Skip to content

intermedia Cable Communications Pvt. Ltd Versus M/S Zee Turner Ltd. and Others - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-16-2009

Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

LAW: the Interconnect Regulations

ORG: MSO, 07.03.2009, inter alia, 07.03.2009, CAS, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, inter alia, Telecom Disputes Settlement, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Hon’ble High Court, Subscriber Management System(SMS, CAS, SLR, The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, RIO, Star, CAS, Tribunal, CAS, Tribunal, CAS, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, the Zee Turner Ltd., ICC, Bouquet, Zee Turner Ltd., Zee Turner Ltd., Zee Sports, Zee Talkies, Zee Turner Ltd., the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Tariff Order for CAS, Star Den Media Services Pvt, Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services), The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection, Time Period for Renewal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, MSO, 07.03.2009, agreed: “(V, CAS, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, MIB, Supreme Court, ZEEL (“Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd.&rdquo, Zee News Ltd., Zee Turner’s Noida, ZEEL, ICC, ZEEL/ZNL, ZNL/ZEEL’s, Ten Sports, Sony, SLR, Tribunal, Tribunal, CAS, this Tribunal in Petition no, Indusind Media and Communications Ltd., Tribunal, provide&rdquo, Regulations, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Star, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Star, Star, the Delhi High Court, Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, Ten Sports, the High Court, Tribunal, West-Indies Bangladesh, SLR, Star Den, Tribunal

LOC: Pune, Pune

CARDINAL: two, 01.01.2005, 4.5, 1, 1, 11.4.2008, 1, 2, 29.07.2009, 3, 20.10.2009, 1, 52, 2, 3.15, 4, 1., 40, 2., 2, 3.15, 5, Rs.2, 2., 1, Rs.2, 1, 3., 40, 30, 40, 30, 52, 3.2, 17.03.2009, 1, 2, 3, 6, 28.03.2008, four, one, 2, 6, 8, about 11.04.2008, 4.1, 9, 2, 3, 10, 03.08.2009, 12.02.2009, 20.10.2009, 11, 52, 8, 8.1, 4.3, 12, three, 30,05,660/-, 13, 3.8.2008, 40, 30,05,660/-, 15, 2, 16, one, 17, 18, one, one, 19, 25.02.2009, Ten, 1,75,81,165.00, 23.03.2009, 2,28,19,287.62, 24.03.2009, 52.38, 20, one, 31.03.2009, 21, 31.03.2009, 31.03.2010, 2.10, Two, Ten, 22, 23, 31.03.2009, 25, 26, 1.75, one, 27, 2, 3, more than one, 1., 2, 3., 2, 3, 2, 3, 3.2, 3.2, 3.2.&rdquo, 28, 29, three, 2, 3, 01.11.2009, 30, one, 31, 32, 33, 31827, 1.1.2005, 31.12.2005, 19.06.2009, Ten, 31827, 45.57, 40, 34, 30, 52, 20.10.2009

DATE: 24.03.2009, 27.10.2009, November, 2009, 24th March, 2009, monthly, monthly, 21st November, 2009, 24th March, 2009, monthly, 24th March, 2009, 20th October, 2009, 20th October, 2009, 20th October, 2009, 4th December, 2009, 3.8.2009, 17.03.2009, 2004, 13 of 2004, April 2008, 2008-09, 4.2, 4.3, 4.5, 15.01.2009, 48492, March 2009, 2004, the year 2006, 2006&rdquo, 10 of 2006, at least two months, the next three months, three weeks, monthly, 14, 48492, monthly, 300566, 31828, monthly, 08.04.2009, October 2007, October 2007, 17.04.2009, 03.08.2009, the period 01.04.2009, 08.04.2009, 31828, 24, monthly, March 2009, 17.03.2009, 2004, 17.01.2006, 3.11.2009, 2006, 1.07.2009, 2005, 48492, monthly, 35, 36, 30 days

PERSON: p.m approx, Disputes Settlement, Navin Chawla, Maninder Singh, Arup Gopikrishna, Arup Gopikrishna, Arup Gopikrishna, Shri Gopikrishna, Maninder Singh, Navin Chawla, Chawla, Maninder Singh, ZNL, ZNL, Zee Turner, Zee Turner, Zee Turner, Chawla, Shri Salve, Shri Kathpalia, Chawla

GPE: Delhi, India, Delhi

ORDINAL: 7th, 4th, 4th, second

NORP: Rs.40, Rs.40

PRODUCT: No.1, Voluntary CAS, Para 5 and 6, Bouquet-II, Notification, Para 2, no.1, No.1, Bench

TIME: the minutes, Rs.30,05,660/- p.m., 24 lakhs p.m., minutes, 23.03.2009 i.e., the minutes, Minutes

PERCENT: 2,80,57,410.24 3,32,95,532.86

MONEY: 11.00 AM

WORK_OF_ART: The Explanatory Memorandum

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //