In the Matter Of: Purti Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Nagpur Vs. the Tata Power Company Ltd and Others

Decided On : Mar-24-2009

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Appeal No., the Appellant M/s Yash Agro, Section 142, Section 149, the Electricity Act 2003, the Electricity Act 2003, section 149 of the Act, the Electricity Act, section 10(2, section 185, section 10(2, Section 10, the Electricity Act, Section 86(i)(e, Section 61(h, the Electricity Act

PERSON: A.A. Khan, Appellants, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Order, Order, Grahak Panchayat, Generator, Yash Agro, Order, ABT meter, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Order, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Appellants, Nos, Anr, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Order, Order, Order, Yash Agro, Yash Agro, Order, Appellant, Yash Agro

CARDINAL: two, 02, 5, 2, 5, 3, 02, 3.1, 22.5, 16.8.2002, 15.07.2002, 3.2, 7.4, 7.4, 3, 3.3, 4, 95, 4.1, 25.10.2004, 7.4, 21.05.2008, 7.4, 4.2, 95, 2008.FACTUAL, 5.0, 95, 27.3, 27.3.6, 27.4.3, 27.5, 6.0, 16.08.2002, 15.07, 2.24, 2.24, 7.0, 5, MSEB’s, 7.1, 3.05, 7.4, 8.4, 8.0, 95, 02, 9.1, 05.04.2007, 9.2, 21.07.2007, 9.3, 3.05, 2&#8221, 7.4, 8.4, 10, 95, 10.1, 25.10.2004, 30.01.2008, 8.4, 21.05.2008, 7.4, 28, 7.4, 11.0, 11.1, 11.1.1, 15.07, 11.1.2, 3, 30.01, 21.02.2007, 3, 4, 548,130, 540,000, 5, 5, 3.05, 3.05, 5, 4, 5, 11.1.8, 17.09.2007, two, 12.0, 12.1, 5, 7.4, 22.05.2008, 21.05.2008, 7.4, 95, 13.0, 7.4, 3.05, 5, 2, 7.4, two, 27.4.3, 2.24, 16.08.2008, 5, 14.1, 18.03.2007, 3.05, 14.1.3, 3, 14.1.4, 2, 185, 2, 14.1.7, 2003.DISCUSSION, 15.0, 15.1, 23, 15.2, 09.11.2005, 15.3, 15.4, 15.5, 15.6, 15.07.2002, 15.07.2002, 16.0, 17.0, 7.4, 18.0, 7.4, 19.0, 27.4.3, 2.24, 16.08.2008, 20.0, 15.07.2002, 16, 21.0, one, 22.0, One, 23.0, 18.03.2007, 24.0, 2.24, 16.08.2002, 25.0, 7.4, 7.4, 26.0, one, 27.0, 27.4.3, 28.0, 29.0, one, 30.0, 31.0, 95, 32.0, 17.12.2007, four, 4, 5, 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, 220, 33, 33.0, 34.0, 95, 02, 35.0

DATE: 2008, 17.12.2007, 2008, 02.09.2002, 15.07.2002, 25.5.2006, 18.03.2007 to 05.04.2007, 31.01.2007, 17.12.2007, 2008, 19.05.2008, 2008, 2008, 15.07.2002, 15th July 2002, a period of, 15 days, a span of thirteen years, before the end of tenth five year, 2002-2007, 2002, 16.08.2002, previous financial year, the first year, 2008, 2008, 02.09.2002, 25.10.2004 9.0, 2008, 02.09.2002, 16.03.2007, 18.03.2007, 18.03.2007, previous financial year, 25.05.2006, 31.01.2007, 01.04.2007, 16.09.2007, 27.09.2007, 31.10.2007, 06.11.2007, 13.11.2007, 2008, a period 13 years, 19.05.2008, 16.08.2002, 19.05.2008, 2009, 15.07.2002, 16.08.2002, October 25, 2004, August 16, 2008, 2002, 2007, one year, 01.04.2007, 31.03.2007, 16.03.2007, 18.03.2007, 18/03/2007, the period of 18 days, 18.03.2007 to 05.04.2007, the preceding year, some days, 2008, 25.10.2004, 02.09.2002, 15.07.2002, 18.03.2007 to 05.04.2007, the previous financial year, 02.09.2002, 2003, 02.09.2002, 30.01.2007, 86, 49, 50, 52, 58, 67, 80 of 2008, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 2003, 2003, 15.07.2002, 19.10.2002, 15.07.2002, 21.05.2003, 18.03.2007 to 05.04.2007, July 15, 2002, August 16, 2002, October 25, 2004, August 16, 2002, 2008, 2008, November 21, 2007, 2008, 2008

