Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai Vs. M/S Tcp Limited, Chennai and Another

Decided On : Mar-07-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: section 44, the Electricity Act, the Appeal No, the Indian Electricity Act 2003, the Electricity Act, Electricity Act 2003, the Appeal 116 of 2010, Electricity Act 2003, the Electricity Act, Section 86, the Electricity Act, Section 185 of the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Order No.4, section 63, the Indian Contract Act, the Limitation Act

PERSON: M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM, Thiruvallur District, Gummidipoondi, Appellant, Appellant, Manali, Appellant, Appellant, Appa Rao, Shrinivas Kini, Ratilal Bhagwandas, Krishna Bahadur Vs, Jagan Bandhu Chatterjee Vs, Nilima Rani, Mohidner Pal Singh, Appellant, Karan Singh

ORG: Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Appeals, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TNEB, the State Commission, the M/s TCP Limited, M/s TCP Limited, the Electricity (Supply) Act, M/s TCP Limited, Appellant, TNEB, Appellant, the State Government, the State Government, Government, the State Government, Appellant, Appellant, Firm Power, the State Commission, M/s M/s TCP Ltd, Appellant, the State Commission, the TCP Ltd, The State Commission, State Commission, the State Commission, Appellate, Appellant, the State Commission, the Respondent M/s TCP Ltd, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, The State Commission, Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Chennai, The Government of Tamil Nadu, the Chennai Petroleum Corporation, Respondent Chennai Petroleum Corporation, Firm Power, the Chennai Petroleum Corporation, Appellant, the Chennai Petroleum Corporation, Appellant, the Government of Tamil Nadu, Petition PPAP No.4/2009, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Chennai Petroleum Corporation, The State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Appellant, The Learned Counsel, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, the Learned Counsel, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Respondents, Appeals, Respondents, the State Commission, the State Commission, Petition, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Courts, State Commission, AIR 1976, AIR 1985 SC, AIR 2000, the State Commission, the State Commission, Respondents, Respondents, the State Commission, Rs.2.25, The Power Purchase Agreement, Appellant, the Respondent TCP Limited, Appellant, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, Appellant, the Power Purchase Agreement, Respondent M/s TCP Ltd., Commission, the State Commission, the Respondent M/s TCP Ltd., the Respondent M/S TCP Limited, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Respondent M/S TCP Limited, M/S Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd, The Power Purchase Agreement, Rs.2.25, Power Purchase Agreement, Appellant, the Respondent M/S Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd, Appellant, the Government of Tamil Nadu, the State Government, Power Purchase, the State Commission, The State Commission, Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd, Respondents, the State Commission, Respondents, Waiver and Estoppel, Rs.2.25, the Power Purchase Agreement Rates, Appellant, the State Commission, M/S TCP Limited, Appellant, the Sate Commission, M/s TCP Limited (Respondent, the State Commission, Respondent Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, Rs.2.25, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, the State Commission, Commission, Appellant, State Commission, The State Commission, Petition, the State Commission, Appeals, Respondents, the State Commission, Respondents, Respondents, Appellant, the State Commission, ab initio void, TNEB, TNEB, TNEB, TNEB, TNEB, the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, TNEB, Petition, the State Commission, State, Order, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Waiver and Estoppel, Banglore Electricity Supply Company Ltd Vs Davangere Sugar Co. Ltd, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, High Courts, AIR 1974 SC 2089, AIR 1989, SC, Puna Theatre and Others, Sind Bank, SC, Sikkim Subba Association Vs, right.&#8221, the State Commission, the State Commission, State Commission, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Gyarsi Bai V. Dhansukh Lal, AIR 1965, Respondent, the State Commission, under:- &, the Board, Appellant, Appellant, Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, the Financial Years 2005-06, the State Commission, PPAP No.4/2009, the State Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the State Commission, Respondents, the State Commission, Respondents, the Power Purchase Agreement, Appellant, Respondents, Appellant, Respondents, Commission, Respondents, Appeals, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Clauses 3.24, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appeals

