, c. 18, 1057, 1126, annually, the preceding year ending June 30, July 30, 1920, the year ending June 30, 1921, the preceding year, the calendar year 1919, almost daily, the year, the year, 220 U. S. 107, the year, the year 1920

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Consolidated Copper Co., the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Court of Claims, Court, Page 268 U. S. 375 , Consolidated Copper Company, the New York Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange, the Court of Claims, Page 268 U. S. 376 , Congress, Stone-Tracy Co., McClain, Fidelity Title & Trust Co., Congress, Central Union Trust Co., Compare Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Greene, Georgia R. Co. & Banking Co., Des Moines, National Bank, the Stock Exchange, Illinois Central R. Co. v. Greene, Association

PERSON: Ray Consolidated, Edwards, Compare Farrington, Wright, Hecht

MONEY: 1, 1000, 5000, 1, 1,000, 5,000, 15,771,790, 10, 34,803,608.99, about $22

PERCENT: 192 U. S. 397, 95 U. S. 679, 95 U. S. 686 , 216 U. S. 420