Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and Another Vs. Essar Power Limited and Another

Decided On : Feb-22-2010

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Appeal No. 77 of, the Appeal No. 86, the Appeal No., Article 55 of the Limitation Act, Article 55, the Demand Notice, the Limitation Act, Article 55, the Appeal No. 77, Article 3.2, Article 3.3, Article 6.1, Article 3.1, Article 1 of PPA, Article 6.1, article 6.2, Article 6.3, Article 6.4, Article 3.3, Article 3.3, Article 5.2, section 73, the Contract Act, Article 10.1, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Article 3.2 of PPA-1, Article 3.2, Section 35, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 35, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 73, the Contract Act, the Appellant EPL, Article 3.2, Article 6.10.2, section 43A(2, the Supplemental Agreement, the Supplemental Agreement, the Appeal No. 77, the Appeal No. 86

PERSON: M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM, Common Judgment, Shree Ram Mills, Napatha, Notification, PPA-1, Schedule, Foundry V/s Union of India, rent.&#8221, Versus Venkataraman, M. Maniappa Pillai, Versus I. Anthanisami Mudaliar, PPA-1, Deemed, PPA-1, Deemed Non-Generation Charges, PPA-1, Deemed Non-Generation Charges, Notification, PPA-1

DATE: 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, a period of, 20 years, the same year, 30.03.1992, 06.11.1995, 18.02.2009, 3 years, 3 years, 3 years, 3 years, 2009, 3 years, 2009, 2009, November 2004, 2009, 30.05.1996, annual, 30.05.1996, 19.12.2003, December 2003, October, October 2004, 22.10.2003, 1996-97, the 3 months, 13.10.2004, the year 2004, 11.11.2004, September 2004, 30.05.1996, the same very year i.e., 06.09.1995, 10 years i.e., 01.11.2003, 01.12.2003, 3 years, the 3 years, 21, 1963, 3 years, 3 years, 29.10.2003, 01.11.2003, 01.12.2003, July 1996, 29.10.2003, 01.11.2003, 01.12.2003, 3 years, 14.09.2005, 2006, 2007, 27.07.2007, 3 years, 3 years, 1998, September 2004, 2009, 2009 28, 2009, 30.05.1996, 3 years, 30.05.1996, 30.05.1995, 30.05.1996, 30.05.1996, 11.01.1995, 19.01.1995, 30.05.1996, 32, 30.05.1996, 35, 38, 44, 45, 46, monthly, 47, 48, 49, 04.10.2001, 52, 18.12.2003, 18.12.2003, 18.12.2003, 53, 54, 29.10.2003, 31st March 1999, October 2004, 13.10.2006, 55, 1974, 58, 1920, 63, 64, 1977, 1964, 15 days, 1958, 1950, 70, 1962, 72, 74, March 2008, 75, 76, 77, 78, 80, 31.08.1998, 09.02.1998, 30.05.1996, 1948, 2000, 30.03.1992, 18.12.2003, 86, 2009, 2009

CARDINAL: 86, 18.02.2009, 2, 86, 3, 30.05.1996, 29.06.1996, 300, 215, 4, 5, 300, 215, 300, 6, 7, 8, 14.09.2002, 64, 9, two, 515, two, 29.06.1996, 515, 300, 215, 29.06.1996, 300, 215, less than 300, 215, 64, 537, 165 million, 29.07.2004, 64, more than 215, 64, 64, 10, 11, 12, 300, 515, 14.09.2002, 14.09.2002, 215, 13, 14, 14.09.2002, 30.10.2004, 30.11.2004, 215, 64, 15, 14.09.2002, 16, 300, 29.06.96, 215, 17, 300:215, 01.07.1996, 18, 19, 29.10.2003, 14.09.2005, 2, 14.09.2005, 20, 300:215, 22, 537, 01.07.1996, 31.03.1999, 23, 24, 599, one, 25, 26, 14.09.2002, 64, 27, 86, 86, 18.02.2009, 2, 29, 29.06.1996, 515, 300, 215, 300:215, 515, 300, 215, 30, 300, 215, 2, 300, 300, 64, 30.11.2004, 31, 29.06.1996, 300:215, 30.03.2000, 31.08.1994, 300:215, 33, 34, 36, 37, 300, 215, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 1, 3, 945, 2061, 17.02.2000, 50, 51, 58:42, up to 300, 17.02.2000, 537, 215, 64, 64, 56, 57, one, 59, 60, 61, 62, 3, 65, 66, 67, 68, two, 69, 1, 653, two, 71, 2, 73, One, 300, one, 519, 515, 79, 3, 215, 81, 82, 21.03.1998, 83, 84, 85, One, 18.12.2003, 87