CARDINAL: 12, 116, 2, 3, 12, 14.10.2009, 5, 63.5, 6, 29.01.1999, 63.5, 2.25, 7, 63.5, 8, 21.06.2005, 3.01, 9, 3.01, 29.01.1999, 10, 3.01, 29.01.1999, 3.01, 11, 12, 2.32, 3.01, 13, 8.4.2008, 8.4.2008, 1, 3.01, 4.50, 14, 04.09.2008, 44,62,67,540/-, 3.26, 14.10.2009, 9, 48, 116, 6, 3/2008, 25.2.09, 15, 116, 16, 17, 107.4, 22.04.1998, 18, 31.03.1999, up to 31.03.2014, 2.25, 31.3.2004, 19, 31.03.2005, 3.01, 3.16, 3.32, 3.49, 3.01, 20, 21.06.2005, 3.01, 21, 04.04.2008, 3.01, 22, 3.01, 04.04.2008, 23, 27/09, 25.02.2010, 3.15, 3.32, 3.49, 3.01, 24, two, 3.24, 3.26, 25, three, 26, 3.24, 3.26, 27, 11, 456, 590, 28, 29.1.99, 3.32, 29, 21.6.2005, 25.3.2008, 30, 31.3.1999, 31.3.2005, 21.6.2005, 31.3.2008, 4.4.2008, 33, 29.1.1999, 31.3.2005, 12/2010, 25.3.2008, 31.3.2008, 1.4.2008, 21.4.2008, 18/2008, 04.09.2008, 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2008, 3/2008, 20.10, 29.01.1999, 31.3.1999, 3.24, 5.5.2006, 26.6.2005, 31.3.2008, 4.4.2008, 1.4.2008, 4.4.2008, 1.4.2008, 4.4.2008, 4.4.2008, 38, 1.4.08, 39, 40, 4.4.2008, 41, 1.4.2007, two, 2003&#8221, No.3, two, 1.4.2008.&#8221, 43, 3/2008, 1.4.2008, 744, 176/2010, 1, 2, 689, 3, 8), 229, 4, 2, 925, 5, 533, 6, 5, 629, 37, 1, 2, 3, 4, two, one, one, 5, 4.4.08, 4.4.2008, 1.4.2008, 25.2.10, 04/2009, 5, three, 1, 2, 3, 4.4.2008, 3/2008, 3.24, 3.26, 3.24, 3.24, 48, 4.4.2008, 31.8.2008, 5.8.2009, 3/08, 50, 3.26, 3, 4, 3.26, 50

DATE: 2010, 2010, 14.10.2009, 25.2.2010, 2010 4, the 1st Respondent, the 1st Respondent, The 1st, 1948, the 1st Respondent, 15 years i.e., 2014, the year 1998-99, every year, 2007-08, the balance years, 2014, the 1st Respondent, 2005-06, every year, 2003, 10.06.2003, the year 2005, every year, 2007-08, the 1st, every year, 18.05.2007, 2007-08, 18.05.2007, the 1st, that year, the 1st Respondent, 31.03.2008, the 1st Respondent, the 1st Respondent, the 1st, 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2008, 2010, monthly, 14.10.2009, 25.2.2010, the 1st Respondent, the 2nd, The 1st Respondent, a period of, 15 years, the year 1998-99, 9 years, every year, previous year, the year 2007-08, 2006-07, 2007-08, years, the 1st, 07.09.2009, the 1st Respondent, 25.2.2010, 13.10.2009, FY 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2006-07, 2007-08, these years, these years, 25.2.2010, 4/2009, 1.4.2008, a number of years, 2003, 1279, 2023 2004, 1985, the year 1998-99, the next nine years, every year, previous year, The relevant year, 2005, 2008, the year 2005-06, 2006-2007, the year 2007-2008, 1.4.2008, 15 years, 2014, 2004- 2005, the year 2005-2006, 10.6.2003, 18.5.2007, the year 2008-09, 1.4.2008, 14.10.2009, 31, a period of, 15 years, the year 1998-1999, nine years, every year, the year 2007-2008, 1.4.2008, the year 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007 - 2008, 5.5.2006, 2003, 13.10.2009, 25.2.2010, 32, 34, 31.3.1999, the year 1999, the next nine years, every year, previous year, 35, 13.8.2007, the year 2007-2008, 26.10.2007, 29.11.2007, 36, the year 2008-2009, 01.04.2008, 1.4.2008, 1.4.2008, 14.10.2009, PPA 3/2008, 2009, 37, 2010, a period of, 15 years, the year 1998-1999, nine years, every year, previous year, the year 2007-08, 1.4.2008, each year, 1.4.2008, 4.4.2008, 31.3.2009, 14.7.2009, 1.4.2008, the year 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007, 2008, 7.9.2009, 13.10.2009, 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007, 2008, 4.4.2009, all these years, 18.5.2007, the year 2005, 2008, 03 years, 14.10.2009, 18.5.2007, 18.5.2007, four years, 2003, 2003, 2003, 42, 1.4.2008, 15.05.2006, 1999, 15 years, annual, every year, 1998-99, 1.4.2008, 2008-09, 2009-10 Rs.3.85, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 18.5.2010, 2004, 1970, 2006, 2001, 44, 4/4/2008, 3/2009, 45, 2004, 46, the entire three years, 4/2009, 47, monthly, this three year period, 1.4.2008, 14.7.2009, 49, 2005-06, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 25.2.2010, 2009

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Notifications, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, 8.4.2008, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, 31.3.2005, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Commission’s, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, 31.3.2005, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant

FAC: R-2, Tamil Nadu, 01.04.2008, TNEB

GPE: Gummidipoondi, Megawatt, Megawatt, Megawatt, Invoice, Sikkim

ORDINAL: first, first, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, first, second, first, first, first

PERCENT: 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, at least 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, at least 5 %, 5%, 5%

EVENT: 01.04.2008, 01.04.2008, 01.04.2008, SC 177

LOC: Manali, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: The Claim Petitions, Appellant, 25.2.2009, 25.2.2009

TIME: minutes, the minutes, the minutes, the minutes, the minutes, the minutes

MONEY: 8220;6, 8220;6, 8220;5.6, 8220;36, 8220;Any