M/S Abc Paper Vs. Cce, Jallandhar

Decided On : Feb-03-2010

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Chapter 48, Chapter sub-heading No, Chapter sub-, Rule 57AD(b, Section 11AC, Rule 6, Rule 6, Rule 57Q. One, the Rule 6

PERSON: R.M.S. Khandeparkar, ELT, Nicholas Piramal, ELT 321, Maize Products, Maize Products, Nicholas Piramel, Chandigarh, Zenith Papers, noticee knowingly, Writing, Nicholas Piramal, Bench, ELT, ELT 321, Nicholas Piramal, Dhanwanti Devi and Others, Mahaboob Ali, Nicholas Piramal, Nicholas Piramal, Nicholas Piramal

CARDINAL: four, 2, 3., 31.05.2004, 1,26,59,970/-, 1, 17.05.2005, 2,07,68,019/-, 1,26,38,651/-, 25, 1,52,59,729/-, 30, 4., 4802.10, 4802.90, two, 5, four, four, 6, only one, 7, 225, 181, 244, 234, 431, 79, two, 146, 200, 106, 8, 567, 31.05.2004, 197, 465, 164, 236, 31.05.2004, 9, four, four, only one, 10, 2, 3, three, 11, 3, one, two, 12, 480.10, 173Q, 13, 6, 2, 6(3, 6(1, 2, 225, 181, 6(1, 6(2, 6(3, 209, 4, 573, 15, 6, 192, 143, two, 29, 16, 4, 17, two, 18, 19, 20, 31.01.2005, 31.01.2005, 24.02.2006, 21, 31.05.2004, 1, 17.05.2005, 25, 30, 22, 24.02.2006, 23

PERCENT: 8%, 8%, 10%, 8%, 8% or, 10%, 8%/10%

DATE: 2005, May 2003 to March 2004, 2007, 24.02.2006, the period February 2001 to March 2005, 2459, 2007, March 2006, 1734 of 2009, November 2006 to August 2007, 1985, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2009, 2007, 2002, Rs.10,503/-, 2006, 2007, May 2003 to March 2004, 24.02.2006, February 2001, April 2003, 2006, 2004, 24.02.2006, May 2004, 1944, 2002, 14, 2007, (1996, 2005, 24.02.2006, February 2001 to April 2003, 24.02.2006, February 2001 to April 2003, the period of one year, 31.05.2004, May 2003 to March 2004, the later period, 24.02.2006, 06.10.2006, 2007

ORG: News Print and, Department, Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Learned Advocate, the Bombay High Court, Concept Pharmaceuticals Limited, the Bombay High Court, CCE, the Gujarat High Court, CCE, ELT, the Gujarat High Court, Tribunal, CCE-II, RLT 662, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Haryana High Court, CCE, ELT, Tribunal, CCE, Philips India Ltd., Tri, Learned Advocate, Learned Advocate, Department, the Apex Court, Nizam Sugar Factory, CCE, A.P., ELT, ECE Industries Limited, CCE, ELT, Department, Shri Ashok Kumar, Department, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Department, Department, the Cenvat Credit Rules, are:- &, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Penal Action under Rule 13, the Cenvat Credit Rules, The Bombay High Court, Tribunal, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Central Government, Cenvat Credit, the High Court decision:- &, Cenvat Credit, Court, CCE, Concept Pharmaceuticals, Division Bench, Tribunal, Modvat, Reliance, Share Medical Care v. UOI, Bombay, Concept Pharmaceuticals Limited, Tribunal, the High Court, Concept Pharmaceutical, Concept Pharmaceutical, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Police C.R.P.F., ELT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Concept Pharmaceuticals, Gujarat High Court, Gujarat High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Adjudicating Authority, the High Court, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Nizam Sugar Factory, Department, Department, Tribunal

GPE: thereon, Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Mumbai, New Delhi, India, S.C., India, S.K., New Delhi, Judges, DR

EVENT: Ahmedabad-II

NORP: Punjab, S.C

PRODUCT: 518 (PandH

MONEY: 8220;21, 8220;24, 8220;24, 8220;The

ORDINAL: firstly, second, first, second, third, second, third, first

WORK_OF_ART: Maize Products, Zenith Papers

QUANTITY: 06.12.2007 penalty