ORG: Appeals, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd, Electricity Board, Essar Power Ltd., Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, the Electricity Board of Gujarat (Electricity Board, Electricity Board, the Essar Power Limited, the Essar Power Limited, Essar Group of Companies, the Electricity Board, the Essar Power Limited, the Electricity Board, MW, the Essar Group of Companies, EPL, MW, Essar Group of Companies, Government of India, the Central Government, EPL, MW, the Electricity Board, Essar Steel, The Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Group of Companies, the Electricity Board, the Central Government, the Electricity Board, EPL, The Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Essar Power Limited, Naptha, the State Commission, Application, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, EPL, the Electricity Board, Tribunal, the Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, The Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam, the State Commission, Electricity Board, The State Commission, the Electricity Board, The State Commission, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, The Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Steel, MW, the Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, Essar Steel, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, Plant Load Factor, PLF, EPL, the Electricity Board, MW, MW, EPL, the Electricity Board, MW, Essar Steels Ltd., MW, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Essar Steels Ltd., the 215 MW, the Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Steels Ltd, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Essar Steels Ltd., the Electricity Board, EPL, the Essar Steels Limited, EPL, the Electricity Board, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, Essar Power Limited, the State Commission, EPL, the State Commission, Electricity Board, MW, MW, EPL, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Group Companies, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the State Commission, EPL, Essar Group Companies, MW, EPL, the State Commission, Appellant, EPL, Electricity Board, the Essar Power Limited, EPL, the Electricity Board, MW, EPL, Essar Steel Limited, EPL, Essar Steel Limited, EPL, MW, the Essar Steel Limited, EPL, EPL, Essar Steel Limited, Appellant, EPL, EPL, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the State Commission, EPL, the State Commission, Appellants, EPL, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, EPL, MW, the Appellant (Electricity Board, EPL, EPL, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the Supreme Court, Hari Shanker Singhania, Utility Premises Ltd., the State Commission, the Government of Gujarat, the State Commission, Application, the State Commission, the State Commission, EPL, EPL, Appellant, Appeal, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Limited, Appellant, Electricity Board, Essar Power Limited, Gujarat Electricity Board, Essar Steels Ltd., MW, MW, the Electricity Board, the Essar Steel Limited, Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Appellant, the Electricity Board, The Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, Essar Steel Ltd., Appellant, the Electricity Board, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Government of India, EPL, the Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Essar Steels Ltd., EPL, the Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, The Electricity Board, Despatch Instructions, the Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Despatch Instructions, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Appellant, the Electricity Board, The Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Government of India, the Electricity Board, the Government of India, the Electricity Board, The State Commission, the Electricity Board, the Essar Power Ltd, MW, the Central Electricity Authority, EPL, EPL, CEA, the Government of Gujarat, EPL, CEA, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Essar Steel Ltd., the Electricity Board, Essar Steels Ltd., CEA, EPL, Naptha, the Stat Commission, MW, the Electricity Board, Essar Steels Ltd., the Electricity Board, Essar Steels Ltd., the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Schedule-VI, Electricity, EPL, the Electricity Board, Schedule-VI, Schedule-VI, EPL, the Board Load Despatch Centre, EPL, the Electricity Board, MW, Essar Steels Ltd., MW, MW, EPL, Schedule VI, the Electricity Board, Schedule-VI, Despatch Procedures, EPL, the Board Load Despatch Centre Weekly Schedules, the Electricity Board, the Essar Steel Ltd., EPL, Weekly Schedule, Electricity Board, Board, Despatch Instructions, EPL, Despatch Instructions, Board, EPL, Schedule-VI, EPL, Board, the Essar Steels Ltd., EPL, Weekly Schedules, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Despatch Instructions, the Despatch Instructions, the Electricity Board, Schedule-VI, EPL, the Electricity Board, Essar Steels Ltd., the Electricity Board, The Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Annual Fixed Charges, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, EPL, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Steel Ltd., the Electricity Board, Essar Steel Ltd., EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, Letter of Credit, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Essar Steels Ltd., EPL, MW, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, EPL, Essar Steels Ltd, the Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Steels Ltd, MW, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Essar Steels Ltd., the Electricity Board, EPL, EPL, Essar Steels Ltd., 01.07.96, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, the Supreme Court, the Electricity Board, Party, Neither Party, Party, Party, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Despatch Instructions, The Despatch Instructions, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, The Electricity Board, Supreme Court, Timblo Irmaos Ltd., Judicial, claim&#8221, AIR 1936, Privy Council, Tsn Ah Boon Versus State of Johore &#, The Privy Council, contract.&#8221, State, State, AIR, State, AIR, AP, Dhulipudi Namayya Versus Union of India &, AIR, Madras 289 &#, Madras High Court, Court, plaintiff.&#8221, Murlidhar Chiranjilal Versus Harishchandra Dwarkadas, the Supreme Court, AIR 1974, Raman Iron Foundry Vs., Union of India, un, un, un, Court, Electricity Board, MW, the Electricity Board, EPL, Essar Steels Ltd., Fuel Management Agreement, The Essar Steels Ltd, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Despatch Instructions, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, EPL, Appellant, EPL, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, Letter of Credit, the Electricity Board, EPL, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, the Despatch Instructions, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, Despatch Instructions, EPL, EPL, EPL, the Electricity Board, EPL, the Essar Steels Ltd, EPL, the Electricity Board, Event of Default, the State Commission, Annual Fixed Charges, the Electricity Board, the Electricity Board, Electricity Board, the State Commission, the Electricity Board, the Deemed Generation Incentive as per Notification, Naptha, Naptha, EPL, Naptha, the Learned Senior Counsel, the Deemed Generation Incentive on Naptha, the Electricity (Supply) Act, India-Thermal Power Ltd., EPL, Electricity Board, the State Commission, the State Commission, Gujarat Urgja Vikast Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Ltd.

WORK_OF_ART: the Common Order, 29.06.1996, Notification, Appellant (EPL, Supplemental Agreement, Supplemental Agreement, the Deemed Generation Incentive

GPE: Neptha, Ld, Neptha, Neptha, Naptha, Ld, Ld, Ld, Notification

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, second, first, second, first

PERCENT: 58%, 70%, 58:42 percent, 60%, 40%, approximately 46%, less than 58%, 58%

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Vol-4 SCC 658, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, breach.&#8221, 300MW, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

MONEY: 14.09.2002 i.e. before, 8220;corresponding, 8220;Declaring, 231 &#, 8211, 236 &#, 8220;The, 8211, 8220;The, 231 &#, 8220;It, 379 &#

EVENT: Limitation Act, the Appellant EPL, the Cure Period

FAC: the Delivery Point

LOC: the Appellant EPL

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //