Sumo Polyconverters and Another Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai and Another

Decided On : Feb-17-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 4, Rule 9, Rule 9 of the Valuation Rules, the SSI Notification

PERSON: P.G. Chacko, Rs.1.00, Rs.1.00, Rs.8,000/-, Delhi Vs

ORG: Member (Judicial, M/s. Sumo Polyconverters, the Central Excise Valuation Rules 2002, CCE, Maruti Udyog Ltd., SC, Hon, Supreme Court, Court, ELT A-102, SC, JDR, Dujodwala Products Ltd., CCE, ELT, Tri-Mum, M/s. Royal Chemicals, E1952/03

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 4., 141, 3, 179, 5., 6., three, 8, 213, one, 14, only two, two, 9, 10, 1953/03

NORP: Rs.7.5, Rs.7.5, contra

DATE: the period July 1997 to March 2002, Rs.50,000/-, 1944, 2000-01, each financial year, the financial years 1997-98 to 2001-02, the financial year 2001-02, the year 2001-02, the year 2001-02, the previous year, the year 1997-98, 2002, 2005, the year 1997-98, 1997-98, the year 2001-02, 2007, 2001-02, the year 2001-02, the month of March 2001, the next financial year, the financial year 2001-02, 2001-02

PRODUCT: Rs.73,92,000/-, Rs.73,92,000/-, 346

GPE: Raigad