Hathway Bhawani Cabletel and Datacom Ltd. Versus Swastik Cable - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-18-2009

Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

LAW: Section 114, the Evidence Act, Section 101, the Evidence Act, Section 101, the Evidence Act, Section 101, Section 102

ORG: S.B. Sinha, MSO, inter alia, MSO, M/s Shri Sai Network Pvt.Ltd., MSO, Wire and Wireless India Ltd., Volunteered &, Volunteers &, Shri Kuldeep Puri, M/s Shri Sai Network Pvt, Tribunal, stated:- “A Party, the respondent:- “The Respondent, CSR, M/s Wire and, Wireless India Ltd., M/s Shri Sai Network Pvt.Ltd., M/s Wire and, Wireless India Ltd., M/s Shri Sai Network Pvt.Ltd., MSO, M/s Sai Network, M/s Wire and, Wireless India Ltd., MSO, Tribunal, Siddeshwar Society, Singh &, the Supreme Court of India

CARDINAL: one, 2, 100, Rs.12,000/-, 3, 4, about 01.03.2001, 5, more than seven, 6, 100, 7, 8, 9, 120, Rs.36,000/-, 01.11.2004, 500, 120, Rs.12,000/-, 10, one, 11, 30.06.2008, 12, 500, 500, 13, 14, 1586, 15, 16, 20.06.2005, 17, 11.04.2007, 18, 120, 500, 120, 120 to 100, 19., 20, 104, 2004&rdquo, 22, 23, 24, 25, one, 08.02.2005, 18.06.2005, 26, 27, one, 28, 29, two, one, two, 2006(5, 558, 19-20, three, 20, 29, 30

PERSON: Vinod T. Patil, Shri Vinod T.Patil, Shri Kuldeep Puri, Shri Patil, Vinod T.Patil, Vinod T.Patil, Exhibit P-1, Vinod T.Patil, Vinod T.Patil, Vinod, Santosh Patil, Vinod T.Patil, Vinod T.Patil, Santosh Patil, Exhibit P1, Vinod T.Patil, Shri Kuldeep Puri, Jayant Mehta, Shri Puri, Kuldeep Puri, Shri Vinod T. Patil, Sarkar’s Law, Gopinath v. Ajharrul, Vineet Mehta, Jayant Mehta, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner, Mehta, Vineet Mehta, Vineet Mehta, Jayant Mehta, Shri Vinod T.Patil, Patil, Patil, MSOs and/or, Shri Kuldeep Puri, Mehta, Vineet Mehta, Shri Sunil Nandoskar, Shri Sachin Khupse, Shri Sunil Nandoskar, Shri Vinod T. Patil, Shri Sunil Nandoskar, Sachin Khupse, Chunabhati, Kamgar Nagar, Shriram Kapus, Uday Pingle, Sunil Khupse, Anil Rishi Vs, Venkatachala Gounder, Arulmigu Viswesarawami, V.P. Temple, Addagada Raghavamma v. Addagada Chenchamma

DATE: monthly, October, 2007, December, 2004, the months of January 2005, May 2006, Rs.10,000/-, October, 2007, December, 2004, Rs.10,000/- per month, 1999, Rs.10,000/- per month, April, 2003, Rs.10,000/- per month, August, 2004, the period December, 2003 to August, 2004, September, 2004, 01.11.2003, Rs.10,000/-, the month of October, 2004, Rs.12,000/- per month, monthly, the month of December 2004, 31.10.2006, October 2006 to October, 2007, monthly, Rs.65,000/- per month, 2006, 1927, Rs.10,000/- per month, the month of August 2004, 30.09.2004, September, 2004, 23.11.2004, October, 2004, 11.02.2005, November, 2004, December, 2004, December, 2004, 28.07.2006, the month of November 2004, the month of December 2004, 11.01.2005, the month of November, the month of November, 21, 21.01.2008, 16.10.2007, 29.05.2007, a later date, 26.07.2006, the month of October, 2004, the month of November, 2004, 11.01.2005, January 2005, fifteen days, the beginning or later

NORP: Exhibit P-1, addressee

PRODUCT: Rs.37/-, ldquo;It, Exhibit P-4, Respondent

ORDINAL: first

FAC: Rs.21,081/-, Rs.97181/-

LOC: Respondent

GPE: Rs.52081/-, Swastik Park

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Sachin Khupse, Shri Sachin Khupse