ORG: M/s Purti Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, M/s Yash Agro Energy Ltd., Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Maharashtra Electricity Board, Energy Purchase Agreement (&, Clause 7.4, EPA, BACKGROUND, The Appellant PSKL, MW capacity Bagasse &#, Maharashtra State Electricity Board, EPA, EPA, Commission, Commission, EPA, EPA, Plant to Respondent NO, Reliance Energy Trading Co. Ltd., EPA, PSKL, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd., Commission, Commission, Maharashtra, Maharashtra Energy Development Agency, MEDA, EPA, MSEB, Clause 7.4, EPA, Commission, EPA, State, Commission, Commission, EPA, Clause 7.4, EPA, Appellants, MERC, the State Government, MERC, the Energy Purchase Agreement, EPA, Commission, EPA, Commission, EPA, Commission, the Model EPA, EPA, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, Commission, Emphasis, Commission, Order, Order, Commission, MSEB, Commission, MSEB, Commission, MSEB, PSKL, EPA, EPA, the Generation Facility, Operating Procedures, Conditions, EPA, MSEB, Force Majeure, MW, the Generation Facility, Generator, Tariff Rate, Default provisions &#, MSEB, an Energy Wheeling Agreement, PSKL, EPA, EPA, EPA, Clause 7.4, EPA, Reliance Energy Trading Company Ltd., Commission, Commission, Commission, High Court, Commission, Commission, PSKL, Commission, Clause 7.4, EPA, PSKL, PSKL, itself&#8221, Commission, EPA, PSKL, EPA, PSKL, PSKL, EPA, Clause 7.4, EPA, EPA, Commission, the State Load Dispatch Centre, Commission, Commission, 06.05.2008, EPA, un, EPA, Commission, EPA, Energy Transmission/Wheeling Agreement, EPA, 06.05.2008, EPA, Appellant, Commission, Appellant, Commission, EPA, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, Commission, Order, PSKL, PSKL, MERC, PSKL, Reliance Energy Trading Company Ltd, Vide, PSKL, MSEB, Connectivity Agreement, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd., Appellant, PSKL, EPA, PSKL, EPA, Appellant, Reliance Trading, Appellant, the State Load Dispatch Centre, Reliance Trading, PSKL, Commission, Commission, Appellant, PSKL, MERC, Order, Yash Agro Energy Ltd., EPA, EPA, Yash Agro, EPA, Commission, Order, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, Commission, Appellants, NOC, EPA, MERC, PSKL, PSKL, EPA, PSKL, EPA, EPA, EPA, UI, PSKL, EPA, EPA, 06.05.2008.14.0 Contention of Respondent No, Appellant, PSKL, PSKL, Reliance Energy Trading Company Ltd, EPA, PSKL, EPA, EPA, The State Transmission Utility, Transmission, ANALYSIS, PSKL, PSKL, Dodson Lindblom Hydero Power Pvt, Judgment, Small Hydro Power Developer Association And Others Vs, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Transmission Corporation of A.P., A.P.StateElectricity Regulatory Commission, Anr, MERC, the Regulatory Commission, the Non Conventional Energy Developers and Electricity Board/ A.P. Transco, Non-Conventional, Renewal, Non Conventional Energy Developers, Non Conventional Energy Developers, A.P. Transco / Discom, Commission, Commission, EPA, Appellants, PSKL, Commission, the State Government, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, EPA, Appellants, EPA, MSEDCL, EPA, PSKL, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, Commission, PSKL, Kay Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd, Commission, MSEB, EPA, EPA, the State Government and Orders of the Commission, EPA, the State Government, PSKL, Commission, PSKL, EPA, PSKL, PSKL, EPA, the Appellant PSKL, EPA, PSKL, COD, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, Commission, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, EPA, Commission, Order, Commission, EPA, EPA, EPA, PSKL, EPA, Appellant, PSKL, Commission, PSKL, the Commission: &, the Open Transmission Access, PSKL, Commission, PSKL, Commission, the Energy Purchase Agreement, PSKL, EPA, Yash Agro Energy Ltd., M/s Purti Shakhar Karkhana Ltd., Commission, Commission

MONEY: as ‘PSKL&#8217, #8216;2.24 Third, 8216;Definition, #8220;beginning itself&#8221, 8216;third, 8216;beginning&#8217, 8216;at, 8216;should, 8230, #8220;beginning itself&#8221, 8230, 8220;(i

EVENT: as &#

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, Third, third, third, third, third, Third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, first, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third

PERCENT: 50%, 90%, 2%, 90%, 50%, 90%

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent No.3, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Commission’s, Appellant, Appellant, Notes of Argument, Appellant

WORK_OF_ART: The Appellant Yash Agro, Appellant, The Appellant Yash Agro, Orders

GPE: Chandrapur, MSEB, MSEB, 08.08.2008, Appellant.&#8221

FAC: Schedule II, the Delivery Point

TIME: nearly 69 hours